Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Drudge On To Something? Gloria Allred Refuses To Comment On 'October Surprise'
RadarOnline ^ | 10-19-12 | Jen Heger

Posted on 10/19/2012 7:12:29 AM PDT by jmstein7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: jmstein7

I would just burn about 10 million copies of “Dreams From My Real Father” and hand them out. Everyone needs to see this film.


41 posted on 10/19/2012 7:44:44 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Here come the phony feminists again trying to overtake real women who can stand on their own two feet.


42 posted on 10/19/2012 7:45:24 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

THIS JUST IN!!: Gloria Allred has legally changed her name to Gloria Allblue, to show her support for the president and all things Liberal.


43 posted on 10/19/2012 7:45:32 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andrei Bulba

2012-04-18


44 posted on 10/19/2012 7:45:50 AM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wiser now

I’m not so sure. Mitt is being attacked for his “binders of women” comment, even by obama. Why? That was a nothing mistake by Romney. Is it to setup the focus on women, his “disregard” of women, prior to whatever Allred may allege? Their focus on the “binders” faux-pas sounds like a setup....(or they are just completely out of things to attack Romney on).


45 posted on 10/19/2012 7:48:48 AM PDT by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Many responses to this post. I would be amazed if Romney was not ready for crap like this.


46 posted on 10/19/2012 7:52:38 AM PDT by pabianice (washington, dc ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

I think the later.


47 posted on 10/19/2012 7:54:35 AM PDT by Wiser now (Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

The only possible way to silence someone with a scandal, is if they previously signed an agreement to remain silent.

The problem with that is, even IF Romney knows who the person is in advance, Romney will just call attention to the whole thing and Gloria can run around about how Romney is so scared he tried to keep her quiet.

Also, Gloria got around this confidentiality business against Cain, by keeping the identity of the person secret, and calling on Cain to release them from their confidentiality agreement. This was highly effective and you are not going to keep the national media off a Romney scandal by waiving legal action.

I am sure they are considering using Allred on this, it’s what they do and more specifically it’s what Axelrod does. This close to the election, the person can be the biggest bimbo, scum, liar in the world and Romney won’t have time to prove that and shut teh scandal down.

If Rasmussen has the election right, it could make a big difference. If Gallup has it right, not so much.

I do believe the RNC knows about this already. Freepers called them yesterday and Matt Drudge’s tweets must go to millions of people?


48 posted on 10/19/2012 7:55:27 AM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

I think you are correct about the reason for the “binder” comments.


49 posted on 10/19/2012 7:59:45 AM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Remember when the story broke about W's old DWI..just before the election..it was very discouraging...I remember all he threads here on FR.

The problem is, Allred dumps it..even if it's not remotely credible..the MSM joyfully picks it up..the retractions come AFTER election day.

However, I suspect that Romney is ready for it..

50 posted on 10/19/2012 8:01:18 AM PDT by ken5050 (Another reason to vote for Mitt: The Mormon Tabernacle Choir will perform at the WH Christmas party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Yours is an interesting point, though I think unintentional. Are the Dems about to broach the topic that we are about to elect a full fledged religious leader as POTUS. I am not familiar enough with the workings of the LDS, but in Catholic and High Church Protestant structures the term “bishop” indicates a figure of considerable authority within the Church, making liturgical, clerical, and doctrinal decisions. Would electing Romney be akin to electing Timothy Cardinal Dolan or Episcopal Bishop John Shelby Spong? To take that route would certainly be a disrupting factor in the last two weeks.


51 posted on 10/19/2012 8:03:32 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Looks a lot more natural than when he is kissing Michele. Obama has a lot of skeletons in his closet; if Alred starts up it might give our side an opening to get these out front and center.

52 posted on 10/19/2012 8:03:37 AM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Andrei Bulba

It could be this. Old news in MA.

http://www.alternet.org/election-2012/mitt-romneys-heartless-advice-woman-whose-pregnancy-might-have-killed-her?page=0%2C0


53 posted on 10/19/2012 8:04:01 AM PDT by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: evets
Doubt this will be brought out, because he would be much more popular in the minds of Catholic's. Then again, the Liberals are pushing the women's issue's so hard this week that this would be the "icing on the cake".

I just want to get through this election with Obama thrown out onto his ear.

Pray for our country.

54 posted on 10/19/2012 8:14:13 AM PDT by mia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Good summary of why there are questions. Both Hillary and Obama should be answering those questions.


55 posted on 10/19/2012 8:16:06 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I agree with all the above being possibly correct. I read earlier on that Stevens supposedly was somehow involved in the coordination of Gaddafi's assassination and I think he was either sacrificed for that reason or somehow this was the October Surprise diversion that went wrong or perhaps both. I do believe that the security was purposelessly reigned back for the events to unfold flawlessly but the Seals created a problem. Rumored that Stevens was sodomized with a stiletto knife similar to Gaddafi while still alive.

How ironic that he would be tortured the same way?

56 posted on 10/19/2012 8:17:31 AM PDT by classified
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

One factual question I have: How many people were around the embassy when it was attacked? There wasn’t a protest, so how many people were there? Realistically speaking, from a special ops and military standpoint, what would have been the options by the time the military people got the live feed? What were the military people urging Obama to approve, that he didn’t approve and went to bed instead?


57 posted on 10/19/2012 8:19:36 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: evets

In the article, the woman refers to her unborn baby as “that eight-week possibility in my uterus.”

How lovely. /s


58 posted on 10/19/2012 8:25:08 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Don't be afraid to see what you see. (Ronald Reagan))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

After the stuff that was pulled on Bush, if the voters who are too stupid to recognize this crap are enough to turn the election, then this country is one short gasp away from death anyway.

My hope is that the shine is off the rose, so that people can see through Obama’s hype and tripe. I was encouraged by somebody posting about their know-nothing friend who heard Obama try to claim that he had called the Benghazi attack a terrorist attack right away, but knew all the news they had heard was blaming it on that video. They believed their own ears rather than what the man behind the curtain is now trying to tell them. And if the uninformed people can see the blatant contortions by Obama, those contortions are less likely to be effective, even with the most dangerous/vulnerable segment of the public.


59 posted on 10/19/2012 8:28:34 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

I think that there was something on Drudge yesterday.

Has anyone considered that this news may come from Obama’s opposition? Perhaps about his possible gay relationships.


60 posted on 10/19/2012 8:30:21 AM PDT by BobNative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson