Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kan. GOP Sec. of State Moving on Obama Birther Nov. Ballot Challenge
Afro ^ | September 14, 2012 | Staff

Posted on 09/14/2012 6:03:33 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Less than two months before Election Day, a group of Kansas Republicans, led by a voter ID law advocate, is moving on a withdrawn challenge which may result in President Obama being removed from the ballot.

Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who has embraced forcing voters to produce ID at the polls, said Sept. 13 that he will preside over a Kansas Board of Objections Sept. 17 meeting where a Manhattan, Kans. veterinary professor Joe Montgomery, questioned Obama’s birthplace and the citizenship of his father.

Kobach said that the board is obligated to do a thorough review of the questions raised by Montgomery about Obama’s birth certificate and not make “a snap decision."

However, Montgomery on Sept 14 withdrew his objections, stating that the Kansas roots of Obama’s mother and grandparents, apparently in his opinion, satisfies the U.S. Constitution’s “natural-born citizen” requirement for the presidency,.

The president's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, and maternal grandparents, Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, were Kansas natives.

The complaint withdrawal came after Kobach made requests to officials in Hawaii, Arizona and Mississippi for copies of the president’s birth records. The birth certificate controversy has been settled in those states and Obama is on those states’ ballots.

In spite of the withdrawal, Kobach said he nevertheless doesn’t believe the matter is dead. "I don't think it's a frivolous objection,” according to Kobach, an unofficial advisor to GOP presidential challenger Mitt Romney’s campaign. "I do think the factual record could be supplemented."

The objections board includes Attorney General Derek Schmidt and Lt. Gov. Jeff Colyer, both Republicans. Current polls indicate that in Kansas, Romney is the current favored candidate at this point in the presidential race.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: arizona; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; hawaii; kansas; mississippi; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last
If even one state does this, the whole house of cards will start to tumble, IMO.
1 posted on 09/14/2012 6:03:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The complaint has been withdrawn by the Kansas citizen who brought it up.


2 posted on 09/14/2012 6:06:42 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Kobach said that the board is obligated to do a thorough review of the questions raised by Montgomery about Obama’s birth certificate and not make “a snap decision."

A "thorough review" would be to get Hawaii to send you a certified 'true and accurate' record along with it amendments, and truthfully vet Obama on the intent and meaning of the natural born citizen clause. Anything else is political game playing.

3 posted on 09/14/2012 6:11:55 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Looks like in this case it is a matter of be careful what you ask for, you just might get it. You just can’t make the space shuttle back up and land on the launch pad.


4 posted on 09/14/2012 6:13:56 PM PDT by mazda77 ("Defeating the Totalitarian Lie" By: Hilmar von Campe. Everybody should read it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
vet Obama on the intent and meaning of the natural born citizen

Did Obama wrote the Constitution?

5 posted on 09/14/2012 6:14:13 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I do think the factual record could be supplemented."

The FACT that it has not be proven, THREE years into his Presidency is an open and shut case for Treason in high places. This country is worse than a Bannana Republic for credibility in Leadership, Law and Justice.

6 posted on 09/14/2012 6:18:10 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

No nick, I’ll rephrase for you. The Founding Fathers of the US Constitution would not consider Obama a natural born citizen.


7 posted on 09/14/2012 6:22:41 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; All
If Obama was born on US soil, he is a Natural Born Citizen.

Period.

There is absolutely no living legal authority, no Judge, no Elected Official, no Elector, no Immigration Attorney, no Member of Congress, and no Governor who disagrees with me on this point.

The Citizenship of the parents ONLY matters if the birth does not take place on American Soil.

This is the law.

PERIOD!

8 posted on 09/14/2012 6:27:34 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
There is absolutely no living legal authority

So? The Founding Fathers agree with us.

PERIOD.

Traitor John Roberts is living and he threw the Founding Fathers under the bus. Traitor Roberts is still WRONG.

9 posted on 09/14/2012 6:32:37 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; Red Badger

There seem to be mixed messages on this. My understanding is that a natural born citizen of the United States must have both a father and a mother who are naturalized citizens, thus making Obama ineligible. But . . . I am not so sure my understanding is in accord with legal reality.

Red Badger and I had a brief back and forth on this some weeks ago. Maybe he could elaborate or comment.


10 posted on 09/14/2012 6:32:53 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (oboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
PERIOD!

BS! Your shouted opinion means squat.

PERIOD!

11 posted on 09/14/2012 6:34:16 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

No, the Founders did NOT agree with you.

It is arrogant for you to claim otherwise.

You do not know what you are talking about.

Natural Born Citizen means Citizen at the moment of Birth, and NOTHING ELSE!

There are only two forms of Citizenship in the United States:

Natural Born

Naturalized

This is the law.


12 posted on 09/14/2012 6:35:09 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
Are you saying Sheriff Arpaio is not a legal authority?
13 posted on 09/14/2012 6:36:31 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (oboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
Nope. It's not.

PERIOD.

Although I'm sure Traitor Roberts will agree with you since he doesn't give a crap about the Constitution.

14 posted on 09/14/2012 6:38:39 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

Herbert Hoover’s mother was born in Canada, although she may have been naturalized by the time of his birth. The previous poster is correct, however, that anyone born on American soil is an American, regardless of parentage. Even a child born outside the United States with an American parent is an American, as was the case with George Romney and John McCain.


15 posted on 09/14/2012 6:39:21 PM PDT by TroutFishingInAmerica ("I remember, with particular amusement, men in three-cornered hats, fishing in the dawn")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MileHi
Land Mark Legal Foundation does not agree with you.

The Heritage Foundation does not agree with you.

Jay Sekulow and the ACLJ do not agree with you.

This STUPID theory is promoted by nut case, tin-foil-hat goobers who do not understand the law or legal opinions.

NOBODY is on your side, nobody at all.

This is a stupid fight and it makes conservatives look stupid.

Obama wants this fight, as he can WIN this fight!

16 posted on 09/14/2012 6:39:25 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew
You are mixing arguments.
Try to keep up.
The good Sheriff is talking about documents and he has many valid points.

I am stating, honestly and factually, that if Obama was born on U.S. Soil, he IS a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!

17 posted on 09/14/2012 6:41:58 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TroutFishingInAmerica

I will qualify your statement to say that I agree, based on the changing rules in force during our history.

The AGE of the parents, and their residence in the years prior to the birth, and years of residence here, does make a difference and the laws have changed several times.

Natural Born Citizen means Citizen at the Moment of Birth.

The laws for NBC on foreign soil can and have been changed, by Congress, several times.


18 posted on 09/14/2012 6:44:56 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
There is absolutely no living legal authority, no Judge, no Elected Official, no Elector, no Immigration Attorney, no Member of Congress, and no Governor who disagrees with me on this point.

No "living" huh? Past US governments that of legal authority do disagree with you.

If Obama was born on US soil, he is a Natural Born Citizen. Period.

The Citizenship of the parents ONLY matters if the birth does not take place on American Soil.

This is the law.

PERIOD!


BS simpleton.

Not according to past US governments who were not into revisionist history, and who understood natural born and to the meaning and usage of the phrase "The Subject of the Jurisdiction Thereof" written in the 14th Amendment:

1874, The House Committee for Foreign Relations on the 14th Amendment.

Nework Times  March  29, 1874  House Foreign Rel citizens pg1, 1874 House Foreign Relations Committee  Bill pertaining to Citizenship under the 14th Amendment.

continued...

New York  Times House Foreign Relations Committee March,  29, 1874, 1874 House Foreign Relations Committee  Bill pertaining to Citizenship under the 14th Amendment. Newyork Times reported 30th March , 1874   Page 2 of 2


You think you can understand what should read above? I have have my doubt.

19 posted on 09/14/2012 6:47:21 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Obongo won’t get Kansas’ electoral votes anyway.


20 posted on 09/14/2012 6:48:39 PM PDT by Blogatron (Fire President Gilligan!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson