Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Prove Voting Machine Fraud
PolitiJim.com ^ | 11-14-12 | PolitiJim (@politiJim)

Posted on 11/14/2012 1:15:32 PM PST by rightjb


There is an enormity of evidence that voting machines across the country did not accurately record votes albeit from poll clerks, poll watchers or actual voters.  A common cry heard from those wanting to simply accept these results is “you’ll never be able to prove it.”

Au contraire, mon frere.

Continued at: How to Prove Voting Machine Fraud

(Excerpt) Read more at politijim.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012election; voterfraud; votingmachines

1 posted on 11/14/2012 1:15:39 PM PST by rightjb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Pointing out voting fraud if you’re a Republican is racist.


2 posted on 11/14/2012 1:22:00 PM PST by walford (http://natural-law-natural-religion.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Meh.

If you can write software that swaps votes, you could certainly put a routine in there that erases the vote swapping routine after the election is held. Not hard at all.

The machines would have had to be tested BEFORE the election. Any software programmer worth their salt has probably already covered their tracks.

As SVP of Technology Services for a company, I can say this with a fair amount of confidence: the evidence is probably already gone.


3 posted on 11/14/2012 1:24:35 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

0’pinhead’s “the folks” be getting fid-gity methinx—i feels it in me bones.....

Semper Watchin’
*****


4 posted on 11/14/2012 1:25:58 PM PST by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

It doesn’t matter - Romney will not do anything that requires testosterone (or any other Republican leaders)


5 posted on 11/14/2012 1:27:05 PM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Well, all those points sound good but people are arrogant and like to brag how they got one over another person and in this instant they done did a good for their team.

You’d think at least a few people would have talked. We are talking about thousands in this conspiracy.

Then again, maybe Al Gore did win 2000 and John “Effing” Kerry didn’t lose to that idiot.....


6 posted on 11/14/2012 1:30:09 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

How to prove voter fraud in St. Lucie county, FL:

1) Count the number of votes cast in St. Lucie county
2) Count the number of people registered to vote in St. Lucie county
3) If #1 is more than #2, there is voter fraud.


7 posted on 11/14/2012 1:31:19 PM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

bkmk


8 posted on 11/14/2012 1:32:01 PM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd
How to prove voter fraud in St. Lucie county, FL:

1) Count the number of votes cast in St. Lucie county 2) Count the number of people registered to vote in St. Lucie county 3) If #1 is more than #2, there is voter fraud.

Yes, but that wasn't the case. The number of vote "cards" counted was greater than the number of registered voters, but the ballot was so long that each voter received 2 cards. The number of votes cast in any given race was ~70% of the number of registered voters.

9 posted on 11/14/2012 1:34:24 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

What seems to have caused you to excerpt your own blog?


10 posted on 11/14/2012 1:38:40 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Unfortunately the “140% turnout” number seems to have taken on a life of its own. We will be hearing about it for the next four years (at least) even though it is bullshit.


11 posted on 11/14/2012 1:45:39 PM PST by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

http://www.slcelections.com/Pdf%20Docs/2012%20General/GEMS%20SOVC%20REPORT.pdf

The number of cards cast, as shown in this report, is not twice the number of voters, which would be the case if each voter turned in two cards.

In District 63 “School House” the turnout was 154, yet cards cast only 105. Should have been 308 cards cast if they got two cards.

If what you say is true then each precinct would show a turnout of 200%, unless a variable amount of voters chose to turn in only one card and take, or throw away, the other.


12 posted on 11/14/2012 1:49:21 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Q1: Did you vote for Obama?
Response: No.

Reply: You are a racist.


13 posted on 11/14/2012 2:04:11 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Bread and Circuses; Everyone to the Coliseum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Found it:

” note* - turnout percentages will show over 100% due to a two page ballot. the tabulation system (GEMS) provides voter turnout as equal to the total cards cast in the election divided by the number of registered voters. also note that some voters chose not to return by mail the second card containing the amendments.”


14 posted on 11/14/2012 2:05:41 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

What makes you believe “rightjb”, a freeper since 2000, is a blogger?


15 posted on 11/14/2012 2:07:23 PM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Just the facts, Ma’am.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:rightjb/index?tab=articles


16 posted on 11/14/2012 2:19:07 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

Agreed. What’s the point of writing the software if it doesn’t work as planned.

Remember my first software edit. 1982.
It was basic , Artworx strip poker.
Every time the dealer one they lost
$100 and I was given $100.


17 posted on 11/14/2012 2:26:44 PM PST by Morris70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

What facts?


18 posted on 11/14/2012 2:26:53 PM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

The fact the he posts nothing but excerpts from a single blog indicates nothing to you?

Like maybe he’s just here to PROMOTE that blog, rather than participate?

Or is it just an odd coincidence, his posting record?


19 posted on 11/14/2012 2:36:00 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

I often post items from barnhardt.biz, but that doesn’t make me Ann Barnhardt.

There are very few blogs I go to, HG. Ann just happens to be one I like and read the most. The fact we’re both female is incidental.


20 posted on 11/14/2012 2:58:03 PM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby
"The machines would have had to be tested BEFORE the election. Any software programmer worth their salt has probably already covered their tracks."

As someone who has written lots of code, and designed lots of systems, including “LIMS” systems, (Laboratory Information Management Systems), I agree with you, but raise the conclusion: any system using computers to acquire and count secret data, where the data are not preserved, is entirely unverifiable. With laboratory testing samples are usually preserved until the tested material is approved for whatever purpose (in my case, for manufacturing pharmaceuticals). Without paper marked by the voter, paper preserved and counted inside the precinct, voting is a misleading exercise, and can not be used to honestly represent the choices of voters.

This view sounds extreme, but that is because most people assume no one would dare corrupt our sacred right to vote. A dispassionate analysis, and there are thousands of them, is one understood by police, by criminal lawyers, by experimental scientists and statisticians. If the data can be accessed before a count is performed, no assumption about their meaning has validity.

Some understand the notion of a chain of evidence. That is why OJ couldn't be convicted by the very competent jury forewoman. When all the physical data were collected by two people, but only one criminalist’s name appeared on all samples, corruption was certain. No jury could convict someone based upon unquestionably corrupted physical data. It is amazing that so few of the smart people could grasp that fact, and revealing that they blamed jury bias (nullification), probably because the jury was mostly black, including the systems analyst forewoman.

Not just this election, but elections conducted during the past several decades have done away with local precinct counts done in everyone’s presence, with sealing of ballots and transport, under the observation of all party representatives, is the best we can do. That previous mechanism provided an audit trail, not perfect, and slower, but verifiable. Without the initial public count no election can be assumed to represent anyone other than those controlling the counts, groups which are usually dominated by SEIU employees. The election was a charade. It was an explanation for what the far left is going to do to what remains of our nation's freedoms and economy.

21 posted on 11/14/2012 3:19:18 PM PST by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding

22 posted on 11/14/2012 3:51:16 PM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding; bolobaby
Agree (that all evidence is probably gone), and agree (The election was a charade. It was an explanation for what the far left is going to do to what remains of our nation's freedoms and economy.).

Sad.

23 posted on 11/14/2012 3:55:12 PM PST by Jane Long ("Miss me yet?" - Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer; Spaulding

That book was written when they had paper based voting machines; rolls of paper behind it, if memory is correct.

They had boxes to hold the result, but they still went missing/got stuffed, etc.

Get that book and read it, its really informative.


24 posted on 11/14/2012 4:53:01 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57; Spaulding
What the book shows is that this is entrenched RAT behaviour ,, it is pretty conclusively shown to involve not only local politicians but the complicit press (at least in Miami) and the hands off attitude by the Feds ... The CIA is also implicated as an enabler...

The machines at the time were either punch card or pull-lever and both were rigged... the punch card "voting" was done by the League of Women Voters (a RAT subsidiary) to change elections as needed and was caught on video by the books writers.

The 2000 race was also caught being "fixed" when the people stopped the punching of votes for Gore although by that time the ballot was larger than the original IBM punch card the fix is the same.

Everyone here needs a copy of that book before it disappears ,, I got mine used on Amazon for $0.01 plus shipping , they have a website where you can read it for free .. VOTESCAM.ORG


25 posted on 11/14/2012 5:34:20 PM PST by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Neidermeyer; WildHighlander57
Votescam was good because it was also a fascinating read. I bought copies of the videos the Collier brothers made inside the Broward election center, the one which probably drove the League of Women Voters president to commit suicide. Who knew that The League is a profit making corporation, and obviously corruptible.

I was always skeptical about the Colliers belief that the usurpation of elections by attorney's general, the Washington Post owners, FBI and others in power was the stimulated by the Kennedy assassination. But their reprinting of court decisions and FBI correspondence, along with the Janet Reno statute of limitations letter when there is no statute on voter fraud. The video record record of League workers punching holes in IBM cards, invalidating votes from Collier-friently districts, and the same little pile of cards being fed again and agin through the card reader left little doubt.

I went from votescam to reading the engineering research on voting technology, and came to understand that there is simply no technology today that can be considered verifiable. Quite the opposite is true. These systems appear selected to provide plausible excuses for unexpected results. Engineers in academia, not needing to deliver a revenue generating product, take pride in breaching the next expensive voting system, just as breaking encryption is a sport among bright engineers with a strong background in combinatorial mathematics. Breaking designs is a badge of honor and serves a valuable purpose of exposing weaknesses in designs.

Following this election it has become clear that different techniques are being used in different precincts. No one should underestimate the cleverness of these political revolutionaries. Many of them don't even think about the political implications of their perfidy. Many Google employees don't realize the use to which their control of information has been put.

I don't see the likelihood that the public will understand the core problem with voting. A groundswell of citizens demanding slow and old-fashioned paper ballots, waiting for a day until counts are completed is not likely to happen. The naive will accept the promises around the next generation iPhone-based voting system. Being so new, and based upon Saint Job's brilliant visions, it must be trustworthy.

I believe there is a path for those of us who produce, and who know that elections now marketing campaigns with no numerical legitimacy. As happened in a major way in the Soviet Union, we may need an alternative marketplace for our skills and products. I will do my best to deny my productivity to an illegitimate government that will take my productivity at the point of a gun. Ayn Rand nee Alicia Rosenblum saw what Bolshevism did to Russia, and described it with uncanny precision when she applied the Bolshevism to the United States in The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. The left hated her because she was Communism's most effective antibody as author of the most successful and widely read novel in American history, a paean of American free enterprise - Atlas Shrugged.

26 posted on 11/14/2012 7:00:09 PM PST by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

What most refuse to acknowledge is that it was unlikely that ANYBODY could have beaten the voter fraud planned and perpetrated by the Obama machine. They seem to prefer pointing fingers, blaming Romney and blathering on about Patraeus' sex life.


Col Allen West; "I don't want to see America become like Zimbabwe where people don’t trust their electoral process. If we cannot trust the integrity of the voting system then we are no longer a free republic".

Col West has opened the door.

We must fight election fraud.

It falls on ‘We the People’.

Silence is consent

There’s overwhelming evidence of fraud.- Here


_________________________________________________

SARAH PALIN speaks out on Twitter about massive Obama machine voter fraud:

>Sarah Palin News ‏@SarahPalinLinks Between suppression of the military vote and voter fraud, Obama stole another election. http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/46302 …DEMAND A RECOUNT! #VoterFraud

>Sarah Palin News ‏@SarahPalinLinks People need to stop pointing fingers within the GOP and investigate the Dems' massive voter fraud and suppression of the military vote.

MITT ROMNEY TWEETS ABOUT ELECTION FRAUD:

>MITT ROMNEY in 2012! ‏@PlanetRomney #tcot The Competent Conservative: Elections Have Not Yet Been Certified, Here’s What You Can Do:

>> These electi... http://bit.ly/Zzam8Y

Here

Excerpt from Mitt Romney's reference:

These elections are NOT certified yet. The only way to get this investigated, much less recounted or overturned, is through the Secretary of State of each of the five key states: Florida, Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. EVEN IF YOU ARE IN ANOTHER STATE you can help. But it won’t do any good to dilute our effort to challenge California or Michigan or other states. Until a major group gets involved to do more, here is the plan: Contact the Secretary of State of the state in question. See contact information below...

Read the rest- Here

___________________________________________________



The website,'Barack Obama Vote Fraud 2012' is keeping a running account of cases of voter fraud and what to do about it:

(Astonishing!) > Visit the site- Here
Sign this petition- Here

Another website:

Is There Enough Evidence of Voter Fraud To Merit a Recount? If you wish to add your voice, click here and sign the petition for a recount Here-

< Hannity and Col Allan West slam voter fraud Nov 12- Here

Photo of SOMALIANS brought to Ohio voting stations by the busload, 95% of whom did not speak English, and told to vote for Obama, straight Dem ticket- Here

Must watch videos!

VIDEO-- Programmer Testifies About Rigging Elections With Vote Counting- Here

VIDEO- Illegal Aliens Caught Voting and Stealing Elections In Florida In Vast Numbers- Here

VIDEO- MICHAEL SAVAGE: How Obama fixed the 2012 election- Here

VIDEO- Massive voter fraud discovered in April- Here

VIDEO- Whistle blower speaks out about voter fraud- Here

___________________________________________________


We can not wait for 2014 and 2016 to regroup and figure out new strategies. By then it will be too late. The Marxist/Muslim usurper will have completed his planned distruction of America. That's what people fail to understand.

We must act NOW.

Start with the election. If we let the Rats get away with this massive voter fraud, we're no better than a bananna republic.

We must keep digging and pounding him every day, in every way we can- phony birth certificate, Benghazi, Fast and Furious, his hidden life, records....

We are FReepers. We must fight!

Those who shrug and accept this atrocity without a fight are not worthy to be called Freepers!

Join us!! See thread, 'BARACK OBAMA FRAUD 2012- (MUST READ- MUST GO VIRAL!)' thread- Here




27 posted on 11/14/2012 8:52:15 PM PST by patriot08 (Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

There were a lot of counties in Ohio and others where there were more votes than registered or 99% of votes cast for Obama ( which is impossible without voter fraud).


28 posted on 11/14/2012 11:57:20 PM PST by rurgan (give laws an expiration date:so the congress has to review every 4 years to see if needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson