D’Souza chose to pursue certain targeted ‘facts’ about Obama that support his anti-colonialism thesis. The birth narrative, SS#, etc. don’t have a thing to do with that.
Had D’Souza gone scattershot with the birth story, SS#, etc. it would have served only to make a mush of his theory. Why would he clutter his story with extraneous theories and facts?
My point is that he reacts like the rest of the conservative media. He starts out with a provable lie then gets mad when shown a fact. His theory is based on that lie. Cashill explains in the article.
Obama hates America and whites for sure. He was raised by communists, marxists, racists, and perverts.
DSouza has some useful and valuable insights but there is much more to the story and if he can't acknowledge basic facts he's got a nerve snapping at anyone.