Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Starman417

Ethanol mandates have the economic effect of putting fuel uses of corn in front of all other uses, and of forcing ethanol blenders to pay whatever price for the corn they must buy in order to refine the amount of ethanol necessary to meet fuel needs. This ties the price of corn to the market price of oil.

Since chicken and to some extent beef and hogs are feed so much corn, the price of their meat is strongly related to the price of oil.

Because of the fact that ethanol is at best a marginal improvement on the issue of “sustainability”, and because it is just silly to burn such a high percent of the corn crop, these mandates should be eliminated entirely. If ethanol-blended motor vehicle fuels are such a great idea, people will buy them anyway.


3 posted on 08/28/2012 10:40:43 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: theBuckwheat

Now buckwheat, don’t forget, as the left-wing and arab oil countries forget, the EtOH process also produces a high-protein by-product that is fed to the livestock you mentioned. 60% of the budget is going to handouts for the non-productive, and you leftists feel the need to target the nation’s most productive industry and major export.


5 posted on 08/28/2012 10:54:02 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson