The author
Posted on 11/16/2012 5:18:20 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Are you ready to wake up in an America where your family is defenseless against enemies foreign or domestic? This reality is right around the corner. A day after his reelection, Barack Obama signaled the United Nations that he is ready to sign an Arms Treaty to strip you of your U.S. Second Amendment Constitutional right to bear arms.
This is not new. The United Nations made earlier attempts during the administration of former President George W. Bush. But, President Bush soundly rejected the measure. Now, President Obama, fresh off of this presidential win, feels emboldened to go forward with his design to unilaterally dismember the guaranteed constitutional protections citizens of this nation are entitled to.
Do you feel comfortable with the idea that the U.S. State Department under the control of either Ambassador Hillary Clinton will truly represent your interest? What about her possible replacement nominee, America’s United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice? This is the same Ambassador Rice’s who went on five television network shows to cover up the truth of what happened to four Americans murdered on 9/11 in Benghazi, Libya.
Where does that leave Americans?
The real question is what are you prepared to do in order to defend your right to defend your family? Will you wait to see what happens? Or will you take the necessary steps to make certain that you will not have to wait and see if United Nations gun control officials knock at your door, demanding, and “Gun license and registration, please!”
The right to control your guns is not open for debate or for negotiation. It is a sovereign right that no foreign organization, including the United Nations has the right or the authority to undertake, because a president gives the go ahead....
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
The author
They're out of luck. All my guns and ammo were lost in a tragic boating accident...
If Obama signs it, that is directly impeachable.
Of course, nobody would impeach him, but it would still be constitutionally impeachable.
A LOT of people... maybe into the thousands or tens of thousands will have to literally die because of Obama’s blatant incompetence before anyone will have the guts to remove him from office.
I guess there are a multitude of lake/pond bottoms chuck full of lost guns and amo. ;-)
Yep
And I will never get over the awful out house accident. They can go get them if they want
Remember, the President cannot unilaterally sign a treaty. Treaties require the approval of the senate. The examiner article is nothing more than blatant fear mongering.
I know, I was there with you in that airboat and lost every gun I owned. At least we got that gator, though...
Doesn’t the next senate have a Democrat majority? Isn’t Harry Reid still the ramrod?
I believe it would require more than a simple majority vote to ratify.
IIRC...it takes a 2/3 majority to approve a Treaty.
I’ll give em mine one bullet at a time...
For a while now I have been predicting that there will be a second civil. At least I am not alone.
BTTT!!
They have so-called Republicans like Lindsey Graham, John McCain and Scott Brown.
What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts
You mean the 'Harry Reid' Senate? Think about that; it's not fear mongering, it's appropriate concern!
He’s a coward. Get enough people marching in Washington and he would back down.
What army, the UN? Really now.
The Dems have a 55-45 majority in the Senate, which the legislative body that approves/disapproves treaties.
McConnell has our back. /s
Don't you, and others, ever tire of that stupid comment? It's been beaten to death over the years--yes: years--on FR.
It's neither clever or new.
Dittos to that ‘Poss.
Abe reminds us from "the other side."
You initiated a policy to tolerate the Marxist-Alinsky radicals and let them rant; not only has it not ceased but was constantly augmented by decades of infiltration and indoctrination. You now have two Americas. In my opinion, it will not cease until a crisis shall have been reached and passed. A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half statist and half free; I do not expect the house to fall; but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other.
Obama is a biological-ideological issue of the 1960s Marxist-Alinsky campus radical, psycho spoiled brats -- and illegal drugs, BTW.
I hope the military lead the hostilities.. most likely due to the separate crisis of Obama Administration scapegoating the military to a point where there are confrontations at the highest level.. leading to violence between the Obama civilians and America's military.
Let's just get it over with.. it is going to happen don't leave it for the children again(!).. enough already with the 1960s Marxist-Alinsky campus radical, psycho spoiled brat Establishment's New Normal
Mmmmm, gator tail...
There are not 67 votes in the Senate for this POS treaty. Its not going to happen but be sure to email or call your senators anyway and let them know its totally unacceptable.
I gave mine away to the homeless.... :)
I actually did drop a toy gun down an outhouse hole. Almost made me cry. And I don’t remember exactly how it happened.
As for real guns and people who don’t think they’re registered. In 1976 I bought a .357 magnum at a Western Auto Store. (I was becoming a cop.) A few months later I left the “cop business” and sold the gun to a deputy sheriff. About 2 years later I got a call from the ATF wanting to know if I still owned the gun. I told them I had sold it and they wanted to know to whom. I told them I didn’t remember his name but he was a deputy in Craighead County. I then asked if the gun had been used in the commission of a crime. They told me it had but wouldn’t tell me what type of crime. I never heard from them again. So, as soon as they got their hands on the gun they knew who had bought it and where.
The American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.
Seems fitting it ends with the Colonists demanding to be disarmed. :)
You’re talking like the constitution still applied.
It’s gone.
I’m thinkin’ the next march would be a bit different than the 0bamacare march.
It's a required reply to any FR gun confiscation related thread.
Some other mandatory FR responses:
"Are you logged in?" in response to any computer help related thread.
A picture of Helen Thomas in response to any attractive female thread.
A picture of a bunny with a pancake on it's head in response to any thread that doesn't make sense.
I wonder if Obamagabe knows there are over 60 million armed citizens with billions of rounds of ammunition. I wonder if he’d know or realise that perhaps, maybe, the military will side with the civilians. Just wondering.
The constitution only requires 2/3 of the members PRESENT to ratify a treaty. Don’t need 67 senators...
I post to p!ss you off...
You forgot the manatee photos, hippos, Hindenburgs and Pitt Bulls.
Mark
As much as I hate to admit it, Richard Lugar would support this before his Democrat successor will
As much as I hate to admit it, Richard Lugar would support this before his Democrat successor will
In signing ACTA, President Barack Obama has again leapfrogged over the U.S. Constitution, critics charge. The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) was signed by the United States and several other countries on October 1 with little fanfare.
In wake of the recent uproar (and subsequent shelving) of the proposed United States’ bills SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Protect IP Act), however, many Americans are now turning their fears toward ACTA.
This is not surprising, as critics say that ACTA would censor the Internet even more severely than either SOPA or PIPA would have done.
According to Forbes:
Few people have heard of ACTA… but the provisions in the agreement appear quite similar to – and more expansive than – anything we saw in SOPA. Worse, the agreement spans virtually all of the countries in the developed world, including all of the EU, the United States, Switzerland and Japan.
And this treaty would trump all local and national laws.
Which is part of the reason critics, constitutional scholars, and one Senator is challenging Obama’s constitutional right to sign this treaty.
Obama claims that he signed it as an “executive agreement” which does not require Congressional approval. However, everyone else categorizes it as a treaty, which does require such approval.
Oh, there are more than 60 million armed Americans, or were you just counting the South?
Last I heard but you never know who’ll jump up and be counted. Since I’m home now make that one more civilian with a gun.
Sorry Claire, its time to shun them until you can shoot ‘em.
3,054,553 guns in U.S. MILITARY hands.
897,400 guns in LAW ENFORCEMENT hands in U.S.
Data from 2007.
If Obama signs it, that is directly impeachable.
No, it is an act of Treason.
“SeeBS Channel 5 in Phoenix really has their Huggies in a wad over this.”
I sincerely hope so. When the war starts, these whores should be priority one targets. They are the enemy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.