Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

And you are planning to return and show me that both girls had slightly prominent front teeth (one a little more prominent than the other)and a small incisor (one a little smaller than the other) on the same side, right? You plan to use as proof the Model and Stanley Ann Dunham are the same girl because of a very slight similarity in their teeth - and ignore the fact that NOTHING ELSE in their facial features lines up - not the eyes, not the nose, not the chin, not the ears...

Mind you, Loren C (banned) wouldn't have bothered to write the posted article if the Joel Gilbert story wasn't damaging his hero, so I'm happy to let the misidentification stand. Lord knows the truth hasn't been much use so far, not while you're hanging onto the lie by the skin of your teeth...and Gilbert's film is the new standard.

31 posted on 10/01/2012 6:01:55 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Nerks
Why do people keep picking the wrong photos? When viewed from the angle you chose, the crooked tooth is not prominent. Try this picture.

|

That upper left first incisor sticks out prominently from this angle. Bear in mind the nude picture is three years older than the younger (and clearer) picture of Stanley Ann. That there is something amiss on her top left incisors is unmistakable in both pictures.

32 posted on 10/01/2012 8:26:40 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Nerks
SAD nose asymmetrical; Model nose nothing similar. QED not one but two persons.
33 posted on 10/01/2012 8:32:12 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Fakistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson