Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Easiest Way to Fire a Teacher - Not paying union dues can lead to quick dismissal
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 1018/2012 | Audrey Spalding

Posted on 10/22/2012 6:11:55 AM PDT by MichCapCon

On Feb. 21, 2012, Kalamazoo Public Schools fired a teacher — not for poor performance or for inappropriate conduct — but because she didn't pay her union dues.

According to court documents, Lori Erk went on medical leave in May 2011. Though the district initially approved the leave, it was subsequently unapproved, meaning that Erk had no source of income after June 2011. (Note: Use "Search Form" on MDE website to search for Erk.)

Though Erk was not receiving income from KPS that year, the Kalamazoo Education Association tried to collect $411.25 in dues from her for the 2011-12 school year.

After several written requests, the KEA made its final request in January 2012, when KEA President Millie Lambert sent Erk an email requesting that she pay the $411.25. Erk responded:

I HAVE NO INCOME!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why are you coming after me??? I have always supported KEA and you personally!! I had so much respect for you.

Five weeks later, Erk was terminated.

All of KPS' and the KEA's actions were perfectly legal. Though teachers unions have fought to keep heavy protections for teachers in Michigan's Teacher Tenure Act, many school districts have collective bargaining agreements that result in quick dismissal of teachers who do not pay union dues or fees.

The KPS collective bargaining agreement, for example, states that teachers who do not want to be a member of the KEA are required to pay the union a "fee" that is the same amount as the its dues.

Teachers who do not pay that fee, the agreement states, "...shall be dismissed from their employment by the District..."

Other school districts have similar provisions. Hale Area Schools’ agreement with the Hale Federation of Teachers states that a teacher who does not pay union dues or an equivalent fee to the union within 30 days of being hired can be fired within a week.

Compare these quick terminations to the generous protections and processes provided to teachers, even those who are found to be intoxicated while working.

No serious argument can be made that the practice of firing teachers who do not give money to the union helps students learn. The only possible reason for these terminations (and the threat of termination) is to preserve the power of a single union within the district. Indeed, in the Hale contract, the firing of teachers who do not pay union dues is stipulated under a section labeled “Union Security.”

In Missouri, some districts allow teachers to choose between two unions. Teachers can choose the Missouri Education Association, or the Missouri State Teachers' Association, which is opposed to union members being forced to pay dues to a national union. Some teachers have testified that they choose MSTA because it does not take positions on social issues.

The teachers in the Kalamazoo and Hale school districts have no such option. It is deplorable that some Michigan school districts provide no choice to teachers by agreeing to contracts that require teachers to pay money to the union as a condition of employment. It is worse still that public school districts act as the union’s enforcer when teachers step out of line.


TOPICS: Education
KEYWORDS: schools; unions

1 posted on 10/22/2012 6:12:00 AM PDT by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon
Two points that jump out:

1. If her medical leave was originally approved, then disapproved, why didn't the union file a grievance on her behalf? Isn't the first job of the union to protect a member's rights? /NOT!!

2. It often takes YEARS to fire a teacher accused of bad actions..hearings after hearings, appeals after appeals..yet they can axe this lady in a few weeks..

2 posted on 10/22/2012 6:57:21 AM PDT by ken5050 (Another reason to vote for Mitt: The Mormon Tabernacle Choir will perform at the WH Christmas party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Springman; Sioux-san; 70th Division; JPG; PGalt; DuncanWaring; taildragger; epluribus_2; tatown; ...
Making the payment of dues optional would cripple the unions.

If anyone wants to be added to the Michigan Cap Con ping list, let me know.
3 posted on 10/22/2012 7:15:56 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Yep. The other thing that jumped out at me was that most unions allow for withdrawals. I’m still a member of IAM although I’ve held a “temporary” withdrawal since the early 90’s.

She didn’t do a very good job of defending her own rights and now she wants a mulligan.


4 posted on 10/22/2012 7:30:18 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson