Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Parade of Bad Polls Continues
Powerline Blog ^ | 9-11-12 | John Hinderaker

Posted on 09/11/2012 4:32:00 AM PDT by radioone

Pointing out the flaws in worthless polls would be a full-time job, if anyone were willing to undertake it. Today’s example comes from CNN and ORC. News organizations report on polls like this one as though they meant something; this one will be popular with media organizations because it shows President Obama with a six-point lead over Mitt Romney among likely voters. But a cursory review of the poll data shows that if it means anything at all, it is good news for Romney.

To begin with, the CNN/ORC poll follows on the heels of another survey by the same organizations two weeks earlier. The findings–based, obviously, on a small sample–suggest that four percent of voters changed their minds about the Democratic Party over the space of two weeks:

That is, of course, ridiculous. What happened, rather, is that the second sample contained a lot more Democrats than the first one.

If the CNN/ORC poll contains any significant finding, it is this: independents favored Romney over Obama by 14%. That’s right, 14%:

If Romney carries independents by anything like that margin, the election won’t be close. The pollsters found that virtually all Democrats are voting for Obama and virtually all Republicans are voting for Romney, so someone with quicker math skills than mine can pretty quickly figure out how much they had to over-sample Democrats to come out with Obama winning by six points.

Really, this whole exercise is getting tiresome. Yet one question remains: where is the poll that over-samples Republicans?

UPDATE: A commenter calculates:

to get to those totals the following breakdown works…

D – 38. I – 36. R – 26.

that’s D+12, right…


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; democrats; obama; republicans; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Lazamataz

why they bother including ANY Republicans in the sample?

Window dressing.


21 posted on 09/11/2012 5:54:54 AM PDT by Kolath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: radioone

The WashPost+ABC Poll must have been shamed into making some changes to move by 6 points in a day

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2929345/posts?page=1


22 posted on 09/11/2012 5:55:12 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

If Obama and Holder can sue Gallup, maybe Mitt should follow suit. Seriously, this is fraud.


23 posted on 09/11/2012 5:56:32 AM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

10 point oversample.... even though GOP reportedly has more registered voters this year.


24 posted on 09/11/2012 5:57:16 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Andrei Bulba
But are some of these pollsters claiming they randomize their method of contacting people, and then the party ID is whatever they happen to get from that “random” sample?

That is a good question.

The way it is SUPPOSED to work is that you poll X number of people, determine how many are R, D, I, Black, Brown, White, Young, Old, ... and then take this data and, with your own special sauce to get the right demographic mix you adjust the results based on your TURNOUT MODEL. In a nutshell the R/D/I split is the turnout model. This R/D/I split should be independent of the actual distribution of Republicans, Democrats and Independents who actually answer the phone for the poll in question. If it is done this way then there is no WEEKEND EFFECT, a false idea widely accepted here on FR that Dems poll better on weekends. OTOH, that belief could be correct if the pollster in question uses the distribution of R/D/I based on who answered the phone.

So what are they doing now? Who knows.

Well, as you have probably noticed, this so called turnout model is all over the map these days but is almost universally predicting a huge Dem turnout compared to the number of Republicans who will actually vote.

And what is the rationale for applying this Dem favored model? Answer: The hoped for effect of propaganda on the voting population.

That propaganda campaign worked even here on FR for a few days. I think it's fading as we dig out the facts about these polls.

25 posted on 09/11/2012 6:00:52 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: radioone

That independent number has to worry the Democrats, a lot.


26 posted on 09/11/2012 6:04:00 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Take two Aspirin and call me in November - Obama for Hindmost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrei Bulba

apparently at this point there are more registered GOP than Dems. So this poll is pretty whacked.


27 posted on 09/11/2012 6:04:01 AM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: radioone

Even with the sample stacked against him, Romney should be up 15 - 20 points! The real unemployment rate is much higher than even the critics claim, and all that is being done is 0bama is campaigning and fundraising!


28 posted on 09/11/2012 6:04:36 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ("Get that evil, foreign, muslim, usurping bastard out of MY White House!" FUBO GTFO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone

I see the average idiot on the street and the libs on my facebook page.

I have no doubt Romney is losing. Romney is running the worst possible campaign imaginable and inspires zero confidence whatsoever.

I’ll vote for him any day over RR, but this campaign really sucks TBH.

I am disgusted.


29 posted on 09/11/2012 6:07:35 AM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radioone

CNN/ORC is a joke. Vinod Gupta is the owner of ORC, and special good buddy of Bill Clinton’s. The guy will do anything to make the Dems look good. Proof was when he screwed over the stockholders of his other company to fund the purchase of ORC so he could manipulate the numbers for the Clintons.


30 posted on 09/11/2012 6:11:59 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrei Bulba
I'm not sure how they are doing it. I'm guessing they first ask the last question, "What is your party identification?" When they get a % of Ds they want, they stop taking any more responses from Ds. So it HAS to be predetermined what their mix is.

They would not just call 1000 people and take whoever answered the phone, because you might get 1000 Ds or 1000Rs by accident.

31 posted on 09/11/2012 6:13:26 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: radioone

I agree. Now, Rush and some Freepers think it is to depress turnout. I don’t think so. Rs are NOT going to be dissuaded from voting, and Is aren’t paying attention much.

I offered this theory a couple of months ago: I think they KNOW Romney is going to win pretty big in the EC (310-320). It might be closer in pop vote, but he’ll win that. I think the media will say, “How can this BE? ALL the polls told us that Obama was leading? This must be Republican dirty tricks!” as a means of discrediting and delegitimatizing Romney’s presidency as they tried to do with Bush in 2000 (”selected,” not “elected”).


32 posted on 09/11/2012 6:16:05 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote
Be patient, it's very close and Romney has not begun the barrage of ads with his money advantage.

If his ads suck, and if he doesn't take it to Bambi starting at the end of the next couple of weeks, and he has a horrible first debate, then we can panic (and be disgusted).

It's not like we shouldn't get used to being disappointed with the Mittster, right?

It's simply too early to throw in the towel.

33 posted on 09/11/2012 6:26:20 AM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: radioone; All

I hate to throw a wet towel on any of this but something has always struck me when claims of oversampling are made to make a poll look good:

Isn’t it reasonable to assume that when a particular group is oversampled, the pollster in question takes that into account, and gives the group undersampled more weight?

For example, if the Republicans are undersampled by say 5%, their final tally is given 5% more weight than the Democrats.

That’s how it’s done in certain areas of science I can attest. For example, if one particular protein shows more expression in a certain experiment on a Western blot, such expression levels are normalized against a more common protein like actin. If the actin levels demonstrate lower levels in the experimental conditions (an oversampling if you will of the experimental condition), then the experimental level is reported as a function of the actin, that is, it’s divided by the amount of actin (similarly for the control), so as to normalize all levels based on how much total protein was actually loaded onto the gel (the Western blot).

So again, isn’t it reasonable to assume these pollsters are doing a similar kind of normalization?


34 posted on 09/11/2012 6:28:05 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
If R/R win, I'm most fearful of the racial aspect in all this.

Bambi has played the race card with such virulence, the hatred and violence that could be released after election day will be the thing the MSM uses to deligitimize R/R.

35 posted on 09/11/2012 6:29:57 AM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: radioone

“That’s not a poll, that’s propaganda.”

That is what polling was always intended to be from day one. It was always propaganda because the general public believes in numbers. Most never look at the details and even those that do can’t interpret them properly.


36 posted on 09/11/2012 7:08:15 AM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (We're an Oligrachy...Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: erkyl

Liberalism will never produce real progress by any true measure. It is based upon arrogance; so, it never objectively evaluates the outcomes of its actions. That is why the “progressives” (communists) only offer excuses when their ideas fail, and all of their ideas ALWAYS fail.


37 posted on 09/11/2012 7:12:13 AM PDT by caprock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: LS

OStinkBugula and DemoRat propaganda just like I’ve been suspecting.

Their sampling does not reflect reality which is a nearly 5% advantage for the GOP in voter registration. They are just trying to get nervous nelly weak minded people in our party to get discouraged and not show up to vote. We must get faces like flint with this crowd. This election is war and for the survival of the republic. May God curse these evil vermin and bring them to utter defeat.


38 posted on 09/11/2012 7:40:57 AM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I know. That’s certainly something they are looking for.


39 posted on 09/11/2012 7:50:08 AM PDT by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
D+12????

Makes no difference. Some folks will continue to have large mudslides in their diapers when they see these PHONY polls revealing an Obama advantage.

40 posted on 09/11/2012 7:56:27 AM PDT by PJ-Comix (Beware the Rip in the Space/Time Continuum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson