Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Prove Voting Machine Fraud
PolitiJim.com ^ | 11-14-12 | PolitiJim (@politiJim)

Posted on 11/14/2012 1:15:32 PM PST by rightjb


There is an enormity of evidence that voting machines across the country did not accurately record votes albeit from poll clerks, poll watchers or actual voters.  A common cry heard from those wanting to simply accept these results is “you’ll never be able to prove it.”

Au contraire, mon frere.

Continued at: How to Prove Voting Machine Fraud

(Excerpt) Read more at politijim.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012election; voterfraud; votingmachines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2012 1:15:39 PM PST by rightjb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Pointing out voting fraud if you’re a Republican is racist.


2 posted on 11/14/2012 1:22:00 PM PST by walford (http://natural-law-natural-religion.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Meh.

If you can write software that swaps votes, you could certainly put a routine in there that erases the vote swapping routine after the election is held. Not hard at all.

The machines would have had to be tested BEFORE the election. Any software programmer worth their salt has probably already covered their tracks.

As SVP of Technology Services for a company, I can say this with a fair amount of confidence: the evidence is probably already gone.


3 posted on 11/14/2012 1:24:35 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

0’pinhead’s “the folks” be getting fid-gity methinx—i feels it in me bones.....

Semper Watchin’
*****


4 posted on 11/14/2012 1:25:58 PM PST by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

It doesn’t matter - Romney will not do anything that requires testosterone (or any other Republican leaders)


5 posted on 11/14/2012 1:27:05 PM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Well, all those points sound good but people are arrogant and like to brag how they got one over another person and in this instant they done did a good for their team.

You’d think at least a few people would have talked. We are talking about thousands in this conspiracy.

Then again, maybe Al Gore did win 2000 and John “Effing” Kerry didn’t lose to that idiot.....


6 posted on 11/14/2012 1:30:09 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

How to prove voter fraud in St. Lucie county, FL:

1) Count the number of votes cast in St. Lucie county
2) Count the number of people registered to vote in St. Lucie county
3) If #1 is more than #2, there is voter fraud.


7 posted on 11/14/2012 1:31:19 PM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

bkmk


8 posted on 11/14/2012 1:32:01 PM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd
How to prove voter fraud in St. Lucie county, FL:

1) Count the number of votes cast in St. Lucie county 2) Count the number of people registered to vote in St. Lucie county 3) If #1 is more than #2, there is voter fraud.

Yes, but that wasn't the case. The number of vote "cards" counted was greater than the number of registered voters, but the ballot was so long that each voter received 2 cards. The number of votes cast in any given race was ~70% of the number of registered voters.

9 posted on 11/14/2012 1:34:24 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

What seems to have caused you to excerpt your own blog?


10 posted on 11/14/2012 1:38:40 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Unfortunately the “140% turnout” number seems to have taken on a life of its own. We will be hearing about it for the next four years (at least) even though it is bullshit.


11 posted on 11/14/2012 1:45:39 PM PST by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

http://www.slcelections.com/Pdf%20Docs/2012%20General/GEMS%20SOVC%20REPORT.pdf

The number of cards cast, as shown in this report, is not twice the number of voters, which would be the case if each voter turned in two cards.

In District 63 “School House” the turnout was 154, yet cards cast only 105. Should have been 308 cards cast if they got two cards.

If what you say is true then each precinct would show a turnout of 200%, unless a variable amount of voters chose to turn in only one card and take, or throw away, the other.


12 posted on 11/14/2012 1:49:21 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rightjb

Q1: Did you vote for Obama?
Response: No.

Reply: You are a racist.


13 posted on 11/14/2012 2:04:11 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Bread and Circuses; Everyone to the Coliseum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Found it:

” note* - turnout percentages will show over 100% due to a two page ballot. the tabulation system (GEMS) provides voter turnout as equal to the total cards cast in the election divided by the number of registered voters. also note that some voters chose not to return by mail the second card containing the amendments.”


14 posted on 11/14/2012 2:05:41 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

What makes you believe “rightjb”, a freeper since 2000, is a blogger?


15 posted on 11/14/2012 2:07:23 PM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Just the facts, Ma’am.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:rightjb/index?tab=articles


16 posted on 11/14/2012 2:19:07 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

Agreed. What’s the point of writing the software if it doesn’t work as planned.

Remember my first software edit. 1982.
It was basic , Artworx strip poker.
Every time the dealer one they lost
$100 and I was given $100.


17 posted on 11/14/2012 2:26:44 PM PST by Morris70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

What facts?


18 posted on 11/14/2012 2:26:53 PM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

The fact the he posts nothing but excerpts from a single blog indicates nothing to you?

Like maybe he’s just here to PROMOTE that blog, rather than participate?

Or is it just an odd coincidence, his posting record?


19 posted on 11/14/2012 2:36:00 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

I often post items from barnhardt.biz, but that doesn’t make me Ann Barnhardt.

There are very few blogs I go to, HG. Ann just happens to be one I like and read the most. The fact we’re both female is incidental.


20 posted on 11/14/2012 2:58:03 PM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson