Skip to comments.US drops to 18th most economically free country
Posted on 09/19/2012 6:47:29 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache
At its pinnacle in 2000, the United States ranked second in the world for economic freedom. In the latest report on world economic freedom from the Fraser Institute, the U.S. has now dropped all the way down to 18th, falling behind countries like Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Estonia, Taiwan and Qatar.
The decline did not happen overnight. This entire decade weve been sliding towards this 18th ranking, report author Joshua Hall explained to The Daily Caller News Foundation.
By 2005, the United States had already dropped to eighth in economic freedom. In 2009, the U.S. fell behind welfare state countries like Denmark, Finland and Canada.
When people think of Canada, they think of socialized medicine, but in many facets of life, Canada is a lot more economically free than the United States, said Hall.
The annual report uses 42 different variables that can be categorized into five distinct categories: size of government, legal system and property rights, sound money, freedom of trade internationally and regulation.
The growth of government and less secure property rights have the most to do with the United States drop.
I think we think of the underlying causes of our decline in legal system and property rights, the Supreme Courts Kelo decision [over eminent domain], the war on terror, and things related to the rule of law, things like TARP and the bail outs, have all contributed to the decline of scores in areas one and two, Hall explained. Ads by Google
In 2005, [transfers and subsidies were] 12.6 percent of GDP. Today its 16.3 percent Thats the outcome of policy decisions.
Over the past 12 years, not only has the United States fared worse in economic freedom, but other countries have made gains.
If you go back to 2000, we were sliding early on in the decade, Hall elaborated. We were kind of bunched around a bunch of other countries and they increased a little bit. So countries like Canada, for example, have actually gotten a little better, and weve fallen behind that was enough for a bunch of countries to jump past us.
There is evidence that economic freedom improves quality of life.
Theres a strong relationship thats been borne up by dozens of academic studies showing a positive relationship between higher economic freedom and higher economic growth, Hall explained. And thats true whether you are looking at the nation as a whole, only looking at the poorest members of society.
People care about economic freedom because it contributes to things that benefit us all, like higher living standards, he added.
While countries like Qatar and Taiwan do not yet experience U.S. standards of living, the Fraser Institutes report suggests they are on the right track to eventually meet or exceed our standards of living.
They have higher economic freedom, but you need many many years of economic freedom, Hall said. Our research would suggest that they are going to grow faster and thats going to be the route at which they catch up to our standard of living is through the higher growth that comes with higher economic freedom.
At a time when the presidential candidates debate the future of entitlement programs and the federal government runs $1 trillion annual deficits, this new ranking may put things in a more global perspective.
This not a part of the current political debate, Hall said. We need people to understand our long term living standards depend upon getting back to that economic freedom that we enjoyed just a decade ago.
“The decline did not happen overnight.”
This is the kind of statement that liberals like to make in order to obfuscate the fact that they are to blame.
—a retail business needs to be stocked, and usually needs a dedicated storefront, unless it's on line or mail-order.
—a service business could require some sort of vehicle separate from the business owner's everyday grocery-getter to carry business-related equipment .
But these decisions should be up to the business owner, who should stand or fall on the results of these and other decisions adding to or detracting from profitability.
The legal steps that must be taken before you can even get the (real or figurative) doors open in this country I frankly find appalling. If I could carry indoor plumbing and HVAC with me, I'd rather live in the early 19th century.
I've made 1800 phone calls from home to New Hampshire in the last seven days using the system set up by the campaign. Even 100 calls will make a difference. Who will join me?
Huh? Welfare state?
What are the Canadian equivalents of WIC, EBT, food stamps? There aren't any. And the federally run school breakfast, lunch and dinner program? Nope, no such animal, Canada prefers the parents look after their children's meals. What a novel concept!
I love it when a writer in a country that pays people for 99 weeks NOT TO WORK (44 weeks in Canada) calls Canada a "welfare state". Ms. Fores, please check your premises, sources, conclusions before you approach your computer again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.