Posted on 11/23/2012 3:04:04 PM PST by DanMiller
Better to die on your feet than live on your knees.
I bet the Panamanian highlands look better and better.
All Hail Baraq!
But eventually quantitative easing is gonna blow up, and the takers will have to suck bilge water.
We do not use capitol letters when referring to Obama as god.
The capitol id reserved for God.
The Capitol H is not used for Him, He or other references.
It is reserved for God.
For you see there is a God and it isn’t Obama, even though he thinks it is.
FUBO you traitorous POS
Positively Capital! An outstanding piece of photoshop. I have a new favorite.
Liberals love slavery. Their only real objection to the pre-1865 chattel slavery in America is that the slaves were privately owned.
Praise him through the Obamaphone!
I can’t take credit...but it is good. Steal away! Cheers.
All groupies must bow down...In the sacred prescence of the Latex Solar Beef! Muuud Shark Shark Shark.
I use the word “ghod” when I mock Obama’s “ghod-hood.”
I’ll bow if Barry Benghazi’s “homeland security” boys put an AK-47 to the back of my head but I refuse to kiss his @$$ the way his cult followers (voters) do.
In attempting satire, it seems appropriate to get temporarily into the mindsets of those being satirized. I could, I suppose, have referred to Obama as a god, or as my Jewish friends might prefer, as a g_d. I did think, briefly, about doing that but decided against it.
[T]here’s a huge difference between current U.S. policy towards Egypt and its policy during the Mubarak era. Before, the foreign policy quid pro quo of a “blind eye” from the U.S. was the willingness to serve as a bulwark of U.S. interests in the region, including our interest in the security of Israel. But Morsi gets the same favorable treatment while tilting Egypt towards Iran and reordering Egypt’s relationship with Israel.Here's another from the same source yesterday:One can only assume that Morsi’s policies with respect to Iran and Israel, like his moves towards authoritarian rule, are fine with Obama. Indeed, it’s doubtful that, for Obama, the Arab Spring that he welcomed was ever about the triumph of democracy. More likely, it was always about the triumph of radicalism — the wave of the future.
To Obama, the perception that something is “the wave of the future” goes a long way. Like most hard-core leftists, Obama craves to ride the wave of the future and possesses the intellectual arrogance to believe he can unerringly discern that wave.But we shouldn’t overlook the strong possibility that Obama wants the Muslim Brotherhood to be the wave of the future in the Middle East. Perhaps it is that wish that causes him to conclude, for example, that Morsi’s rather unimpressive electoral victory in Egypt is evidence of a wave that will sweep away more moderate, pro-democratic, and pro-American elements.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.