Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/08/2012 7:47:59 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: lowbridge

Some version of Directive 10-289 to prevent the “rich” from leaving their punitive tax state coming soon !


35 posted on 12/08/2012 8:41:37 AM PST by Personal Responsibility (In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act - Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

I guess the so callled “rich” don’t want to be “eaten” afterall and are leaving CA by the hundreds of thousands. CA can rot and fall into the Pacific... It won’t be missed.


39 posted on 12/08/2012 8:55:45 AM PST by Jmouse007 (Lord deliver us from evil, in Jesus name, amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

A credible source pretending to be a reporter on a blog would provide their last name.


40 posted on 12/08/2012 8:59:30 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro can't pass E-verify)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

41 posted on 12/08/2012 9:02:34 AM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Conservatives will be blamed, and the MSM will support it.


42 posted on 12/08/2012 9:03:02 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

the libtards in Washington will bailout the libtards in California. It will be another too big to fail and libtards are emotionalists and don’t care about principles.


44 posted on 12/08/2012 9:06:10 AM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

This is a rather strange article: It begins by saying that high income Californians have “voted with their feet” and moved out of state, causing an increased revenue shortfall. But then it goes on for 5 paragraphs, citing studies and articles to “prove” that the “super rich” are not leaving.

My own anecdotal evidence suggests that the “super rich” may indeed not flee in large numbers: Generally they either “don’t feel it” personally, don’t mind, or can manipulate their finances such that the high taxes have little effect on them. Of course those same manipulations tend to damage economic growth...

I suspect that more important, what instead happens is that businesses gradually “bleed out” even if the top end CEO’s and such stay — after all, California is overall a beautiful / nice climate place to live. (If I didn’t need to worry about money, I’d consider it myself.) More important, new entrepreneurs and businesses look at the costs of a place like CA and tend to not move into it, depriving the state of vital “new blood”. Then add large numbers of people who are middle and upper middle class, including many retirees, who move to states with lower costs of living.

All said, reckless fiscal policies and a poor business climate probably harm CA more than taxpayers leaving to avoid the high taxes. But then again, all those factors and more are inextricably intertwined.


45 posted on 12/08/2012 9:10:34 AM PST by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

It’s a small example of the future of Al Amerika.


46 posted on 12/08/2012 9:13:10 AM PST by bgill (We've passed the point of no return. Welcome to Al Amerika.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

To the Socialist-RATs, no tax is ever enough.


47 posted on 12/08/2012 9:15:27 AM PST by Polyxene (Out of the depths I have cried to Thee, O Lord; Lord, hear my voice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

“The beatings will continue until morale improves.”


49 posted on 12/08/2012 9:28:18 AM PST by Moltke ("I am Dr. Sonderborg," he said, "and I don't want any nonsense.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

a. Tax increases haven’t hit yet.
b. Falling revenues seem more likely to be the effect of the leading edge of a recession. Earnings, sales are down.
c. The article discussed the sociology of high income earners. Which is fine as far as that goes. People who are wealthy in California aren’t likely to leave just because of this increase. The real problem though is that business formation and growth in California is busted. New rich people are more likely to start getting rich elsewhere. And there is the marginal effect of tax avoidance.


50 posted on 12/08/2012 9:32:58 AM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

The taxes on the rich are retroactive to 1-1-2012. How is that not a bill of attainder?


51 posted on 12/08/2012 9:35:28 AM PST by Excellence (9/11 was an act of faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

California has already gone over the cliff, of sanity. It’s now in free fall. Waiting, waiting, just waiting to hear the crunch as it hits the rocks below.


55 posted on 12/08/2012 9:40:40 AM PST by Flick Lives (We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Idiots.


58 posted on 12/08/2012 9:41:51 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge
The lower tax collection and higher spending drove the State’s deficit after the tax increase to $2.7 billion for the first 5 months of this fiscal year.

California, lol.

59 posted on 12/08/2012 9:45:24 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Ha Ha Ha


60 posted on 12/08/2012 9:47:01 AM PST by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

The addict needs higher and higher doses to achieve the high they crave.

Giving more taxes to Sacramento is like giving heroin to an addict.


62 posted on 12/08/2012 9:51:56 AM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

If you want less of something, tax it. Raise income taxes and income drops. Less income equals less revenue. CA isn’t smarter than a 5th grader.


64 posted on 12/08/2012 10:00:49 AM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Gee, this is so “unexpected”.
Raise Taxes and revenue falls what a coincidence.

Baaah, humbug.


68 posted on 12/08/2012 10:13:55 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

If you tax something, you get less of it. If you subsidize something, you get more of it. California taxes the creation of wealth, and it subsidizes illegal immigration. ‘Nuff said.


69 posted on 12/08/2012 10:15:26 AM PST by Hoodat ("As for God, His way is perfect" - Psalm 18:30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson