Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: reefdiver

Driving is not a right; it is a privilege and therefore the state can require one to have insurance. In the second place, the only place where it is the purview of the frigging federal government to require car insurance is on federal installations and military bases.

Owning a firearm is a Constitutional RIGHT, and the federal government, nor the state has the right to require it.


7 posted on 12/26/2012 9:10:10 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

This is an ugly option. I have worried for a long time they might do this via homeowners/tenant policy. Just like car insurance it would land on the responsible gun owner...the crooks and illegals would still go without. They have nothing to loose. If they do this..we would need to start a cooperative insurance company..like USAA..to cover one another. Maybe that would be a good move..then that organization would be another one to lobby for our gun rights.


10 posted on 12/26/2012 9:14:07 AM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer
Driving is not a right ... is a Constitutional RIGHT

The constitution bestows no rights. The so called Bill of Rights is nothing more than an enumeration of limitations on the government to protect various rights.

From our right to life springs, among others, the right to bears arms to protect that right.

From our right to liberty springs, among others, the right to move about freely using whatever conveyance is standard for the day.

28 posted on 12/26/2012 10:31:01 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson