Honestly, I think the real winner of tonight’s debate was Ayman al-Zawahiri.
They’re both clueless about the nature of the Syrian opposition. Romney’s proposals for the follow-on to the Arab Spring are pure vaporware, and of course Obama presided over that disaster, which both of them kept trying to make out to be a victory for democracy. Obama’s assertion that al Qaeda is weaker than when he took office is based on an erroneous perception of what al Qaeda is — in terms of its own declared program, al Qaeda is winning.
posted on 10/22/2012 7:53:24 PM PDT
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
Theyre both clueless about the nature of the Syrian opposition.
All I know is that whenever a video of an opposition attack pops up, I hear cries of "Allah Akbar" in the background. It tells me that they are jihadis and will turn on us as soon as they finish killing each other.
posted on 10/22/2012 8:04:02 PM PDT
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
I wonder how Mitt could do other than point out some of the failures - very difficult to developp an argument when you have had no connections whatever to the subject.
posted on 10/23/2012 4:16:03 AM PDT
(Allies no longer trust us. Enemies no longer fear us.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson