Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Petraeus's 'Sex Under The Desk' Mistress Pictured Just A Few Seats From His Wife As Colleague...
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | November 10, 2012

Posted on 11/11/2012 10:06:22 AM PST by Steelfish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-80 last
To: dfwgator

That’s an interesting take. I’ve always wondered why Petraeus was offerred the CIA position, given the animosity between him and Obama.


51 posted on 11/11/2012 11:24:48 AM PST by ContraryMary (Obama -- Inept and Out of His Depth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I had to find that on Amazon to make sure it wasn't satire. I did and it is real.

Your point about the irony is dead on.

52 posted on 11/11/2012 11:26:05 AM PST by freedumb2003 (We can’t just leave it (food choice) up to the parents. -- moochele obozo 2/12/2012 (cnsnews))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

If she were to put her sights on Moi.. We’re going to need a bigger desk.. :)


53 posted on 11/11/2012 11:41:39 AM PST by carlo3b (Less Government, more Fiber..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bandleader

I was born in 1939. I remember farming with horses. After a hitch in the Army Security Agency I was an IBM repairman (”Customer Engineer”) in Lower Manhattan in NYC. I remember when a man’s word was his bond. How do you think I feel?


54 posted on 11/11/2012 11:50:55 AM PST by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: TiaS

Yep. This whole thing is getting fishier by the day.


55 posted on 11/11/2012 11:52:57 AM PST by RoosterRedux (Obama: "If you've got a business -- you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: UKrepublican
"I can certainly say I’ve lost all respect for him, although he certainly has a had a career that is almost full of success."

Aren't Obama's 'Rules of Engagement' the same as the Petraeus M.O.?

Win the hearts & minds of the muslim terroritst so they won't kill us? No shooting first or doing anything to upset them!! Just go & pretend to fight the war with your hands tied behind your back!!!

Our troops are dying because of ROE & how can that be regarded as great leadership?

56 posted on 11/11/2012 11:53:07 AM PST by LADY J (You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have. - Author Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

My hunch is Mike Morell was calling the shots. Petraeus could not bring in his own advisers but was surrounded by WH insiders. That should have been Peaches’ first clue.


57 posted on 11/11/2012 11:54:40 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

A 21st century Mata Hari.

She deserves the same end.


58 posted on 11/11/2012 11:54:40 AM PST by miserare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twister881

That is who I was thinking of, too...Lisa Nowak.

But Broadwell didn’t wear diapers while threatening her rival.


59 posted on 11/11/2012 12:00:17 PM PST by miserare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph

He looks like a dope!


60 posted on 11/11/2012 12:02:08 PM PST by miserare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: miserare

But Broadwell didn’t wear diapers while threatening her rival.


We don’t know that.


61 posted on 11/11/2012 12:02:52 PM PST by OwenKellogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

There is no more “KGB.” They’re now the “FSA.”


62 posted on 11/11/2012 12:04:02 PM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
Holly is a DEMOCRAT that works for Obama.....

The 'General' had wandering eyes for a reason, ehheheheh. She bees low on the totmem pole.

63 posted on 11/11/2012 12:19:19 PM PST by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
Holly is a DEMOCRAT that works for Obama.....

The 'General' had wandering eyes for a reason, ehheheheh. She bees low on the totem pole.

64 posted on 11/11/2012 12:19:33 PM PST by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

Have you read “KGB: Death and Rebirth”?


65 posted on 11/11/2012 12:23:24 PM PST by Jyotishi (Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

I doubt it. Unless she is a man!


66 posted on 11/11/2012 12:28:40 PM PST by US_MilitaryRules (Unnngh! To many PDS people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

You know, this is a very accomplished woman.I saw a list
of her CV type info yesterday. But she’s all over the
front page of the New York Times only for spreading her
legs, and its what she’ll be remembered for a la lewinsky.

All parties involved seem like big gov’t types.To hell with them anyway. No sympathy,none.


67 posted on 11/11/2012 12:39:49 PM PST by americas.best.days... ( I think we can now say that they are behind us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

she’s not even pretty! bad skin acne on her chin, mole on her forehead and mannish features. I mean seriously! if your going to throw your career and family away at least find someone hot!


68 posted on 11/11/2012 12:45:46 PM PST by annelizly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: miserare
He looks like a dope!

He is a dope if he didn't divorce her.

69 posted on 11/11/2012 12:51:53 PM PST by SIDENET ("If that's your best, your best won't do." -Dee Snider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Jyotishi

A spy agency works best if people are convinced that it doesn’t exist.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Yep and the CIA didn’t have its own Air Force and Navy etc in Nam.

For years the National Security Agency (NSA) was referred to as

NO SUCH AGENCY

Oh, the games we play....<:


70 posted on 11/11/2012 12:54:48 PM PST by xrmusn (6/98 "Hope in one hand and $hiite in the other and see which fills up first".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Would you put me on your ping list please?


71 posted on 11/11/2012 12:55:16 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: miserare

It does have pet-rabbit-boiling Fatal Attraction qualities, though. Hack P4’s Gmail account, find out with whom he is corresponding, threaten a perceived rival to “back off.” Broadwell does have Runaway Bride / Charles Manson crazy eyes.


72 posted on 11/11/2012 12:59:46 PM PST by twister881
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: LADY J; UKrepublican
Our troops are dying because of ROE & how can that be regarded as great leadership?

Petraeus is not a big fan of the 1st Amendment either.

Petraeus condemns Fla. church's plan to burn Korans Sept. 7, 2010

KABUL - Gen. David H. Petraeus on Tuesday denounced plans by a Florida church to burn copies of the Koran this weekend, saying the demonstration could "endanger troops" and damage the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan.

"It is precisely the kind of action the Taliban uses and could cause significant problems," Petraeus, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, said in a statement. "Not just here, but everywhere in the world we are engaged with the Islamic community."


73 posted on 11/11/2012 1:28:16 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

I think most of us on the Benghazi ping list don’t feel you are obligated to ping hundreds of Petraeus sex posts...because there will be that many in the next several weeks -— especially with articles when no pertinent information is gained (timeline, who knew what when, for instance) or when the article isn’t directly involved with Benghazi.

I suspect we are going to be fed Petraeus sex posts into January. In fact, while many pundits have been saying this is going to put Benghazi on the front burner, I am beginning to think it will be designed to do just the opposite-— spoon-feed us sex tidbits until we stop watching news altogether because the holidays are coming. Apparently, the electorate is that predictable.


74 posted on 11/11/2012 1:36:06 PM PST by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Petraeus is not a big fan of the 1st Amendment either.

_____________________

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Taken literally, there's nothing in there about the inalienable right to burn stuff.

By contrast, the right to "denounce" or criticize things -- which is what he was doing -- is in there.

If saying you don't think somebody should do something is violating their 1st Amendment rights, then there are no 1st Amendment rights.

75 posted on 11/11/2012 1:45:56 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: x
The 1st Amendment doesn't have to spell out every single possible mode of expression. That idea is stupid. And Petraeus is stupid to blame the pastor and condemn him when his buddy Karzai is the one who purposely spread the news to every raghead nutcase in Afghanistan.

From the WSJ:

"Most Afghans learned about the Quran burning in Florida only when Mr. Karzai on March 24 (4 days after!) condemned the act as "a crime against the religion and the entire Muslim nation," called on the U.S. and the U.N. to bring the perpetrators to justice and demanded "a satisfactory response to the resentment and anger of over 1.5 billion Muslims around the world."

General Petraeus certainly won Karzai's heart and mind. /s

76 posted on 11/11/2012 1:53:20 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

According to at least three skanks on LS, Petraeus’ wife deserves it. It seems Holly just doesn’t dress well enough for a general’s wife. Is there anyone out there who will volunteer to be a seamstress for poor Holly. It seems her clothes don’t fit property according to cks, dsl and last but not least the queen of all military wives, nursery rhyme poet and Duke Lacrosse matron, Joan Foster.


77 posted on 12/22/2012 6:39:19 PM PST by Memphis Blues (Never Underestimate the Power of Ignorance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Hot legs. All that running really pays off....


78 posted on 12/22/2012 6:43:27 PM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: annelizly

The chassis is robust and filled with stamina....


79 posted on 12/22/2012 6:45:37 PM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Memphis Blues

As my wife pointed out, it would be difficult to find a woman making > 200 grand and in this high of a power position looking and dressing that poorly.


80 posted on 12/22/2012 6:47:54 PM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson