Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now Obama wants your 401(k): Treasury, Labor on path to nationalize retirement
WND ^ | November 25, 2012 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 11/27/2012 11:17:14 AM PST by Perseverando

NEW YORK – Two years ago, as WND reported, the Obama administration was proceeding with a novel way to finance trillion-dollar budget deficits by forcing IRA and 401(k) holders to buy Treasury bonds by mandating the placement of government-structured annuities in their retirement accounts.

Remarkably, those financial professionals specializing in private retirement savings and the U.S. citizens investing in private retirement plans now face the possibility the Obama administration and its allies on the political left will impose rules and regulations that effectively abolish the private retirement savings and investment markets.

Recent evidence suggests government officials continue to eye the multi-trillion dollar private retirement savings market, including IRAs and 401(k) plans, eyeing the opportunity to redistribute private retirement savings to less affluent Americans and to force the retirement savings out of the private market and into government-controlled programs investing in government-issued debt.

Government takeover?

An Investment Company Institute study published this month found that U.S. retirement assets totaled $18.5 trillion at the end of the second quarter 2012, of which 3.5 trillion was in IRAs and $5.1 trillion was in 401(k) plans.

Since 2010, the U.S. Treasury Department and the Department of Labor have been holding combined hearings on various plans designed to introduce government-mandated retirement plans and investment options, including government annuities invested primarily in U.S. Treasury debt, into the private retirement savings market.

“This hearing was set up to explore why Americans are not saving as much for their retirement as they could,” explained National Seniors Council National Director Robert Crone, describing a recent Treasury-Labor hearing held in the Labor Department’s main auditorium.

“However it is clear that his is just the first step toward a government takeover. It feels like the beginning of the debate over health care and we all know how that ended up.”

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 401k; cw2; fiscalcliff; ira; retirement; retirementusa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: LostInBayport

You left out the main “why” reason why “Americans” (certain ones at least) are not saving enough for their retirement -

IRRESPONSIBILITY.


21 posted on 11/27/2012 11:34:32 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanAbroad

Against?
Probably not.

After?
Probably.


22 posted on 11/27/2012 11:35:46 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

I’m baaaaaaack!

Predicting the government conversion of 401(k)s since January 2009!


23 posted on 11/27/2012 11:36:02 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Bread and Circuses; Everyone to the Coliseum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

“less affluent Americans”? That would be me. So, all of you on here who have 401ks or IRAs, just give me your money now and let’s keep the government out of it. I hope people see the sarcasm.

But, here are a few questions:

If the government takes your IRAs and 401ks, do you have to pay all of the early withdrawal fees?

As I understand it, if everyone tried to cash in, OR the government tried to take it, the money’s not there.


24 posted on 11/27/2012 11:37:04 AM PST by Terry Mross (I haven't watched the news since the election. Someone ping me if anything big happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Pritchett

:: It’s private property, isn’t it? ::

I don’t care who you are. THAT, right there, is FUNNY!


25 posted on 11/27/2012 11:37:35 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Bread and Circuses; Everyone to the Coliseum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Fair enough.


26 posted on 11/27/2012 11:39:28 AM PST by AnAmericanAbroad (It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Not enough left after taxes and expenses.


27 posted on 11/27/2012 11:39:29 AM PST by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
The takings clause don’t mean shit to these rotten tomatoes. Neither does the 5th, 4th and 10 amendments.

In that case, we're going to have to reintroduce them to the 2nd.

28 posted on 11/27/2012 11:40:04 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (Cogito, ergo armatum sum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Duly noted. When I think of the average American, I mistakenly still think of the “reasonable person”, even though I was shown on the 6th of this month that the “reasonable person” was long ago stomped to death by a horde of Black Friday shoppers wielding EBT cards and Obamaphones.


29 posted on 11/27/2012 11:41:25 AM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Pritchett

Private Property? The government has shown that they can unilaterally sieze that long ago. See Kilo vs State of Connecticut.


30 posted on 11/27/2012 11:41:34 AM PST by fuente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Pritchett
Private Property? The government has shown that they can unilaterally sieze that long ago. See Kilo vs State of Connecticut.
31 posted on 11/27/2012 11:42:34 AM PST by fuente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

if you can be forced to buy obama brand healthcare, you can be forced to buy worthless bonds.


32 posted on 11/27/2012 11:44:29 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

They want to roll it all into one big pile to hide the massive shortfalls in union pension funds.


33 posted on 11/27/2012 11:45:53 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

“Get your money out - NOW! Get out! Get out! Get out!”

My company has a pretty hefty match so I will continue to take advantage of that. What folks close to retirement can do if they don’t want to liquidate their 401k is move much of it to a self-directed IRA. You would have more control. You can also invest much of it in munipal bonds and non-taxable instruments to help starve the bastards of taxes. Small step but every bit helps.


34 posted on 11/27/2012 11:48:01 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrB

these are reparations!

those kept down by “the man” are ENTITLED. The need obama phones, free xboxes, free booze, free cable, free edukashun, free cars, free bus passes, etc.

GHWBush created the mess.


35 posted on 11/27/2012 11:48:02 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
My matress wasn’t always lumpy.

I had a great aunt who lost every penny she and her husband had during the Depression. Their bank never re-opened after FDR's bank holiday. When she passed away in the 80's....well, let's just say her mattress was VERY WELL STUFFED!


36 posted on 11/27/2012 11:48:25 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

IIRC, BJ Clinton tried this during his admin too.


37 posted on 11/27/2012 11:48:44 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (0 bummer inherited a worse economy in 2012 than he did in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
“...the money's not there.”

There is a growing concern that brokerages and banks are not maintaining enough money on hand to pay depositors desiring to ‘cash out’.

My family cashed in the last IRA money in August 2008, just before the stock market tanked. We saw it coming way back then, and it wasn't just about the ghastly communists in the Obama Administration either, though they have certainly made things worse all around. Our monetary system is in free-fall.

We also cashed out on a large insurance policy this past January 2012. Insurance companies have usually invested conservatively in commercial real estate. Commercial real estate has generally been considered a ‘safe’ investment, but not right now as real property values have crashed into a fiscal basement. So, we cashed in then just in case the company went bankrupt. We took the tax hit and paid off the mortgage and car loan.

I am no longer trusting of banks or any institution holding deposits and am working towards getting off the grid. For me this is easier than for most folks as I have no dependents.

38 posted on 11/27/2012 11:49:59 AM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
do you have to pay all of the early withdrawal fees?

Don't be silly. "Early withdrawal fees" aren't there because 401k plans don't like the idea of early withdrawals--the early withdrawal fees are part of the tax code...in other words, the law.

If they can change the law to sieze our savings, they can sure as hell change the law about withdrawal fees.

39 posted on 11/27/2012 11:50:22 AM PST by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I think you got it.

0bama is implementing de facto reparations, wealth transfers from “Euro-Americans” to “Afro-Americans”.

Every policy of his has this as its underlying intent.


40 posted on 11/27/2012 11:53:37 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson