Skip to comments.Malkin: IMPEACH Obama + Hillary for Treason, Dereliction of Duty, and Non-Stop Benghazigate LIES
Posted on 11/30/2012 3:27:12 AM PST by Reaganite Republican
*** PING ***
How about we win the Senate and keep the house in 2014 then we impeach AND remove this traitor? Impeach him now in the house all day long and it wouldn’t mean beans to this communist controlled Senate.
We better do something and we better do it quick. The greedy, “Me! Me! Me! Obamaphone retards really stuck it to Americans on November 6th. They voted as though they had a death wish for America. Sane Americans better wake up, stop worry about who won the Powerball lottery and get with the program. The commie ‘RATS are playing chicken with our future as well as the futures of our grandchildren.
He should have been impeached at least two years ago, right after the tea party successes in congressional elections. Opposition on here then was arguing things like, ‘better to focus on just making him a one term president’. So, now in the second term even more than before, there’s no time like the present. Bring it to them now. Let it be public and debated and let it ruin the political careers of those who’d oppose it.
I would love to see one, anyone, of the PUB senators “Bork” Rice. She is a liar and is no more qualified than Harriet Myers was to be a Supreme Court justice.
But then again, there is no courage among the Republicrats.
If the PUBs cave in - and they will - they won’t be elected dogcatcher.
My thinking is if Obama and/or Hillary can be proven to have lied -and/or other crimes- enough Dems in the Senate may feel obligated to do the right thing... unlike Obama, they’ve still got elections to win, and IF it’s a proven fact...
I’m ‘Bullish’ on impeachment!
We've been taken over by obama ME-tards...
Or how about “obama stash MEEE-tards”?
Best strategy for us is to apply some pressure on ‘em... they need to hear your message, that they are DONE if they botch this opportunity... not to mention negleted duty to the fallen
I wish that Michelle and other pundits would quit adding a damn “ - gate” on to the end of every legitimate issue which is deserving of serious examination. As soon as the cliched “-gate” is attached, the vital issue is diminished — if not confused. We are 40 years hence from fricking Watergate, which was convoluted enough in itself.
Can you name even one time in say, the past 20 years, where the democrats have done the "right thing"?
you’d have better odds courting the electoral college to vote for Mitt
Too late for any of that ——
That's a joke, right?
Impeachment is a political act. A constitutional allowed coup d’état.
Without control of the senate, a conviction after impeachment is impossible. The Democrats have only one god, power. They have it, and they will not give it up regardless of what this administration does.
TREASON like the republic has never seen before...in real-time, pre-meditated, continuous, ongoing.
Somewhere in the Bible it say’s that it is easier t0 pass a camel, through the eye of a needle than fo a rich man to go to heaven.
It is easier to pass that same Obama through that same needle than to get Obama impeached by this House.
You would heve to pass Obama through, while Pelosi and Reid and maybe even Boehner and half dozen others were clinging to his buttocks with their lips.
Won’t happen. The Republicans are wimps, the public has gone back to watching 2 1 / 2 men, and the media has convinced the public that the deaths of Americans in Benghazi is just a Republican way of getting back at 0bama.
You got THAT right..
It’s not that the Republicans are wimps not trying to impeach Obama it would be political suicide. Hell he just kicked our ass in a free election and now we’re going to impeach him? Part of being an adult is facing reality.
“Opposition on here then was arguing things like, better to focus on just making him a one term president “
Opposition on here now is arguing things like, better to focus on just getting our own messianic obama, you know, like Marco Rubio
They say there is nothing we can do about Benghazi or voter fraud.....
To date, the media havent asked President Obama and his top officials, why? Why the administration-wide cover-up? Why didnt military help get to Battleground Benghazi?
IMHO, Benghazi-Coward Obama chose Susan Rice to be the perfect deflecting smokescreen for his Impeachable blunders in the Benghazi Massacre.
Susan Rice is female, Black, and above all Had nothing to do with Benghazi.
Why not ignore Obamas throwing Rice at the gullible RINOs, and call Commie Obama to testify under oath to a Congressional Committee?
Here are my three questions for Benghazi-Coward Obama:
1.) Are you HIDING INFORMATION from the US Congress about the Benghazi Massacre?
2.) Have you been LYING to the US Congress, The Media, or the American Public about the Benghazi Massacre?
3.) Were you, as Commander in Chief, GROSSLY NEGLIGENT about your responsibilities to protect and assist those four Americans who subsequently were murdered in the Benghazi Massacre?
Impeach! IMPEACH! IMPEACH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Malkin must actually think Bonehead and his GOP weaklings
have GUTS. And principal. They have neither, Michelle.
That seems to be the battle cry, but the cry is never backed up with any useful action...
Exactly...I fail to understand why people think impeaching Obama is even a possibility with the Senate under the leadership of that worthless POS Reid
Huge waste of political capital to even try
Now Malkin is talking about impeaching the ineligible ‘president’?
She is one of those who knows obama usurps the presidency but refuses to address it, instead she ridicules those who work hard to expose obama’s usurpation.
She is 1 of those who thinks we can defeat obama in 2012...
Now she sees that we can’t defeat obama, she talks about impeaching the ‘unimpeachable’ (obama is NOT really the ‘president’ therefore he can’t be impeached; he can only be REMOVED, as in expelled.)
IT IS TOO LITTLE TOO LATE!
When these ‘leaders’ validate his ‘presidency’ by fighting his illegal policies and whatnot they have openly given obama the consent to destroy the constitution.
How can we uphold the constitution when we have already given the usurper the consent to destroy the constitution?
I agree, it should be spoken (loudly) as the "Benghazi Massacre".
He hasn’t admitted yet that Ft Hood shooting was a terror attack. Hassan still hasn’t had a trial.
We’ll still be pushing back at Obama Jan 2017
There are 33 Senate seats up for reelection in 2014, 20 Dem and 13 Repubs. We need to keep all our Repub seats and win at least 6 of the Dem seats to get to 51.
Possibly tossups and need to go Repub in 2014!
It all changes when the EBT no longer works. The Metards traded our freedom for a free ride, but the car has no gas.
We don’t have to start a bloody civil war, the fuse is lit already, we just have to survive it.
You mean like the ballot box is broken? It is a reality that has to be faced. If you continue to plan while ignoring the elephant in the room you will end up to your neck in elephant poop.
Did they steal votes in Pittsburgh? It sure looks like it. Was their massive voter fraud across the entire US? If only that were the case. The US people have smoked the hopium and till the markets sober them up the people are going to get all the bread,circuses/ the Kardashions and free condoms they can eat.
I take my clue from the Old Testament. Until the people repent of their ways, there is no use freeing them from their opression, they just go right back to it. There must be a Moral reform before there can be a political one.
So the Hopotopia will run its course, and there will be famine in the land before this is all over.
“Opposition on here now is arguing things like, better to focus on just getting our own messianic obama, you know, like Marco Rubio
They say there is nothing we can do about Benghazi or voter fraud.....”
I agree. Messianism won’t do us any favours, and even people on here contribute to the problem by emotional outbursts in response to legitimate questions about proposed candidates. There’s not, fundamentally, much difference between us and them when there’s belief that ‘the leader’ can not be criticised or even questioned. Reagan seems to be approaching secular sainthood in places, but even he would have grave reservations about these developments, I’m sure. I think what we need to do is stop talking about this, and start putting another party together, beginning at the local level. If you’re interested, we can talk on this thread or mail me here. And that goes for anyone reading this. We don’t have to measure success by winning the presidency with a new party in 2016. I expect this will be a long-haul. But we can get started and we can make the mistakes we’re going to at the local level first, and more importantly, learn from them, correct them, refine, and succeed.
Defeatists, you can go be defeated elsewhere. I share your pain, but I have no more time for you and your exhortations that any effort is useless and is just making it harder for you to numb it with tears in your beer and old movies from before the fall from grace.
No one can take their ball and go home if the R candidate does not suit them--it's full speed ahead to defeat every Democrat--no exceptions!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.