Skip to comments.Arizona Electors Question Barack Obama Birth Certificate
Posted on 12/17/2012 6:36:05 PM PST by Seizethecarp
The chairman of the Arizona Republican Party and two other Arizona members of the Electoral College on Monday questioned President Barack Obama's birth certificate during the formal casting of the state's electoral votes.
Arizona GOP Chairman Tom Morrissey said during the state's Electoral College meeting that Obama did not produce a "legitimate" birth certificate, KNAU reports.
Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer (R), who has vetoed bills to require presidential candidates to show a birth certificate to Arizona's secretary of state, said she disagreed with the trio's stance. Secretary of State Ken Bennett (R), the presiding officer of the Arizona Electoral College, also said he disagreed with what the three said.
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
Snarky comments about Barry’s BC at the AZ electoral round-up! But will one house member and one senator object on Jan 6?
hm, I think the courts would be foolish to go with their standard “you don’t have standing” approach because these are the electors: they have personal involvement and the ethical obligation to ensure their votes are for a valid candidate.
They value their lives too much and their country and Constitution too little.
She woke up one morning with a cut off horse head in her bed. She, ALSO, like so many others got the message of Breitbarting!!!
Their questions are a day late and a dollar short. I agree with previous comment. COWARDS.
Hmmm...since AZ went for Romney and AZ is winner-take-all, they all voted for Romney. But I would think they might have standing to have their preferred candidate not be defeated by an ineligible candidate. (IANAL)
Too bad Arpaio and Zullo didn't have a legal opening to at least make a presentation (or were denied one). The fix is in as far as the GOPe is concerned on the NBC issue. Heck, they still want to keep the door open for Rubio, Jindal and Haley as well.
I would like to commend the 3 for their courage in bringing this up.
Of course Jan Brewer and others will not back them up./
Jan has been duly chastised by Obama.She is scared.
we need to vote to remove any politicians who continue to cover this up
the issue merits review through the proper channels
and the American public deserve it be done per our Constitution
Thanks, and Ping.
Or perhaps she just thinks birtherism is stupid.... You know, like most people do.
... to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;-- between a State and Citizens of another State,--between Citizens of different States,--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
Under the last clause, one can make a compelling argument that any citizen of the United States could bring a case against Obama as a foreign citizen or subject because he's lacks article II eligibility for the office of president. Further, one could cite Fairchild v. Hughes which suggested that legal standing only applies in challenges against the Constitutionality of statutes (which is not at question here), and that:
Plaintiff has only the right, possessed by every citizen, to require that the government be administered according to law
The seating of a president certainly falls within this scope as there is a vested right for every citizen that the president should be Constitutionally eligible for office, and that ensuring this is executed properly is a matter of ensuring that the government is administered according to the Constitution.
The Huffpost article is poorly written - doesn’t explain what this means. Is this a legal objection, and what is the procedure as a result of this objection? Does this go to court? What happens?
Thanks for the ping.
If he doesn’t have a valid original long form BC, then he is an immigrant.
Subpoena his immigration records from DHS.
Based on no particular logic or evidence.
I think Carl Gallups may have oversold the ability of these “constitutionally authorized” AZ electors to accomplish anything other than grouse from the sidelines, which is why I called it “snark.”
Their job today, as I understand it, was to rubber-stamp the AZ electoral vote for Romney. They did that. They have no votes to withhold from Obama.
At least they spoke up, and generated a buzz that even made it to HuffPo. With most of the cable showing pictures of the CT “baby angels” (RIP) 24/7 I’m not sure how many folks will notice.
Domo for the Ping.
I continue to educate people nearly every day on the subject of the bs “Obama” life narrative and I also challenge them to think about what implications the problem of divided loyalties (presuming “Obama” is telling us the truth about who his father is, which I don’t think he is) has on the definition of Natural Born Citizen.
Jaded, yes. Ready to give up? Not by a long shot.
Libs don’t care.
I showed a lib the forged Selective service document. His reply? Bush did not serve in Vietnam and Cheny did not serve.
There is no rule the democrat party can break that will disqualify them.
This lib I talked to is a self described Catholic, yet votes for an abortion pushing pimp, that tries to force the leadership of his church to pay for abortions.
Logic does not apply with these people. It’s all about power. He’s a middle class guy who is jealous of the rich, and Obama is his tool to lord over them. It makes him feel power.
It's not just the Libs, or this would've properly come to a Constitutional head long ago.
Speak for yourself pardner.
Obama is no more qualifid to be resident than Hugo Chavez is.
Romney has standing. He’ll get right in there and do something about the voter fraud and the hussein’s eligibility....
The TinC (Thug) got to Brewer after she angered him by stabbing his chest with her finger and telling him off in public. And SoS Bennett has also been compromised.
How is it that the TinC can just threaten and intimidate all conservatives into submission? Perhaps all he has to say is, “Remember Breitbart.”
Thank you for the ping, Nully. I was wondering where this was going since the other thread on the subject. However, I can see that it’s going nowhere.
Brewer was Arizona's SOS in 2008 and put him on the ballot. Conceivable that she has liability. She is not an unbiased party.
They've been threatened. I'm sure it's with more than the mere loss of their offices.
And even beyond that, when everyone in Hawaii and DC who controls the guns that keep the secrets decides to stonewall on the issue, there really is No Controlling Legal Authority left to turn to. In earlier times, it might have been an FBI issue - certainly not today. Anybody talking about Mena, Arkansas, these days?
Unless the GOP has been working for years on an evil master plan to crash the economy with Obama in office so he can take the blame. /s
Like the court toadies in the "Emperor's Clothes," our representatives steadfastly look the other way. It is really alarmingly simple. What the WH lawyer received in Hawaii should match what the WH released on its website. Of course, as Sheriff Joe and the Boys document and what we already knew, it doesn't.
What the WH released is a "document" made up of bits and pieces of "data on file" in Hawaii. It's the equivalent of a Do-It-Yourself car title, or a homemade title deed. It is not a "Certified Copy" either. If this were a closing at Any Title Company, USA, it would not be acceptable. If the POTUS claimed to be a registered quarter horse instead of a horse's ass, with paperwork this bogus a cowboy could neither buy, nor sell him.
The SS#, the Selective Service Registration? ROTFLMAO and Oh Pull-Ease. This is an "identity crisis" and it's very old news indeed for The Mombasa MF. It's a replay of Barry's "voluntary resignation" from the Illinois Bar. What he did there was deny on his Bar Application having ever been known by another name (an "alias," in lawyer-speak"); neglect to mention traffic violations; drug use, etc. Of course, the actual proceedings are sealed, which is SOP in "voluntary resignations." My best wild guess has always been that in the ONLY case this guy ever handled, some bright opposing attorney noticed that the Bar Info did not match the "autobiography."
But so what? Where are we supposed to bring the evidence?
Most people voted for Obama. Given that level of competence, who cares what they think?
Well, yes, there is logic in that. So many pols seem to have some self interest preventing them from doing the right thing.
Bwahahahhahaha-——Man: You have a great sense of humor.
If Romney had any balls he would have done that before the election.
Or perhaps she just thinks birtherism is stupid.... You know, like most people do.
Read much, troglodyte?
US Constitution , Article II, Clause 5 :
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
By the time of their inauguration, the President and Vice
President must be:
natural born citizens
at least thirty-five years old
inhabitants of the United States for at least fourteen years.
Welll holly crapolinatas Longbow...the effing drafters of the Constitution were.........OMG!!!!!......”Birthers”
And there is NO genuine documentary proof that has been offered anywhere, at anytime that Barrak Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States.
” If the POTUS claimed to be a registered quarter horse instead of a horse’s ass, with paperwork this bogus a cowboy could neither buy, nor sell him.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.