Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney Camp Removing Rules Committee Members
FreedomWorks.org ^ | August 28, 2012 | Michael Duncan

Posted on 08/28/2012 10:24:54 AM PDT by CedarDave

I just got off the phone with a concerned Florida activist, Laura Noble, who informed me that both of Florida's Rules Committee members, Peter Feaman and Kathleen King, have been removed from the Rules committee and replaced with Romney-appointed delegates.

Clearly anticipating a grassroots backlash against the "compromise" on Rule 15 and the changes on Rule 12 has caused the Romney camp to preemptively replace delegates to ensure they have support on the Rules Committee.

It's enough to make your blood boil. Please call your state's Rules Committee delegates here and ask that they oppose the "compromise" on Rule 15, oppose the changes to Rule 12, and support the full Minority Reports on the Rules.

UPDATE: Delegations we should be focusing on include the following states: North Carolina, Oregon, Indiana, Ohio, Nebraska, Kansas, Arkansas, Tennessee, and West Virginia.

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomworks.org ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012rncconvention; boehner; bow2rinoromney; bow2romney; bowalready; republicans; romney; ronpaul; va2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-120 next last
Deceit and desperation by the GOP-e.
1 posted on 08/28/2012 10:24:58 AM PDT by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

The Texas delegates have been fighting mad about these rule changes and fighting hard against them.

I’m trying to get an update from one now about the 2:00 meeting.


2 posted on 08/28/2012 10:27:26 AM PDT by Texas56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

this is sickening.

IF and I do mean IF this country survives to another election after this mess and people like Akin cause the loss of this election.... this republican party needs to go.

The days of the old guys and the elite need to end.


3 posted on 08/28/2012 10:28:03 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Half the people are below average, they voted for oblabla.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Rush is all over this today and he is not happy.


4 posted on 08/28/2012 10:29:04 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Bulleffingshoot!!!!


5 posted on 08/28/2012 10:29:27 AM PDT by Halls (Jesus is my Lord and Savior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Unintended good-thing consequences will come of this.

For decades social conservatives and smaller-govt conservatives have taken solace that they had some influence at the convention in building the platform. Which, as we all know, is pretty much useless as the part all but ignores the platform after the convention.

Maybe now those groups will spend more time focusing on things that matter: getting people who share their principles elected.


6 posted on 08/28/2012 10:30:12 AM PDT by Brookhaven (Freedom--tastes like chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
List of state rules committee members
7 posted on 08/28/2012 10:30:12 AM PDT by CedarDave (Palin/Ryan -- both should have been at the top of the ticket and not play second fiddle to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

So who is it here that keeps saying “we’ll deal with Romney later?” No. You will not.

Behold the dismantling of Conservatism. More simply put ... “told ya”.


8 posted on 08/28/2012 10:30:50 AM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I for one will actively campaign against the Republican candidate more passionately then I do against Obama if the RINO’s succeed at changing the rules as they are attempting.

If they succeed, in 2016 the party will become pro abortion, anti-Christian and yes even anti-2nd amendment.

So the only reason I have to even call myself a Republican will have been destroyed, and thus I will cease to support the GOP.

I used to say that Romney will win in a landslide. I even have a standing $1000.00 bet for anyone willing to take me up on it. However, if he does this, then I believe Obama will win.


9 posted on 08/28/2012 10:31:18 AM PDT by OneVike (I'm just a Christian waiting to go home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas56

My good friend Julie is one of the Texas delegates. She keeps updating her Facebook about it. She said lots of the Texas delegates have given up and not going to fight this rule. She’s hoping to change minds and is fighting!!


10 posted on 08/28/2012 10:33:07 AM PDT by Halls (Jesus is my Lord and Savior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
I've been saying for a long time that the solution to our problems will not be found through the electoral process. People run around in a panic and say that Obama is so terrible (and he is) that we simply must vote for Romney -- he's not great, but, hey, he's not Obama.

I say that's BS.

The country is going down in flames and we can't stop it. Voting for Romney won't stop it. I see no reason to vote in November. None. Nada. I'm waiting for the tree of liberty to be watered. My vote stopped counting a long time ago.

Back around 1940, some Americans thought that Hitler probably wasn't so bad -- he was friends with Joe Stalin, and that was pretty cool, huh? Then he invaded Russia and they ran around in a panic saying we had to support Stalin -- maybe Stalin wasn't perfect, but,hey, he wasn't Hitler.

Well, you can go vote for Stalin if you want, and you can tell everyone that you're saving the world from Hitler. As for me, I won't vote for Hitler and I won't vote for Stalin. You see ... I'm a Conservative.

11 posted on 08/28/2012 10:35:34 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Roger Taney? Not a bad Chief Justice. John Roberts? A really awful Chief Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I am HIGHLY pissed off at this and at what I fear will be coming out of the rules committee. It took me a while to come around and support Romney; now I’m beginning to think it may be best to forget Romney and let the house burn down with Obama leading it. We can rebuild and rebuild it right.

The GOPe wants to purge us? I think it time to seriously think about purging them.

Damn, I’m pissed!!!@ And I don’t what to do to prevent this at the last minute.


12 posted on 08/28/2012 10:35:39 AM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
More simply put ... “told ya”.

Yep

13 posted on 08/28/2012 10:36:16 AM PDT by Jagdgewehr (It will take blood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

So is it within the rules for Romney to replace the committee members?

I’m not clear on what the issue is.

Is this another response to Ron Paul trying to stack the delegates in his favor even though voters rejected him?

Anyway, looks like I might have some company in the third party vote line.


14 posted on 08/28/2012 10:36:25 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave; cripplecreek
Curse Romney's Sudden but Inevitable Betrayal!

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y275/Mortis_strike/funny-cat-pictures-curse-your-sudden-but-inevitable-betrayal.jpg

15 posted on 08/28/2012 10:39:11 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Normalcy results in the creation of life, Sodomy results in AIDS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Halls

Could someone post a quick summary of what is happening and what Romney hopes to acheive with it? It seems like every article I read on this brings me in at the halfway point and I’m having some trouble putting all the pieces together.

Romney is replacing delegates with his own to accomplish...what?


16 posted on 08/28/2012 10:40:16 AM PDT by Heavyrunner (Socialize this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

If things continue down this road (including his recent mealy-mouth abortion position)I’m getting the sense that this could be a transition election. Elect Romney, then either challenge him in 2016 or form a Tea Party third party.


17 posted on 08/28/2012 10:40:25 AM PDT by almcbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
I’m not clear on what the issue is.

Issues...

GOP Rules Committee Rapidly Moving to Shut Out Grassroots at 2:00 p.m. Today (It's not over)

18 posted on 08/28/2012 10:40:33 AM PDT by CedarDave (Palin/Ryan -- both should have been at the top of the ticket and not play second fiddle to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Really? Rush is downplaying it right now.


19 posted on 08/28/2012 10:41:39 AM PDT by jb729
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
"I see no reason to vote in November. None. Nada."

I'm going to vote, but not for these two clowns. I'm voting for Virgil Goode of the constitution party. I want my vote to be counted. I'm hoping that with help, to send a message to the GOP, that the Father of Obamacare and the Father of Gay Marriage was not an acceptable candidate. And that we want more change than just a GOP labeled Obama.

And if the GOP doesn't get the message, then I'm hoping to send a message to disgruntled GOP and Democrats that there is a growing third party alternative. (assuming it grows).

20 posted on 08/28/2012 10:42:09 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
I have no idea what the rules are for rule committee members. They are making a mistake if they try to railroad changes, even if the rules allow stacking the rules committee.

They can't change any convention rules unless the delegates on the floor vote the changes. What is the mix on the floor?

21 posted on 08/28/2012 10:42:38 AM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Can somebody explain why these rule changes are so important? I don't get it. Why should I care if certain delegates are on some committee, and others aren't? Does it actually matter? Romney's the candidate, Ryan's the Veep nominee, so what's the point of the rest of this stuff?

I'm not trying to be argumentative -- I honestly don't get it. Exactly who are these people being removed, and who put them in those places to be removed in the first place?

22 posted on 08/28/2012 10:43:08 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/5693/ripk.jpg

"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.”

-- John Quincy Adams

23 posted on 08/28/2012 10:44:21 AM PDT by KC_Lion (Normalcy results in the creation of life, Sodomy results in AIDS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

“Anyway, looks like I might have some company in the third party vote line.”

You and me both. I’ve been leaning Constitution party since Bloody Thursday, but have been holding out the hope Romney can win me back to the Republicans. That hope has all but faded now. If the conservative movement insists on living entirely within thus corrupt party, then we give them the power to destroy us. That’s a power not even the most radical leftist Democrat President has.


24 posted on 08/28/2012 10:44:52 AM PDT by LaserJock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Just spoke to my Minnesota Convention Committee Rules Rep and she stated MN is solid support on Minority Report and encourages us to call other states reps!!!

http://www.eagleforum.org/alert/2012/pdf/ConventionCommitteeonRulesOrdeofBusinessContactInfo.pdf


25 posted on 08/28/2012 10:47:08 AM PDT by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

*sheepish* I engaged in too much rhetoric. I also have every intention of voting for Virgil Goode.


26 posted on 08/28/2012 10:47:12 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Roger Taney? Not a bad Chief Justice. John Roberts? A really awful Chief Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jb729

Did he just receive his marching order?


27 posted on 08/28/2012 10:47:20 AM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Deceit and desperation by the GOP-e.

These idiots are fighting the wrong battle.

Where are the "don't give 0bama a vote by not supporting Romney" now when the GOP are disenfranchising the conservative core of the party?

28 posted on 08/28/2012 10:49:22 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

“Can somebody explain why these rule changes are so important?”

The establishment is setting the table for the next election. They’re creating a system where the nomination, political agenda, and platform building process will be completely and entirely under the control of a small number of party insiders - thus eliminating the influence of movements like the Tea Party. We can vote and march all day long, but at the end of the day the establishment types will pick the winners and set the political agenda with these changes.


29 posted on 08/28/2012 10:50:01 AM PDT by LaserJock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LaserJock

“That’s a power not even the most radical leftist Democrat President has.”

Where have you been, in a plastic bay? Can you not say OBAMA?


30 posted on 08/28/2012 10:50:01 AM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
“So who is it here that keeps saying “we’ll deal with Romney later?” No. You will not. Behold the dismantling of Conservatism. More simply put ... “told ya”.”

Yes, this is Romney/Bain brain at work. Dump the workers you don't want, and put your own people in those jobs, then you control the whole group of people. He wants control of the rules and he will get it by underhanded deception, but he is a successful business man - how do you think he did that? The same way he is trying to take over this rules committee.

Those supporting Romney put together a false image of him in their brain - they needed a savior from Hussein and put a halo above Romney because they wanted to. A vision is not real. Romney is a vision to those people and the vision just started melting away.

31 posted on 08/28/2012 10:50:44 AM PDT by Marcella (Conservatism is dead. PREPARE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Mr. RomneyCARE is excited, at last.

The partner of Soros, Mr. RomneyCARE smells the blood
of conservatives — and his vicious Team are all
over them.


32 posted on 08/28/2012 10:50:52 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session."- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

It’s patriotic for the GOP to do the same crap to conservatives they say Obama will.

Makes perfect sense to support our own demise....


33 posted on 08/28/2012 10:51:52 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven
Unintended good-thing consequences will come of this. For decades social conservatives and smaller-govt conservatives have taken solace that they had some influence at the convention in building the platform. Which, as we all know, is pretty much useless as the part all but ignores the platform after the convention. Maybe now those groups will spend more time focusing on things that matter: getting people who share their principles elected.

Roger that - until folks stop plaing "the game" we are doomed. The only question so far is when we reach the point of no return.

34 posted on 08/28/2012 10:53:12 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
Can somebody explain why these rule changes are so important? I don't get it. Why should I care if certain delegates are on some committee, and others aren't? Does it actually matter? Romney's the candidate, Ryan's the Veep nominee, so what's the point of the rest of this stuff?

I'm not trying to be argumentative -- I honestly don't get it. Exactly who are these people being removed, and who put them in those places to be removed in the first place?

It's all about the future of the party and keeping those upstart Tea Party supporters from upsetting the GOP-e apple cart.

Going forward it gives the national party apparatus control over delegate selection, front-loading of early primaries (winner takes all vs. proportional) and freedom to change rules between party conventions. All designed to minimize grassroots conservatives from having much influence.

It isn't about Ron Paul (though its convenient to blame him), but about a future candidate who is at odds with the GOP establishment.

35 posted on 08/28/2012 10:53:29 AM PDT by CedarDave (Palin/Ryan -- both should have been at the top of the ticket and not play second fiddle to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Mr. McDaniel,

I am supporting Romney and the GOP with a healthy suspicion based on our candidates very moderate past. I support the Tea Party agendas for conservative goevernance and believe their influence is URGENTLY needed in the GOP today. We really need Obama out and I expect Romney to make good on his campaign promises.

I have been dissappointed in our party in the last decade as the conservative values adopted and re-established by Reagan have steadily declined to the point of spurring a genuine conservative grass roots activism apparent in the Tea Party Movement.

I emphatically urge you to not accept rules changes that would silence the conservative influence that is rallying this nation and the GOP back to improve our great nation. The voters are taking some control over the governance of this nation. Establishment politicians have done plenty of damage. We need visionary patriots with America’s core values at heart and her future in mind to be governing to conservative standards.

The Rule 15 compromise and other rule changes are a slap in the face to the Tea Party and its supporters.

I and my family will register as Independents and consider our options if Romney’s rule changes go into effect.

Please share this e-mail with your colleagues. I may be but one voter. But the Tea Party and its supporters are watching VERY CAREFULLY these days.

Sincerely,


36 posted on 08/28/2012 10:53:52 AM PDT by Tenacious 1 (The Click-&-Paste Media exists & works in Utopia, riding unicorns & sniffing pixy dust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Pretty damn quick.


37 posted on 08/28/2012 10:54:40 AM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: elephant

“Can you not say OBAMA?”

I can. Can you not say Benedict Arnold?


38 posted on 08/28/2012 10:56:53 AM PDT by LaserJock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Heavyrunner

I’m glad I’m not the only one in the dark. The only reason for replacing that I see, is to stop the Paultards. Fox is saying half the covention is screaming RON PAUL and half is screaming MITT ROMNEY. I also heard Paul will not releae his delegates. Like I said yesterday, now is the time for a united front. Not infighting. Paul lost. They need to get over it and move on.


39 posted on 08/28/2012 10:57:12 AM PDT by mouse1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LaserJock

ie Mittens. Hell yes.


40 posted on 08/28/2012 10:57:36 AM PDT by elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jb729

I just listened to the first hour. He was pretty hard on the professionals who run the party.


41 posted on 08/28/2012 10:58:04 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

On one hand, I can say Romney and his supporters are wrong on principle on the rule changes they seek.

On the other hand I could say he and his group are not very politically savy, or maybe even politically stupid.

They may be in an uneasy alliance of convenience for the moment, in the GOP, with a GOP base that is more Conservative than they are, a base without whom they will not beat Obama, and they chose, and I mean chose, to stir up an internal GOP hornets nest at this time, before the general election?

Why? They have the nomination, so, they have another four years to go “in power” at the RNC if they win, so, in the long war it is really stupid to chose this particular battle at this time.

One thing for sure, it spells for a rocky road ahead for any President Romney with what will be a more Conservative GOP majority in at least the House if not both houses of Congress.


42 posted on 08/28/2012 10:59:20 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Thsnks for the info. It appears this is much deeper than Paul.


43 posted on 08/28/2012 10:59:33 AM PDT by mouse1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

Akin is not the problem. A GOP so off course that it could be manipulated into a Romney nomination is a real problem.


44 posted on 08/28/2012 10:59:33 AM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

“Can somebody explain why these rule changes are so important? I don’t get it. Why should I care if certain delegates are on some committee, and others aren’t? Does it actually matter? Romney’s the candidate, Ryan’s the Veep nominee, so what’s the point of the rest of this stuff?
I’m not trying to be argumentative — I honestly don’t get it. Exactly who are these people being removed, and who put them in those places to be removed in the first place?”

You should care because the aristocrats and oligarchs are choosing our leaders for us. They are setting up the machinery to ensure that only someone they choose will become the republican nominee ever again. How do you think we get such men as Gerald Ford, Robert Dole, George Bush and his son, and now Mitt Romney. They worked hand in hand to destroy Goldwater, and since Reagan’s two landslides, they’ve been working to ensure that a conservative never again gets the nomination because they cannot be controlled. They’ll pick someone and that’ll be it because where are we going to go, they’ll say.


45 posted on 08/28/2012 10:59:37 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: elephant

Mr. RomneyCARE has just proven that HE CANNOT BE TRUSTED.

The warnings were there before, but his Team
of Saboteurs took out the conservatives (a job they
feel is not finished).

Mr. RomneyCARE is an enemy of conservative issues.
All of them.


46 posted on 08/28/2012 11:00:26 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session."- Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Just sent emails to the two rules committee members of the Maryland delegation.


47 posted on 08/28/2012 11:00:35 AM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave; All
..as usual:
the (stupid) Grand Old Party; Is snatching "defeat" from the jaws of "victory"...
we'll never learn:
Nixon (RINO; who learnt from the lessons from the past..re-elected)
Ford (RINO, who lost re-election)
Reagan (re-elected)
G.H.W. Bush ("coat-tails" RINO, who lost re-election)
Dole (RINO, who lost)
G.W. Bush (CINO, re-elected)
McCain (RINO, who lost)
Romney????...sprinting to Liberal ME-TOOism???

48 posted on 08/28/2012 11:03:26 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; w/ different flie$" :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Done, to both my reps. No idea if they are receptive.


49 posted on 08/28/2012 11:05:51 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

I sent mine to the two NM rules committee delegates a couple of hours ago. But if party Romneybots have taken control and are removing and replacing delegates it may not do much good.


50 posted on 08/28/2012 11:07:32 AM PDT by CedarDave (Palin/Ryan -- both should have been at the top of the ticket and not play second fiddle to GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson