They are illegal entrants, and they are visitors ~ not immigrants at all since you need an immigration visa to be an immigrant.
I prefer to call them "illegal tourists who are broke" ~ else they'd go home like the other visitors do when their time is up.
Time to take back the language. Don't let Mexicans and Russians define 'immigrant'
Simple. They are criminals. They are breaking the law by illegally entering this country.
If you are an alien living in the country illegally, YOU’RE AN ILLEGAL ALIEN. What are your questions, Jose? The first thing illegal aliens do when they sneak across the border into America is break the Fluken law!
“He says the word is inaccurate, improper and demeaning.”
And I say he lies, lies, and lies.
Go ahead make illegal immigration easy, then the illegal Hispanics will be subsumed by illegal Asians.
Either you are here legally or you are here illegally.
End of story.
You don’t ban “illegal”
Those who agree with Mr. Vargas say illegal should be banned because it suggests that illegal immigrants are criminals, which often isnt true. No human being is illegal, they say.
Is it illegal for me to sneak into a sporting event without paying?
What is even more disturbing is that the NY Times obbudswoman has “been looking into it” and will “weigh in soon”.
But then again, these liberals have successfully changed the meaning of the word “marriage” after about 6000 years of a universally understood definition of marriage.
We are entering a dark age, and if history is a precedent, western civilization is over and the muslims will once again rule the world for centuries. And they won’t be nice about it.
The term “wetback” works for me.
Marxists destroy language to control the allowed thoughts. Those who control the meaning of words (and allowed associations) control concepts. (especially the children-—turn off your TV! and get them OUT of public schools).
Erase ‘illegal’-—and they are legal in the eyes of the masses.
That is why they equate God’s rainbow with homosexuals....to mock the Bible in the eyes of children. Destroys the impact and ideas of the Bible.
They put words together “homosexual marriage”-—an idea never ever expressed prior to the 80’s, because it is such a stupid, impossible, non-rational concept.
Why?-—To normalize the idea, no matter how absurd, if it is in the dialogue—it becomes a fact. The concept-—especially in the eyes of the young...who will soon be the voters and politicians will not only normalize Vice , but actually take “Pride” in Vice—because they were brainwashed into it.
That will collapsed Civil Society to promote Vice because it destroys Justice-—doesn’t matter. Irrationality (emotions) rules in the masses will be “Rights”. Right Reason and the Laws of Nature are no longer the Supreme Law of the Land. No absolutes-—just arbitrary law not based in logic destroyed Rome. (Cicero).
Good becomes Evil.....Words —when you destroy their meaning—you limit the concepts allowed. Marriage-—now people have to put an adjective before it-—never happened when we were a Christian Constitutional Republic. Now words have no meaning——so there can be no debate—no understanding-—especially by the children.
Nothing makes sense. Irrational thinkers will believe anything and allow themselves to become slaves and will sell their souls to Satan.
Illegals have far more rights than law-abiding US citizens. I’d sure like to know what laws I can break that, not only will I not be punished for breaking, but will be rewarded for breaking.
Here’s a good alternative. If someone is a legal US citizen, and they or their parents were from Mexico, we should call them “Americans”. If they are not legal US citizens, they should be called “Mexicans”, assuming they are Mexican citizens, or “Guatemalans”, etc.
By doing this, it clarifies things. These people are not US citizens, and they do not have legal papers to visit or have an extended stay in the United States.
As such, the US should provide them nothing other than deportation, any more than we should give money to their countrymen in their country. If they have taken services and goods from us they are not entitled to, as foreigners, we can choose to either bill them for the costs, or deport them and take the loss.
In either case, the most they should be afforded is the courtesy that we would afford any foreigner visiting the US who has broken our laws.
Are they “illegal aliens”? Technically, yes. But they are “citizens of Mexico”, and as such, need repatriation.
Fine Jose. I’ll stick with “illegal democrats” then. That eliminates the issue with the word, eh?