Skip to comments.Why Mosques Should Be Shut Down
Posted on 09/13/2012 4:08:56 PM PDT by Morgana
Lets face it friends. What is being done by non-Muslims in this war is not even coming close to saving our future generations from Islamic rule. Muslims have successfully turned our freedoms into a tool of Islam, nation building didnt work out the way President Bush thought it would, and moderate Muslims are not coming to the rescue. The way I see it is that we will eventually lose this war if there are no major changes in our laws and actions. The first changes should be for America to become energy independent and then end all Muslim immigration. For it is a Trojan Horse. Even after those actions we would still be left with IslamoBLOB slowly devouring America.
Great leaders such as Geert Wilders see this, and that is why he is calling for an end to Mosque Construction. He sees that the West has had more than enough Islam. So has a friend of ours who has been warning America to the threat of Islam for 40 years! That friend is Mr. Martel Sobieskey, a true patriot. Here is his latest
(Excerpt) Read more at loganswarning.com ...
It’s unconstitutional. You can’t pick and choose when it comes to religion and the First Amendment. Because, be assured, one day they will shut your Church down if we go down that path.
It ceased to be a religion and became a terrorist organization on 9-11.
The Constitution was put in place, at least in part, to help guard against such Tyrannical, oversimplified "solutions"...
There is no right to preach violence. The first time an imam preaches jihad, shut the mosque down.
Despite the rulings of a couple of Leftists judges, there is no Constitutional right to a parallel sharia law system either. Congress can pass legislation to preclude judges from allowing implementation.
States can ban the teaching of all things muslim in public schools.
The problem with this is, who determines whether Islam is a religion or a terrorist organization? The moment we the people grant the government the power the power to designate a purported religion as a non-religion, and thus strip it of First Amendment rights, is the moment the First Amendment ceases to exist.
Saudi Publications on Hate Ideology Invade American Mosques
In January of 2006, Freedom House’s Center for Religious Freedom released a new report exposing the dissemination of hate propaganda in America by the government of Saudi Arabia.
The 89-page report, “Saudi Publications on Hate Ideology Fill American Mosques,” is based on a year-long study of over two hundred original documents, all disseminated, published or otherwise generated by the government of Saudi Arabia and collected from more than a dozen mosques in the United States.
The propagation of hate ideology by Saudi Arabia is known to be worldwide, but its occurrence within the United States has received scant attention until now. Within worldwide Sunni Islam, followers of Saudi Arabia’s extremist Wahhabi ideology are a distinct minority, as is evident by the millions of Muslims who have chosen to make America their home and are upstanding, law-abiding citizens and neighbors.
The report concludes that the Saudi government propaganda examined reflects a “totalitarian ideology of hatred that can incite to violence,” and the fact that it is “being mainstreamed within our borders through the efforts of a foreign government, namely Saudi Arabia, demands our urgent attention.” The report finds: “Not only does the government of Saudi Arabia not have a right under the First Amendment or any other legal document to spread hate ideology within U.S. borders, it is committing a human rights violation by doing so.”
Such publications that “advocate an ideology of hatred have no place in a nation founded on religious freedom and toleration,” write James Woolsey, chairman of the board of Freedom House, in the foreword to the report.
Among the key findings of the report:
Various Saudi government publications gathered for this study, most of which are in Arabic, assert that it is a religious obligation for Muslims to hate Christians and Jews and warn against imitating, befriending, or helping them in any way, or taking part in their festivities and celebrations;
The documents promote contempt for the United States because it is ruled by legislated civil law rather than by totalitarian Wahhabi-style Islamic law. They condemn democracy as un-Islamic;
The documents stress that when Muslims are in the lands of the unbelievers, they must behave as if on a mission behind enemy lines. Either they are there to acquire new knowledge and make money to be later employed in the jihad against the infidels, or they are there to proselytize the infidels until at least some convert to Islam. Any other reason for lingering among the unbelievers in their lands is illegitimate, and unless a Muslim leaves as quickly as possible, he or she is not a true Muslim and so too must be condemned. For example, a document in the collection for the “Immigrant Muslim” bears the words “Greetings from the Cultural Attache in Washington, D.C.” of the Embassy of Saudi Arabia, and is published by the government of Saudi Arabia. In an authoritative religious voice, it gives detailed instructions on how to “hate” the Christian and Jew: Never greet them first. Never congratulate the infidel on his holiday. Never imitate the infidel. Do not become a naturalized citizen of the United States. Do not wear a graduation gown because this imitates the infidel;
One insidious aspect of the Saudi propaganda examined is its aim to replace traditional and moderate interpretations of Islam with extremist Wahhabism, the officially-established religion of Saudi Arabia. In these documents, other Muslims, especially those who advocate tolerance, are condemned as infidels. The opening fatwa in one Saudi embassy-distributed book, published by the Saudi Air Force, responds to a question about a Muslim preacher in a European mosque who taught that it is not right to condemn Jews and Christians as infidels. The Saudi state cleric’s reply rebukes the Muslim cleric: “He who casts doubts about their infidelity leaves no doubt about his.” Since, under Saudi law, “apostates” from Islam can be sentenced to death, this is an implied death threat against the tolerant Muslim imam, as well as an incitement to vigilante violence;
Sufi and Shiite Muslims are viciously condemned;
For a Muslim who fails to uphold the Saudi Wahhabi sect’s sexual mores (i.e. through homosexual activity or heterosexual activity outside of marriage), the edicts published by the Saudi government’s Ministry of Islamic Affairs, and found in American mosques advise, “it would be lawful for Muslims to spill his blood and to take his money;”
Regarding those who convert out of Islam, the Saudi Ministry of Islamic Affairs explicitly asserts, they “should be killed;”
Saudi textbooks and other publications in the collection, propagate a Nazi-like hatred for Jews, treat the forged Protocols of the Elders of Zion as historical fact, and avow that the Muslim’s duty is to eliminate the state of Israel;
Regarding women, the Saudi publications instruct that they should be veiled, segregated from men and barred from certain employment and roles;
The report states: “While the government of Saudi Arabia claims to be updating’ or reforming its textbooks and study materials within the Kingdom, its publications propagating an ideology of hatred remain plentiful in some prominent American mosques and Islamic centers, and continue to be a principal resource available to students of Islam within the United States.”
The research, translation and principle analysis of the materials for the report were carried out by both Muslims and non-Muslims who wish to remain anonymous for reasons of security. Some 90 percent of the publications are in Arabic; two independent translators reviewed each Arabic document. This project was undertaken after many Muslims requested the Center’s help in exposing Saudi extremism in the hope of freeing their communities from ideological strangulation.
BTW, Christianity is not only consistent with our Constitution, it is the basis of it.
Islam is anachronistic to our Constitution.
Number 2 was SWEET!!
And what do you call it when Eric Holder is releasing the name of the person or persons who made the Mohammad movie? Or that General calling that Preacher down south? Both have freedom of speech and that freedom of speech still goes even if they make fun of muzzies. We either end islam now or more of this sh!t will happen.
Actually, there is. The Supreme Court has held that the government cannot prohibit speech that advocates violence, unless that speech constitutes an incitement to imminent lawless action. Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969).
I agree with you. Islam is anti constitution.
Our Bill of Rights is not a suicide pact.
All members of the islamic faith should be denied resident status and citizenship. Islam is anathema to our traditions and dangerous to our republic.
BS. Tell your neighbor you wish to do him harm. See what happens.
Instead of trying to close mosques, how about cutting off Muslim immigration? We are importing 100,000 Muslims a year. They have no “right” to immigrate here. In fact nobody does. Let’s stop taking in Muslim immigrants.
We need an immigration moratorium anyway.
Cease to recognize Islam as a religion. Problem solved.
I call those unconstitutional activities that have the effect of chilling speech that is protected by the First Amendment. Just like shutting down all mosques would be an unconstitutional activity that restricts religious freedom protected by the First Amendment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.