Skip to comments.
America, Conservative Christians and Third World Expectations
Last Days Watchman ^
| Julio Severo
Posted on 11/19/2012 9:00:33 AM PST by juliosevero
America, Conservative Christians and Third World Expectations
By Julio Severo
Evangelicals are fighting an uphill battle of demographics on issues such as gay marriage, Focus on the Family President Jim Daly told the Los Angeles Times after the election.
Last month, he said evangelicals and social conservatives were rowing against the tide with their focus on traditional values issues such as abortion and gay marriage in their political messaging.
His call for moderation basically was a plea for Christians to stop their political opposition to such issues in light of Obamas recent electoral victory.
His admonition implies that after decades, Democrats (referred to as socialists hereinafter) have achieved victory through a mass change of mind in the American people, who now want abortion and gay marriage. In part, this is true in regard to native-born Americans who became liberal after long-term exposure to mass indoctrination camps (aka public schools). Thanks to this indoctrination, they see, speak and dream socialism (aka Democratic Party).
And yet, there are not enough native-born liberal Americans to decide elections. In this point, enters the fantastic Democratic plan, and Ann Coulter explained it very well by saying that Democrats have profoundly changed the US demographics. She writes:
Most Americans dont realize that, decades ago, the Democrats instituted a long-term plan to gradually turn the United States into a Third World nation. The country would become poorer and less free, but Democrats would have an unbeatable majority!
It should also be added that as a result of this plan, America is today a less Christian nation. A recent AP story said that For the first time in its history, the United States does not have a Protestant majority. Evidently, an aggressive and mindless liberalism in the mainline Protestant churches that is scaring members away has been fundamentally helpful to the socialist plan, but immigration is changing not only the ethnic face of America, but also her Christian demographics and influence.
Under Teddy Kennedys 1965 immigration act, our immigration policy changed from one that replicated the existing ethnic population to one that strictly favored unskilled immigrants from the Third World. Since 1968, 85 percent of legal immigrants have come from what is euphemistically called developing countries.
America cant admit computer scientists from Europe fleeing their failing socialist continent, and she definitely cant admit Christians fleeing Islamic persecution even from Muslim nations invaded by her because she has to make room for Muslim immigrants. The socialist (Democratic) plan demands that the Christian demographics of America be changed. Christians out, Muslims in.
William J. Murray, chairman of Religious Freedom Coalition, told me recently, Muslims are being moved into the Bible Belt as they come in. Nashville and Atlanta are the immigration hubs for Obama to dump Muslims into the US. On top of that Mexican cartels are moving Muslims that cant get visas because of their associations in through the border.
Because recent immigrants have no skills, they arrive in dire need of government assistance. Their desperation has been an enormous boon to the Democratic Party.
Its not that poor immigrants think differently about most issues from conservatives. Try asking a recent immigrant:
How do you feel about abortion?
Its taking a life.
What should we do about criminals?
Lock them up and throw away the key.
Do you support raising taxes?
No, the government takes too much already.
How do you feel about overpaid, well-pensioned government workers with no-show jobs?
It ticks me off.
Do you support gay marriage?
How are you going to vote?
Yes, because Democrats give gifts!
This is true, for example, of Latin American immigrants, the most faithful Democratic supporters. US Catholic bishops have been vocally pro-life, but over 70% Catholics, most Latin Americans, voted for Obama and Democrats.
Latin American immigrants most certainly oppose abortion and gay marriage. The problem is that poor, uneducated people the Democratic base like free stuff that socialists with a D give them.
Brazilian people are not different. They usually vote for the most generous givers. And they have replicated their behavior in America. A Brazilian friend living in America told me that most of her Brazilian friends in America supported Obama. They are evangelicals who oppose abortion and homosexuality. But they like the privileges and gifts offered by socialists. In short, they will sacrifice any important value to get privileges and gifts. America would lose nothing if she deported Brazilians and other immigrants that put their personal comfort above traditional family values.
So Jim Daly has fundamentally misunderstood the current American reality. A conservative candidate does not need to tone down his opposition to gay marriage and abortion. If all he wants is to please a multitude of voters, he should do what any Third World dictator does: to promise lots and lots of free stuff.
After all, considering that most of the immigrants to America come from Third World nations, they have Third World aspirations: they want government to feed them, help them, etc.
Yet, to insist on lots and lots of largesse is not the Christian way to do things. The Bible way is:
We urge you, brothers, to do this more and more, and to aspire to live quietly, and to mind your own affairs, and to work with your hands, as we instructed you. (1 Thessalonians 4:10-11 ESV)
Conservative Christians should never tone down their opposition to gay marriage and abortion for the sake of electoral gains.
If immigrants, Brazilians included, voted according to moral and Christian principles, Obama and the Democrats would never win. But this raises a serious issue: what is the alternative?
The candidates facing Obama did not mirror the moral or Christian values of immigrants. They actually moderated and toned down their opposition to gay marriage, abortion and other major moral issues, exactly as Jim Daly proposed. And it did not work.
As a Christian, I could never vote for Obama or the opposing candidates and their moderate stances, which are immoral too.
It is too late for conservative Christians to stop the massive immigration caused by Democrats. These immigrants, who oppose gay marriage and abortion, are deciding American elections merely by choosing the guy offering the most handouts.
If a candidate said we have to work very hard to build our nation, he would have been elected by Americans two or three hundred years ago, but not today.
Yet, if he said if you choose me, you will receive a lot of gifts, his election would be guaranteed today, but probably not two or three hundred years ago.
Socialists have been successfully changing American demographics unopposed since the 1960s. Perhaps Republicans or conservatives should fight fire with fire and bring conservative immigrants from other nations. In this case, socialists would do what they have never done before: fierce opposition to immigration policies!
But where would Republicans or conservatives get millions of conservative immigrants? Even many Christians in Brazil and other nations are tainted by socialist expectations: they want government to do everything for them.
There is little hope for American social conservatives and their political survival.
How should American conservative Christians respond to the Third World change in their nation?
If they cannot go to the ends of the earth to preach the Gospel, people from these ends are being brought by socialists (aka Democrats) to receive the Gospel not the Social, Marxist and liberal Gospel that is destroying mainline Protestant churches in America, but the real Gospel, which delivers people from every evil, including socialism (aka Democratic Party).
At least, this is my view as a Brazilian Christian.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Politics; Reference; Religion
KEYWORDS: elections; evangelicals; immigration
As always, brother, it is refreshing to read your articles.
As you know, I have many Brazilian friends, both here in the states and in Brazil, and what you say is 100% correct. They loath abortion. They chafe at the thought of homosexual “marriage”. But they support 0bama, the democrat party, and the socialist cabal.
posted on 11/19/2012 9:17:34 AM PST
(Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
Mitt Romney said he same thing and even the Republicans jumped on him for it.
Basically ————The Democrats bought the election with taxpayer funds.
It’s an undeniable truth.
posted on 11/19/2012 9:32:37 AM PST
With reference to the ". . . mass indoctrination camps . . . ."
idea, the following listing of statements may be helpful:
It is excerpted from a series entitled, "Lessons on Liberty," by the Co-Editor, "Our Ageless Constitution" & "Rediscovering the Ideas of Liberty." The "Lesson" contrasts the Founders' Ideas of Liberty" to be taught to rising generations, with the Counterfeit Ideas being promoted in the "public schools" of America for decades.
IDEAS OF LIBERTY: (from Americas Founders and Presidents)
The God who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time; the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them. (Jefferson - 1774)
Statesmen may plan and speculate for Liberty, but it is Religion and Morality alone which can establish the principles upon which Freedom can securely stand. (John Adams - 1775)
The Sacred Rights of Mankind are not to be rummaged for among old parchments or musty records. They are written, as with a sunbeam, in the whole volume of human nature, by the Hand of the Divinity itself, and can never be erased or obscured by mortal power. (Alexander Hamilton)
Without God, there could be no American form of government, nor an American way of life. Recognition of the Supreme Being is the first and the most basic expression of Americanism. Thus the founding fathers saw it, and thus, with Gods help, it will continue to be. (Dwight Eisenhower)
The same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe, the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state but from the hand of God. (John F. Kennedy - 1961 Inaugural)
it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits, and humbly implore His protection and favor
Now the virtue which had been infused into the Constitution
and was to give it
the stability and duration to which it was destined, was no other than
those abstract principles
proclaimed in the Declaration of Independencenamely, the self-evident truths of the
unalienable rights of man
sovereignty of the people, always subordinate to a rule of right and wrong, and always responsible to the Supreme Ruler of the universe for the rightful exercise of that sovereign
power. (John Quincy Adams, on the occasion of The Jubilee of the Constitution - 1839)
"Today, across our nation, we see consequences of decades of gross neglect and outright censorship of the Founders ideas from textbooks and from our public discourse. We have allowed counterfeit ideas to dominate the public square, and the Founders principles have been crowded out. Unwittingly, many teachers and other unknowing officials have participated in the agenda of an unelected mind-controlling elite whose tyrannical actions have robbed generations of Americans from reading or studying the ideas that made America free. Like termites, they have eroded our foundations as effectively as if they had burned the books. Yet, not once have they been willing to call it by its rightful namecensorship. Once, in America, stifling ideas about the Creator and Creator-endowed liberty was considered unthinkable. . . .
"The ideas of liberty must be passed on from generation to generation if liberty is to survive. These ideas, when they are allowed to be examined freely, will prevail, because their appeal is to reason and to the love for liberty that is deep in the human heart. John Adams warned: The people of America now have the best opportunity and the greatest trust in their hands, that Providence ever committed to so small a number
if they betray their trust, their guilt will merit even greater punishment than other nations have suffered, and the indignation of Heaven.
COUNTERFEIT IDEAS: (from some of those whose views have dominated national educational policy)
The idea of God is the keystone of a perverted society. The true root of liberty, equality and culture is atheism. (Karl Marx)
Our thinking is enlightened in the degree in which we cease to depend upon belief in the supernatural. (John Dewey, father of progressive education and 1st President of American Humanist Society)
democracy is a human faith and movement, unencumbered by supernatural preconceptions. (John Childs, a protégé of John Dewey at Columbia)
the majority of our youth still hold the values of their parents, and if we do not alter this pattern, if we do not resocialize ourselves to accept change, our society may decay. (John Goodlad, 1971 Report to President, Schooling for the Future)
As in 1933, humanists still believe that traditional theism, especially a faith in the prayer-hearing God, who is assumed to love and care for persons, to hear and understand their prayers, and be able to do something about them, is an unproved and outmoded faith. (Humanist Manifesto II, 1973)
the most important factor moving us toward a secular society has been the educational factor. Our schools may not teach Johnny to read properly, but the fact that Johnny is in school until he is sixteen tends to lead toward elimination of religious superstition. (Paul Blanshard, The Humanist, March-April, 1976)
It [the Natl. Education Associations publication list] includes the delegitimizing of all authority save that of the state, the degradation of traditional morality and the encouragement of citizens in general and children in particular to despise the rules and customs that make their society a functional democracy. The NEA is drifting into exceedingly dangerous waters, and probably carrying more than a few teachers and pupils with it. (Chester E. Finn, Jr., Asst. Sec. Of Education & Prof. Of Education & Public Policy, Vanderbilt Univ., 1982)
Now, my countrymen, if you have been taught doctrines which conflict with the great landmarks of the Declaration of Independence
let me entreat you to come back. Return to the fountains whose waters spring close to the blood of the Revolution. (Abraham Lincoln)
Well, that sorta makes them whores, doesn’t it?
posted on 11/19/2012 10:04:53 AM PST
(Vast deserts of political ignorance makes liberalism possible - James Lewis)
Personally, I think the only solution, short of the second coming of Jesus Christ, is to get government out of the business of defining marriages altogether.
Let them cede that duty to the churches. Let the state governments intent on rewriting the definition of marriage busy themselves with writing civil union laws instead.
When the first fudgepacker "wife" gets served with a civil union dissolution request because she was two-timing the fudgepacker "husband" at the local bath house rather than cleaning house, they can put it on Jerry Springer. Let the gay lobby fight it out among themselves rather than messing with our institutions.
posted on 11/19/2012 12:11:38 PM PST
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
Polls indicated that Romney was going to win the election. The economy is close to Great Depression era conditions, and unemployment is almost as high as when Obama entered office. Economic conditions became so dire after Obama took office it prompted the rise of an entire new movement, the Tea Party.
Presidents rarely win reelection when the economy is in the tank.
So how did Romney lose a race that numerous reputable polls and pundits predicted would be an easy win, based on historical patterns?
Massive voter fraud.
There are massive reports of criminal activity
(not mischief, not shenanigans, as many term the fraud- but CRIMINAL ACTIVITY) going on all over the U.S during the presidential election.
Reports of machines changing votes from Romney to Obama, eyewitness reports of Republican poll watchers who observed busloads of non-English speaking Somalians in Ohio being instructed to vote Obama- the list is endless.
Romney lost because of this, not any other reason.
Nobody could have won against the fraud planned and perpetrated by the Obama Machine.
The evidence is overwhelming!
Go to http://www.facebookcensorship.com and see the documentation of their censorship and harassment.
Bro. Winter Christian Bible teacher http://www.prime.org
We can not wait for 2014 and 2016 to regroup and figure out new strategies. By then it will be too late. The Marxist/Muslim usurper will have completed his planned distruction of America.
That’s what people fail to understand.
Silence in the face of evil is itself evil. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.
What you can do:
Visit these sites:
Most of ‘Obama Voter Fraud’ activity is moving to FaceBook.
‘Obama Voter Fraud Volunteers
‘Obama Voter Fraud’ on FaceBook-
Sign their petition- over 99,000 and counting -cards, email
Another petition, The ‘We The People’ petition has 60,000 signatures and counting-
The best Obama Exposure site on the net:
The United StatesLibrary of Congress has
for inclusion in its historic collection
of Internet materials
posted on 11/19/2012 6:36:41 PM PST
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson