Skip to comments.Fever Dreams From My Real Father
Posted on 10/01/2012 1:54:05 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
click here to read article
“Dreams form my real father” is having an impact.
Attacking Gilbert proves it.
The evidence he has uncovered is false because he’s... he’s.... he’s a nut!?
I believe the evidence stands on it’s own merits. Frank Davis took naked pictures of Stanley Ann Dunham in December of 1960, shortly after she became pregnant.
Didn’t see a rebuttal to those facts anywhere in your excerpt. What’s a matter? Can’t do anything other than ad hominem the messenger? So he’s a nut, but the facts he has uncovered speak for themselves. Let’s talk about the actual evidence, shall we?
He must be hitting a nerve. Not a word about the evidence. All of it is how kooky and untrustworthy Gilbert is. And how does one do a search for a specific stock photo one thinks has been used to photoshop a fake building?
Given the effort spent researching this guy and his background, his work product must really be giving them fits.
Forthcoming...it's a series.
Leave it to Democrat LorenC to get it bassackwards. I would think the proof ought to come before the smear. And why are you trafficking with Democrats?
Other than being anti-birther, what proof do you have of his political leanings that are liberal/Democrat?
This is her in 1960:
This is not her:
At least not her in 1960.
This is her in 1972:
Unless she had her jaw broken and reset twice, it ain't her.
Gilbert also made movies claiming Bob Dylan was still alive, so he must be a big fake.
Nothing new here (except the picture of an office). Already discussed last August on FR.
Are we allowed to post articles from ex-FReepers that were ZOTTED?
Let me know if he got anything wrong in what I posted.
Are you over on Fogbow with him?
Lets talk about the actual evidence, shall we?
They don’t like to do that...ever. Wonder why?
You’re not suggesting there aren’t a lot of libertarian-leaning FR members, are you?
Well, first of all he is a weird looking loon that has an unhealthy obsession with this issue that can only be regarded as the act of a sane man *IF* he is actually working FOR the Obama Administration or supporting his policies in General. (Ideologically Liberal)
He's an attorney. As a group they are major contributors to the Democrat party. Throw a rock into a group of attorneys and the odds are you have hit a Democrat. He claims to have voted for Bob Barr, so that means he didn't vote for McCain. A Vote for anyone else was a vote for Obama. (And that's *IF* he's telling the truth)
His Church/School appears to be affiliated with the Stone-Campbell Restoration Movement and the International Churches of Christ, which if I recall properly is a pretty Liberal group.
My recollection is that he was banned here at Free Republic. I would count that as a strike against him. I suppose I could dig around in his old postings here on Free Republic for a better analysis, but given that his Cohorts are people like Doctor Conspiracy, I would say that's the direction he leans.
He claims to be a libertarian, but his actions seem to be geared toward helping the Democrats.
three faces of the same model
The model and Stanley Ann Dunham have different chins and noses
and nothing lines up because it simply isn't the same girl.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.