Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Mosques Should Be Shut Down
Logans Warning ^ | 9.13.2012 | Christopher Logan

Posted on 09/13/2012 4:08:56 PM PDT by Morgana

Let’s face it friends. What is being done by non-Muslims in this war is not even coming close to saving our future generations from Islamic rule. Muslims have successfully turned our freedoms into a tool of Islam, nation building didn’t work out the way President Bush thought it would, and “moderate” Muslims are not coming to the rescue. The way I see it is that we will eventually lose this war if there are no major changes in our laws and actions. The first changes should be for America to become energy independent and then end all Muslim immigration. For it is a Trojan Horse. Even after those actions we would still be left with IslamoBLOB slowly devouring America.

Great leaders such as Geert Wilders see this, and that is why he is calling for an end to Mosque Construction. He sees that the West has had more than enough Islam. So has a friend of ours who has been warning America to the threat of Islam for 40 years! That friend is Mr. Martel Sobieskey, a true patriot. Here is his latest…

(Excerpt) Read more at loganswarning.com ...


TOPICS: Religion
KEYWORDS: islam; jihad; mosque; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

1 posted on 09/13/2012 4:09:01 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

It’s unconstitutional. You can’t pick and choose when it comes to religion and the First Amendment. Because, be assured, one day they will shut your Church down if we go down that path.


2 posted on 09/13/2012 4:18:04 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
mosqgobooom... i'm kinda partial to #1

...#1...

...#2...

...#3...

3 posted on 09/13/2012 4:22:24 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

It ceased to be a religion and became a terrorist organization on 9-11.


4 posted on 09/13/2012 4:22:40 PM PDT by Morgana (Time to play cowboys and muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Why Mosques Should Be Shut Down

The Constitution was put in place, at least in part, to help guard against such Tyrannical, oversimplified "solutions"...

5 posted on 09/13/2012 4:27:31 PM PDT by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
There is no constitutional right for Saudi Arabia to build muslim colonies in the US. Congress can easily shut off the money flow.

There is no right to preach violence. The first time an imam preaches jihad, shut the mosque down.

Despite the rulings of a couple of Leftists judges, there is no Constitutional right to a parallel sharia law system either. Congress can pass legislation to preclude judges from allowing implementation.

States can ban the teaching of all things muslim in public schools.

6 posted on 09/13/2012 4:29:36 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
It ceased to be a religion and became a terrorist organization on 9-11.

The problem with this is, who determines whether Islam is a religion or a terrorist organization? The moment we the people grant the government the power the power to designate a purported religion as a non-religion, and thus strip it of First Amendment rights, is the moment the First Amendment ceases to exist.

7 posted on 09/13/2012 4:30:44 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; All

.

Saudi Publications on Hate Ideology Invade American Mosques

In January of 2006, Freedom House’s Center for Religious Freedom released a new report exposing the dissemination of hate propaganda in America by the government of Saudi Arabia.

The 89-page report, “Saudi Publications on Hate Ideology Fill American Mosques,” is based on a year-long study of over two hundred original documents, all disseminated, published or otherwise generated by the government of Saudi Arabia and collected from more than a dozen mosques in the United States.

The propagation of hate ideology by Saudi Arabia is known to be worldwide, but its occurrence within the United States has received scant attention until now. Within worldwide Sunni Islam, followers of Saudi Arabia’s extremist Wahhabi ideology are a distinct minority, as is evident by the millions of Muslims who have chosen to make America their home and are upstanding, law-abiding citizens and neighbors.

The report concludes that the Saudi government propaganda examined reflects a “totalitarian ideology of hatred that can incite to violence,” and the fact that it is “being mainstreamed within our borders through the efforts of a foreign government, namely Saudi Arabia, demands our urgent attention.” The report finds: “Not only does the government of Saudi Arabia not have a right – under the First Amendment or any other legal document – to spread hate ideology within U.S. borders, it is committing a human rights violation by doing so.”

Such publications that “advocate an ideology of hatred have no place in a nation founded on religious freedom and toleration,” write James Woolsey, chairman of the board of Freedom House, in the foreword to the report.

Among the key findings of the report:

• Various Saudi government publications gathered for this study, most of which are in Arabic, assert that it is a religious obligation for Muslims to hate Christians and Jews and warn against imitating, befriending, or helping them in any way, or taking part in their festivities and celebrations;

• The documents promote contempt for the United States because it is ruled by legislated civil law rather than by totalitarian Wahhabi-style Islamic law. They condemn democracy as un-Islamic;

• The documents stress that when Muslims are in the lands of the unbelievers, they must behave as if on a mission behind enemy lines. Either they are there to acquire new knowledge and make money to be later employed in the jihad against the infidels, or they are there to proselytize the infidels until at least some convert to Islam. Any other reason for lingering among the unbelievers in their lands is illegitimate, and unless a Muslim leaves as quickly as possible, he or she is not a true Muslim and so too must be condemned. For example, a document in the collection for the “Immigrant Muslim” bears the words “Greetings from the Cultural Attache in Washington, D.C.” of the Embassy of Saudi Arabia, and is published by the government of Saudi Arabia. In an authoritative religious voice, it gives detailed instructions on how to “hate” the Christian and Jew: Never greet them first. Never congratulate the infidel on his holiday. Never imitate the infidel. Do not become a naturalized citizen of the United States. Do not wear a graduation gown because this imitates the infidel;

• One insidious aspect of the Saudi propaganda examined is its aim to replace traditional and moderate interpretations of Islam with extremist Wahhabism, the officially-established religion of Saudi Arabia. In these documents, other Muslims, especially those who advocate tolerance, are condemned as infidels. The opening fatwa in one Saudi embassy-distributed book, published by the Saudi Air Force, responds to a question about a Muslim preacher in a European mosque who taught that it is not right to condemn Jews and Christians as infidels. The Saudi state cleric’s reply rebukes the Muslim cleric: “He who casts doubts about their infidelity leaves no doubt about his.” Since, under Saudi law, “apostates” from Islam can be sentenced to death, this is an implied death threat against the tolerant Muslim imam, as well as an incitement to vigilante violence;

• Sufi and Shiite Muslims are viciously condemned;

• For a Muslim who fails to uphold the Saudi Wahhabi sect’s sexual mores (i.e. through homosexual activity or heterosexual activity outside of marriage), the edicts published by the Saudi government’s Ministry of Islamic Affairs, and found in American mosques advise, “it would be lawful for Muslims to spill his blood and to take his money;”

• Regarding those who convert out of Islam, the Saudi Ministry of Islamic Affairs explicitly asserts, they “should be killed;”

• Saudi textbooks and other publications in the collection, propagate a Nazi-like hatred for Jews, treat the forged Protocols of the Elders of Zion as historical fact, and avow that the Muslim’s duty is to eliminate the state of Israel;

• Regarding women, the Saudi publications instruct that they should be veiled, segregated from men and barred from certain employment and roles;

The report states: “While the government of Saudi Arabia claims to be ‘updating’ or reforming its textbooks and study materials within the Kingdom, its publications propagating an ideology of hatred remain plentiful in some prominent American mosques and Islamic centers, and continue to be a principal resource available to students of Islam within the United States.”

The research, translation and principle analysis of the materials for the report were carried out by both Muslims and non-Muslims who wish to remain anonymous for reasons of security. Some 90 percent of the publications are in Arabic; two independent translators reviewed each Arabic document. This project was undertaken after many Muslims requested the Center’s help in exposing Saudi extremism in the hope of freeing their communities from ideological strangulation.

Read the full report here.
http://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/inline_images/Saudi%20Publications%20on%20Hate%20Ideology%20Invade%20American%20Mosques.pdf

.


8 posted on 09/13/2012 4:31:10 PM PDT by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

BTW, Christianity is not only consistent with our Constitution, it is the basis of it.

Islam is anachronistic to our Constitution.


9 posted on 09/13/2012 4:32:49 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Number 2 was SWEET!!

got anymore?


10 posted on 09/13/2012 4:34:35 PM PDT by Morgana (Time to play cowboys and muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

And what do you call it when Eric Holder is releasing the name of the person or persons who made the Mohammad movie? Or that General calling that Preacher down south? Both have freedom of speech and that freedom of speech still goes even if they make fun of muzzies. We either end islam now or more of this sh!t will happen.


11 posted on 09/13/2012 4:36:46 PM PDT by Morgana (Time to play cowboys and muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
There is no right to preach violence.

Actually, there is. The Supreme Court has held that the government cannot prohibit speech that advocates violence, unless that speech constitutes an incitement to imminent lawless action. Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969).

12 posted on 09/13/2012 4:37:12 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

I agree with you. Islam is anti constitution.


13 posted on 09/13/2012 4:37:54 PM PDT by Morgana (Time to play cowboys and muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
An islamic terror group preaches violence. When preached at your local mosque, it should be shut down.

Our Bill of Rights is not a suicide pact.

All members of the islamic faith should be denied resident status and citizenship. Islam is anathema to our traditions and dangerous to our republic.

14 posted on 09/13/2012 4:39:37 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All
Photobucket
15 posted on 09/13/2012 4:40:38 PM PDT by Morgana (Time to play cowboys and muslims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

BS. Tell your neighbor you wish to do him harm. See what happens.


16 posted on 09/13/2012 4:40:46 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Instead of trying to close mosques, how about cutting off Muslim immigration? We are importing 100,000 Muslims a year. They have no “right” to immigrate here. In fact nobody does. Let’s stop taking in Muslim immigrants.
We need an immigration moratorium anyway.


17 posted on 09/13/2012 4:41:20 PM PDT by River Hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Cease to recognize Islam as a religion. Problem solved.


18 posted on 09/13/2012 4:42:26 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
And what do you call it when Eric Holder is releasing the name of the person or persons who made the Mohammad movie? Or that General calling that Preacher down south? Both have freedom of speech and that freedom of speech still goes even if they make fun of muzzies.

I call those unconstitutional activities that have the effect of chilling speech that is protected by the First Amendment. Just like shutting down all mosques would be an unconstitutional activity that restricts religious freedom protected by the First Amendment.

19 posted on 09/13/2012 4:42:32 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
no...
20 posted on 09/13/2012 4:43:05 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
It’s unconstitutional. You can’t pick and choose when it comes to religion and the First Amendment. Because, be assured, one day they will shut your Church down if we go down that path.

It's constitutional if it can be shown that islam is not a religion in the meaning or spirit or intent of the 1st Amendment.

That should take, gee, about all of 30 seconds to prove beyond a shadow of doubt - complete with evidence of actual Muslims screaming for murder and agreeing that the purpose of Islam is the complete and utter destruction of America and the ensalving or murder of its population.

Actually, I think I can do it in ten seconds.

Or less.

21 posted on 09/13/2012 4:43:07 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
All members of the islamic faith should be denied resident status and citizenship. Islam is anathema to our traditions and dangerous to our republic.

I would posit that your attitude is anatema to our traditions and dangerous to our republic. Yes, we need to deal with the threat of Islamic extremism. But doing so by prohibiting Islam as a whole is not the way to do it, and is un-American.

22 posted on 09/13/2012 4:45:28 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
BS. Tell your neighbor you wish to do him harm. See what happens.

That's a direct threat. My point is that simply advocating violence generally, without being a direct threat/assault and without inciting imminent lawless action, is protected speech according to 40-plus year old SCOTUS precedent.

23 posted on 09/13/2012 4:47:53 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
Unlimited immigration without assimilation is death to a republic.

That is why The Pig Kennedy (D-Hell) and his rat cohorts worked so hard to allow open borders. Muslims are just another divisive group allowed unlimited access. The intent it to destroy our society and drive us toward despotic rule.

For a smart guy you should know this.

24 posted on 09/13/2012 4:47:53 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
The problem with this is, who determines whether Islam is a religion or a terrorist organization? The moment we the people grant the government the power the power to designate a purported religion as a non-religion, and thus strip it of First Amendment rights, is the moment the First Amendment ceases to exist.

Well you could just ask the IRS. After all, they determine religious authenticity all the time. Just try telling them you should be exsmpt because of your religion, and watch how fast they make an administrative ruling on the interpretation of the application of the definition of the 1st Amendment in your case.

The entire purpose of government is to make decision and draw lines. Is it bad if I shoot you dead because I don't like you, but okay if I shout Allahu Akbar first, and claim I'm following my religion?

Grow the hell up, or go play with the morons in the DU sandbox and stop wasting people's time here. If you haven't noticed, our country is under attack, and adults are having a conversation.

25 posted on 09/13/2012 4:49:56 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
Okay. Tell your neighbor you intend to kick his butt within a year or two and see what happens.

Oh, and Congress should use its Article III powers to neuter the commie blackrobes. I kind of like Newt's idea of disestablishing the Ninth Circus, send the tyrants home and start over. No messy impeachments.

26 posted on 09/13/2012 4:50:47 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

But Islam isn’t a religion. It is a political organization of murder, rape, and conquest that pretends to be a religion.


27 posted on 09/13/2012 4:55:37 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

“The entire purpose of government is to make decision and draw lines.”

Sorry, but I don’t want the government to have that kind of power.
Islam is a recognized religion, not one I agree with but the threat of Muslim terrorists isn’t nearly so scary to me as a Federal Government with the power to declare wich established religions are legit.


28 posted on 09/13/2012 5:01:43 PM PDT by snarkybob (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Well you could just ask the IRS. After all, they determine religious authenticity all the time. Just try telling them you should be exsmpt because of your religion, and watch how fast they make an administrative ruling on the interpretation of the application of the definition of the 1st Amendment in your case.

The IRS determination on this issue is largely a subjective analysis - e.g., they verify whether you genuinely hold religious beliefs or whether you are merely purporting to hold such beliefs in order to gain tax advantages. They do not conduct any substantive analysis of the purported religious beliefs themselves.

The entire purpose of government is to make decision and draw lines. Is it bad if I shoot you dead because I don't like you, but okay if I shout Allahu Akbar first, and claim I'm following my religion?

Of course not. Laws against murder (and other crimes) are laws of general applicability that apply regardless of whether the conduct is purportedly done for religious reasons. There is actually Supreme Court caselaw on this issue - not concerning murder, but concerning drug laws. You can't take drugs and then claim that you were doing so because your religion required it, even if such drug use is a real part of your religious beliefs. So, in your example, if Islam "required" you to shoot me dead, your 'right' to shoot me would not be protected by the First Amendment, but your right to believe in Islam would.

Grow the hell up, or go play with the morons in the DU sandbox and stop wasting people's time here. If you haven't noticed, our country is under attack, and adults are having a conversation.

I understand that we are under attack, and I am trying to be part of the conversation. Just because I happen to believe that outright banning Islam is not the solution, and is unconstitutional, does not mean that I need to "[g]row the hell up," nor does it mean I belong on DU.

29 posted on 09/13/2012 5:03:57 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Well you could just ask the IRS. After all, they determine religious authenticity all the time. Just try telling them you should be exsmpt because of your religion, and watch how fast they make an administrative ruling on the interpretation of the application of the definition of the 1st Amendment in your case.

The IRS determination on this issue is largely a subjective analysis - e.g., they verify whether you genuinely hold religious beliefs or whether you are merely purporting to hold such beliefs in order to gain tax advantages. They do not conduct any substantive analysis of the purported religious beliefs themselves.

The entire purpose of government is to make decision and draw lines. Is it bad if I shoot you dead because I don't like you, but okay if I shout Allahu Akbar first, and claim I'm following my religion?

Of course not. Laws against murder (and other crimes) are laws of general applicability that apply regardless of whether the conduct is purportedly done for religious reasons. There is actually Supreme Court caselaw on this issue - not concerning murder, but concerning drug laws. You can't take drugs and then claim that you were doing so because your religion required it, even if such drug use is a real part of your religious beliefs. So, in your example, if Islam "required" you to shoot me dead, your 'right' to shoot me would not be protected by the First Amendment, but your right to believe in Islam would.

Grow the hell up, or go play with the morons in the DU sandbox and stop wasting people's time here. If you haven't noticed, our country is under attack, and adults are having a conversation.

I understand that we are under attack, and I am trying to be part of the conversation. Just because I happen to believe that outright banning Islam is not the solution, and is unconstitutional, does not mean that I need to "[g]row the hell up," nor does it mean I belong on DU.

30 posted on 09/13/2012 5:04:47 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Okay. Tell your neighbor you intend to kick his butt within a year or two and see what happens.

Again, that is conduct directed at your neighbor. Harassment. If, on the other hand, you said to another friend, "someone should really kick my neighbor's butt," that would be protected speech, unless your words were intended to incite (or you believed your words would incite) your friend to kick his butt. But merely advocating violence, as opposed to inciting it or threatening it, is protected speech.

31 posted on 09/13/2012 5:10:25 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: snarkybob
Islam is a recognized religion,

To recognize it better, take a holiday in Dearborn, Michigan.

Dearborn and adjacent Detroit are what we have to look forward to if the rat and muzzie jihad against our civil society are not stopped.

32 posted on 09/13/2012 5:11:19 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
We need to show them the same respect they show US!

No more mosques! No repairs to existing mosques!

No muslims allowed in the USA. Only muslims are allowed in Meccacca, they can allah go there!

33 posted on 09/13/2012 5:11:48 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (I'd rather have a bottle in front of me, than a Barack 0b0tt0my!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

“To recognize it better, take a holiday in Dearborn, Michigan.
Dearborn and adjacent Detroit are what we have to look forward to if the rat and muzzie jihad against our civil society are not stopped.”

Didn’t Boston once feel that same way about Irish Catholics?


34 posted on 09/13/2012 5:14:50 PM PDT by snarkybob (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Do you consider Islam to be a threat to our republic, our enemy?


35 posted on 09/13/2012 5:15:16 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I’ve never seen a Catholic or Protestant church with concertina wire around it keeping people out.


36 posted on 09/13/2012 5:16:19 PM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Those citizens who would defend America, would do well to consider them enemy armories.

That’s how they’ve been used in the Mid-East!


37 posted on 09/13/2012 5:33:03 PM PDT by G Larry (Progressives are Regressive because their objectives devolve to the lowest common denominator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

We are not talking about a religion here. What religion would be so violent? We are talking about an ideology masquerading as a religion. Keep them out of America


38 posted on 09/13/2012 5:42:20 PM PDT by paguch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; All

Instead of closing Mosques...we need to be more honest about Islam, and, we need the media to stop covering up the truth about Islam

Sad is that we have a number posting on here who blame this “film”, Pastor Terry Jones, anyone else accurately describing Islam...as the cause of the recent wave of Islamic Terrorism.

Being honest about Islam will do more than anything.


39 posted on 09/13/2012 6:08:54 PM PDT by SeminoleCounty (The DNC Convention is like the Nuremburg Rallies for non-white folks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

I consider Islamic terrorism a threat to our republic and our enemy. I don’t consider banning Mosques to be an effective or Constitutional solution to the threat.


40 posted on 09/13/2012 6:24:02 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

“It’s unconstitutional. You can’t pick and choose when it comes to religion and the First Amendment.”

Were Islam a religion, your argument would be worth discussion. However, Islam is a culture of desert savages fixated on the 7th Century barbarisms of Mad Mo.

When a soi dissant ‘religion’ has core beliefs which are antithetical to the Constitution, and also irreconcilable to the Constitution - then, said ‘religion’ can and must be removed from America.

PS A strong case can be made for removing Islam from the face of the earth.


41 posted on 09/13/2012 6:49:05 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

“It’s unconstitutional. You can’t pick and choose when it comes to religion and the First Amendment. Because, be assured, one day they will shut your Church down if we go down that path.”

The Constitution, including the First Amendment, is not a suicide pact.

The Founders who wrote both the Constitution and the first ten amendments did so with the presumption that those who would live and be governed by its provisions would do so with good will and with an understanding of its principles.

Islamics do neither. Instead, they will use the protection afforded them by the First Amendment to accumulate power until they have husbanded enough of same to wrest control of our nation away from us. And then, the First Amendment, along with the others that follow, will be torn up and something else installed in its place.

We saw the Nazis manipulate the system to gain leverage and power in Europe. Islam will do the same wherever it’s permitted to gain a strong enough foothold.

I don’t for one minute ascribe to what you wrote above.

We either stand up to Islam and stop it — and that includes closing the mosques and perhaps even removing Islamics from Western soil — or, we do nothing (because our own laws prevent us from doing so), and deny Islam’s growing threat among us until that threat becomes so powerful that we can no longer ignore it, or perhaps even stop it.

I say stop them now, whatever it takes.
Yes, this may be “an end justifies the means” attitude.
But it’s EXACTLY the same approach Islam will use to conquer The West.

Moral platitudes and “higher ground” doesn’t work against those who won’t play by the same rules....

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” does not work with Islam.

The West had better learn this, and learn it quickly....


42 posted on 09/13/2012 7:40:27 PM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

there is a duty in the US to support the Constitution. not overthrow it.

i wouldn’t even allow the communist party to be organized in the US.

nor a “religion” that would place the population under ‘sharia’ law.

neither are compatible with the Constitution.

blessings, bobo


43 posted on 09/13/2012 8:39:08 PM PDT by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

“Cease to recognize Islam as a religion. Problem solved”

I agree. We need to re-catagorize Islam for what it is, an ideology.


44 posted on 09/13/2012 8:39:58 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; RIghtwardHo; Chode; sargon; Jacquerie; Conscience of a Conservative; patriot08; ...
Well if you don't like the mosques we've got now, brace yourself for lots more. Obammy just spent a fortune to bring thousands more in via executive order, of course: Read it and weep!

You just spent $20,000,000 to move members/supporters of Hamas, a terrorist organization, to the United States; housing, food, transportation, the whole enchilada.

HB 1388 PASSED

Whether you are an Obama fan, or not, EVERYONE IN THE U.S. Needs to know....

H.R. 1388 was passed, behind our backs. You may want to read about it...

It wasn't mentioned on the news... Just went by on the ticker tape at the bottom of the CNN screen. Obama funds $20M in tax payer dollars to immigrate Hamas Refugees to the USA. This is the news that did not, and will not, make the headlines.

By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of $20.3 million in "migration assistance" to the Palestinian refugees and "conflict victims" in Gaza ..

The "presidential determination" (ain't that nice?) which allows hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the United States, was signed and appears in the Federal Register.

Few on Capitol Hill, or in the media, took note that the order provides a free ticket replete with housing, transportation and food allowances to individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support to the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of January 2006.

Now we learn that he is allowing thousands of Palestinian refuges to move to, and live in, the US at American taxpayer expense.

These important, and insightful, issues are being "lost" in the blinding bail-outs and "stimulation" packages.

Doubtful? To verify this for yourself:

www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2009-02-04-E9-2488

The $20.3 million dollar question is, will Romney put a quick stop to this if he wins?

45 posted on 09/13/2012 8:53:30 PM PDT by holyscroller ( Without God, America is one nation under)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The State Dept is warning of possible attacks here in the US. Faith based organizations should be watching for terrorist’s who might be casing for an attack.

We knew this was coming.

Check out my blog about terrorism in the US. War News Flash http://warnewsflash.blogspot.com/


46 posted on 09/13/2012 10:28:36 PM PDT by garjog (We do not want another four more years of the last four years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller
Trimmed and posted to FB


By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of $20.3 million in "migration assistance" to the Palestinian refugees and "conflict victims" in Gaza .

The order provides a free ticket replete with housing, transportation and food allowances to individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support to the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of January 2006.

www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2009-02-04-E9-2488

I guess we dont have any hungry homeless Americans to take care of!

47 posted on 09/13/2012 11:34:43 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (I'd rather have a bottle in front of me, than a Barack 0b0tt0my!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Religious freedom is one thing. Tolerance of ALL religions is quite another; sects like the murderous cult of Kali are not compatible with orderly society, which is why the Brits destroyed them in India.

All manner of peoples and faiths have come to this country, and at present, live peacefully with one another. Culturally, despite race-baiting whiners, we're past racism, and I see evidence that most Americans want a civil society, they do not care a whole lot about racial classifications, and they do not obsess about popes.

We actually all play together rather well, except for one group, the Muslims, who come here and tell us not only must we accommodate them, we must become them. Islam is a political movement wrapped in a deceptive headscarf; it's not a religion the way the Baptists are, or the Wiccans. Wiccans won't chop your head off if you imply they are Satanists, they'll just be unhappy.

I think it's time to let the industrial strength Islamists to live out their primitive wishes in isolation from the rest of the world--most of us are disgusted with the brutality and abuse, but leaving them to smash each other in home countries and leave us alone is better than having them next door planning political chaos.

Yep, it's messy, but remember, they are not Baptists, Wiccans, Taoists, Animists, or Jews. Time to close the mosques, because we know they are political centers. Time for people to pack up and head east if they want sharia, because we don't want it here.
48 posted on 09/13/2012 11:38:15 PM PDT by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
>"Number 2 was SWEET!!

Oh Yeah!!!!!!

I was worried for a while.

49 posted on 09/13/2012 11:45:28 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (I'd rather have a bottle in front of me, than a Barack 0b0tt0my!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller; Conscience of a Conservative
I hope they are housed with section 8 vouchers in Conscience of a Conservative’s neighborhood, where they can exercise their “constitutional rights.”
50 posted on 09/14/2012 2:09:37 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Exterminate rats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson