Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

The truth is the truth...

Thanks, Loren.

1 posted on 10/03/2012 7:13:02 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Tex-Con-Man
"I personally reviewed copies of Exotique #14, Battling Babes and Secret Pleasures, and they included NO pictures of the mystery model. "

Got to appreciate taking one for the team!!!

2 posted on 10/03/2012 7:17:16 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tex-Con-Man
As the country sinks into bankruptcy and socialism, I propose the following:

It IS zero's mother - Result: who cares.

It IS NOT zero's mother - Result: who cares.

It IS NOT someone that looks like zero's mother - Result: who cares.

It is entirely Photo-shopped: - Result: who cares.

I really don't give a hoot about where zero was born, who his father is/was, or what his mother did 50 years ago. My concern is about what he is doing TODAY - and that is killing the country that was and is the last best hope for humanity.

3 posted on 10/03/2012 7:24:39 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tex-Con-Man
The rest of the story...

Fever Dreams From My Real Father #3: Factual Failings, #2: "Anne" vs. Ann

Fever Dreams From My Real Father - #5: Joel Gilbert's Phantom Evidence & #4: Family Portraits

Fever Dreams From My Real Father #6: The Omniscient Joel Gilbert

Fever Dreams From My Real Father (#7)

4 posted on 10/03/2012 7:32:04 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tex-Con-Man
Most people didn't take the photo claim very seriously

Since she isn't running for President, I didn't. However, I appreciate the investigative work here. Unfortunately, by including the now bogus pics, it invalidates the whole video for most recipients.

8 posted on 10/03/2012 8:25:23 AM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Who cares about the truth 50 years ago, esp. from a story that no one has ever heard of?

There is an anti-colonialist Marxist in the WH who is doing everything in and outside the power of his office to permanently cripple America... and THAT is the truth.


9 posted on 10/03/2012 8:25:36 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void; LucyT; Tex-Con-Man
Eligibility ping...

Blogger claims naked “Ann” pics can't be Stanley Ann Dunham because the pics were published in 1958 when Stanley Ann was 16 (he repeatedly says 15 even while stating she was born in 1942) and in WA in HS.

In any case, even if Ann had posed in a naked group photo shoot on a date when she would already have been pregnant didn't mean the photographer did the deed. Only forensic discovery could prove that (at this point, DNA). That ain't happening. I have always maintained that Barry looking so close to his claimed half brother, David, and notable resemblance to his other half-brothers, Mark and George, makes it likely that BHO Sr. is his bio-dad.

Not having Davis as the dad would put NBC eligibility back in play due to having a non-US citizen dad, depending on how SCOTUS would rule, should a case ever get there.

10 posted on 10/03/2012 10:02:09 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tex-Con-Man
This is about the only one of his postings that i've seen so far that has any useful information in it. It had already been pointed out by others that the Magazine issues he's cited were the wrong years to be Ann, and were merely used as props.

If what Loren says about seeing the girl in those magazines published before 1960 is true, then it effectively rules out the possibility that any of those pictures are of Stanley Ann. (The Gilbert 7)

Where his theory has a weak spot is in proving that the First three pictures are of the same woman as are the pictures which Gilbert subsequently discovered. I have never examined the Gilbert pictures closely, I merely accepted Gilbert's contention that they were of the same woman, and a casual glance looks close enough to accept his claim in the absence of any reason to look further. When they were first discovered, I contacted his company asking for the best image files of them that he had available, and the response I got back was "Buy the movie", which put me off.

Many people merely accepted Gilbert's word that these pictures were of the same woman as the original three, based on the fact that they were taken in the same setting as the original three. Now that Loren has pointed out another picture of an obviously different woman taken in the same setting, it makes it very clear that this setting was likely used to take quite a lot of nude pictures of quite a lot of nude women, and quite likely over a several year period.

Now if Loren has found any of the first three pictures in one of those magazines published prior to 1960, he has proven his case, yet I don't see him claiming that. He merely implies that since the Gilbert pictures must have been taken in 1958 or so, then so must have the original three. This has not been established as a fact. Does LorenC realize that he is implying something is true rather than establishing concrete proof? If he has done this consciously, then it is an attempt to mislead, the very complaint he has been making against Gilbert.

I personally regard Gilbert and LorenC as not being much different in this regard, merely fighting on opposite sides. LorenC has proven that Gilbert is is a bit of a nut, (Which anyone could see from just looking at his "Stanly worked for the CIA theory") and that he is intentionally deceiving people about the pictures he's found, and therefore he cannot be trusted on his other statements without some sort of proof backing him up.

I would be interested to see if Gilbert actually has the proof he claims. (The Photographs he took of the floor and the room.) If he does, he still cannot win back his credibility, but he might still salvage his theory.

This should have been the first article posted.

11 posted on 10/03/2012 10:21:38 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tex-Con-Man
I think the women is too classy to be Obama’s mother.
15 posted on 10/06/2012 9:18:55 PM PDT by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson