Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokeyblue

D’Souza chose to pursue certain targeted ‘facts’ about Obama that support his anti-colonialism thesis. The birth narrative, SS#, etc. don’t have a thing to do with that.

Had D’Souza gone scattershot with the birth story, SS#, etc. it would have served only to make a mush of his theory. Why would he clutter his story with extraneous theories and facts?


18 posted on 10/02/2012 12:58:46 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA
"When Boyles called Obama's claim of being abandoned by his father at age two "a provable lie," D'Souza snapped back, "That is not a provable lie." He then volunteered the novel theory that Ann moved back to Hawaii after the first quarter at the University of Washington in fall 1961 and quite possibly saw Obama Sr. off to Harvard in June 1962."

My point is that he reacts like the rest of the conservative media. He starts out with a provable lie then gets mad when shown a fact. His theory is based on that lie. Cashill explains in the article.

Obama hates America and whites for sure. He was raised by communists, marxists, racists, and perverts.

D’Souza has some useful and valuable insights but there is much more to the story and if he can't acknowledge basic facts he's got a nerve snapping at anyone.

20 posted on 10/02/2012 4:38:31 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson