Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Now that the Bread and Circuses are over...
Vanity | butterdezillion

Posted on 01/02/2013 2:23:57 PM PST by butterdezillion

Now that the R's have caved and Obama is in full-gloat mode, let's move on to the Achilles' heel scary enough to Obama that his people have made threats to keep it quiet: football. Or, a football analogy, I should say. Currently there’s a call on the field more important than any call in any BCS game, and the stakes could not be higher:

Hawaii has confirmed that Obama's long-form image is a forgery and the record they have is not legally valid; the registrar cannot verify Obama's date of birth, city and island of birth, or parents' names - all of which were submitted for verification and by law must be verified if they can be. (You can look up the explanation of how we know this, at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf . )And all of which must be known before a person can qualify to be President.

We've all been wanting the question answered and now it's been answered in a certified legal document from the proper HI authority.

That call matches the forensic evidence that Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his lead investigator, Mike Zullo, have sworn to in affidavits. It matches the evidence I've submitted in a fraud and subornation of perjury criminal case against DNC Attorney Bob Bauer. It matches the HDOH's alteration of the 1960-64 birth index to include non-valid records. It matches the minimum of 3 birth certificate numbers from 1961 that the HDOH has switched around recently, and the forged death certificate for Virginia Sunahara.

So that's the call on the field. Obama has no birth facts that are to be presumed accurate "on their face" (prima facia). The claims on his non-valid record are legally presumed to NOT be true, and all the instant replays (evidence) seen so far confirm the ruling on the field.

If Obama wants to overturn the call on the field he has to call for a review and show the refs something big enough to overturn the call. HI statute says the record has to be presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body if Obama wants to make a case for overturning his record's current legal status of non-validity. That's not Congress; Congress is legislative. Congress can't decide this, according to Hawaii law. But if Obama doesn't call for a review (and he's fought it for over 4 years now), Congress (or any Congress member, presumably) can file a lawsuit to force a review. Or they can just tell him the call on the field stands and every electoral vote for Obama is disqualified for being fraudulently-obtained. Hit him with an unsportmanlike conduct penalty while they're at it.

Please call your Senators and Representatives and tell them that the official call on the field is that Obama has no legally-established birth facts and thus cannot qualify to be President. Tell them to either disqualify the electoral votes that are known to have been acquired through fraudulent nomination papers, or call for a review of the play by filing a lawsuit to compel a legal determination of Obama's birth facts.

The electoral vote certification is on Friday. Not much time. Please help.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; Sports
KEYWORDS: afterbirfturds; birftards; congress; electionfraud; eligibility; naturalborncitizen

1 posted on 01/02/2013 2:24:09 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Can you post a source for this? When did the State of Hawaii do this?


2 posted on 01/02/2013 2:27:39 PM PST by Fai Mao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Here’s the clickable link to the explanation for how we know Onaka confirmed a non-valid record: http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf .

The secretaries seem to be in full CYA mode, sheltering the Congressmen from seeing this information. When you call, ask them WHEN they will relay the message to the Congressman. Ask them to make sure that the Congressman sees a fax sent by Nellie Ristvedt on Dec 20-21 within the next day, since the information is urgent and critical.


3 posted on 01/02/2013 2:28:19 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; tx_eggman

You’re forgetting one important detail, mate....

The law no longer matters.


4 posted on 01/02/2013 2:29:46 PM PST by SpinnerWebb (In 2012 you will awaken from your HOPEnosis and have no recollection of this... "Constitution")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

““We hope that issuing certified copies of the original Certificate of Live Birth to
President Obama will end the numerous inquiries related to his birth in Hawai„i,” Hawai„i
Health Director Loretta Fuddy said. “I have seen the original records filed at the
Department of Health and attest to the authenticity of the certified copies the
department provided to the President that further prove the fact that he was born in
Hawai„i.”


5 posted on 01/02/2013 2:33:12 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

It’s at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf .

The short version: AZ SOS Ken Bennett asked Onaka to verify a bunch of stuff, including Obama’s date of birth, city and island of birth, and parents’ names. HI law requires Onaka to verify everything he CAN verify, and Onaka’s response didn’t include a verification of any of those critical facts.

Onaka did verify that the claims on the White House BC are also what’s on the real record. If the record was valid he’d thus have to verify those claims as presumably true. So the only lawful reason for Onaka not to verify the truth of those claims is if the record itself is non-valid and so Hawaii doesn’t presume the claims to be true.

Onaka also refused to verify that the White House image is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file” or that the information contained in the White House image is “identical to” the information in the original record.


6 posted on 01/02/2013 2:36:33 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

So who do you believe - the unsworn remarks of the same liars who altered the 1960-64 birth index so that it would include non-valid records, or the sworn, certified statement of the official legally required to tell the truth?

Which would you say generally carries more weight in legal matters?


7 posted on 01/02/2013 2:38:44 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SpinnerWebb

If we let this go now that we’ve got legal confirmation of Obama’s failure to qualify, then that’s where we’re at.

And anybody who isn’t shaking in their boots at that thought has a very poor imagination. Let me help jog the imagination: the same Columbia University buddies who are now visiting the White House... planned how to exterminate the 25 million people they expected to resist “re-education” when the communist coup was completed. The last step in the coup is the confiscation of our guns.


8 posted on 01/02/2013 2:41:50 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; bitt; null and void; LucyT; Vendome; little jeremiah; rolling_stone; Flotsam_Jetsome; ...

Again, I lost my ping list so I’m just pinging a few I can think of off-hand.

I called a few Congress members today, and the reactions of the secretaries lead me to believe that they are not showing my letter to the member of Congress. Ignorance is bliss until Bill Ayers’ bloody boot lands itself in your butt. If none of these people will step up to the plate now, America is really and truly over. Please help me get the word out and light some fires underneath these comfortable behinds.


9 posted on 01/02/2013 2:46:24 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

yeah it’s gonna be fun. especially when the armed services, the ones these libs love, tells bath house barry to “Go f@ck yourself sir.” when he tells them to round us up.


10 posted on 01/02/2013 2:50:31 PM PST by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

It seems to me that a battle/war is inevitable. The only question at this point is whether it’s going to happen before, or after, Obama shreds everything American about this country. If the Congress folks are worried about riots, another Soros run on the bank to collapse the economy, etc, I quote Aragorn from “Lord of the Rings”:

“Open war is upon you, whether you would risk it or not.”

I’ll also quote Abe Lincoln, who got it from Jesus Christ: “A nation divided against itself cannot stand.”


11 posted on 01/02/2013 2:55:03 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

I have 3 nephews in the USMC. I asked one of them yesterday, whether anybody talks about what happened in Benghazi. He said most of them are apathetic and just do what they’re told. I do wonder how the numbers will fall when it comes to the moment of truth. Propaganda artists always make it seem like right is wrong, and the undiscerning are easily deceived.


12 posted on 01/02/2013 3:15:51 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Well, the beat goes on against the Liar-In-Chief...

- - - - - - - - - -

“Newly Found Case Authority Filed In Florida Electoral Challenge: Florida Court Has Jurisdiction To Rule On Obama’s Eligibility & Fraud

As reported here Attorney Larry Klayman filed a motion seeking an emergency rehearing in the Florida electoral challenge. The case was originally dismissed last month by Judge Kevin Carroll. On Monday Klayman filed a notice of newly discovered case authority that shows the Florida court has jurisdiction to rule on Obama’s eligibility and fraud. EXCERPT:

NOTICE OF NEWLY FOUND CASE AUTHORITY AND SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR REHEARING

Plaintiff Michael Voeltz, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this Notice of Newly Found Case Authority and Supplement to Motion For Rehearing.

In conducting further research, Plaintiff has come across the case of Palm Beach County Canvassing Board v. Harris, 772 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 2000) (Exhibit 1), legal authority that was somehow overlooked by the court and the parties.

At issue here is the applicability of Florida Election law to the presidential election. In considering the presidential election, the Florida Supreme Court ruled:

“It is important, perhaps, to remind ourselves that the Florida Legislature has expressly vested in the voters of Florida the authority to elect the presidential electors who will ultimately participate in choosing a president:
Electors of President and Vice President, known as presidential electors, shall be elected on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year the number of which is a multiple of 4. Votes cast for the actual candidates for President and Vice President shall be counted as votes cast for the presidential electors supporting such candidates. The Department of State shall certify as elected the presidential electors of the candidates for President and Vice President who receive the highest number of votes.
§ 103.011, Fla. Stat. (2000). By providing for the popular election of presidential electors, Florida’s Legislature has also placed that election under Florida’s general statutory election scheme. Hence, there is essentially only one statutory election scheme for all elections whether the elections be for local and state officials or for presidential electors. The Legislature has not chosen to have a separate set of election laws for elections for presidential electors. The Legislature has chosen to have a single election code control all elections. So, we must interpret and apply that single election code here.” Id. at 1290-1291.

The Florida Supreme Court then concluded, “[i]n sum, Florida’s statutory scheme simply makes no provision for applying its rules one way for presidential elector elections and another way for all other elections. “ Id. at 1291.

The Supreme Court of Florida has thus conclusively already ruled that this court has jurisdiction to consider and rule upon Plaintiff Voeltz’s election challenge on eligibility and fraud. This court must respectfully grant an evidentiary hearing. There should logically be no need for Plaintiff to notice up a hearing, as this court had already committed itself to provide a hearing before it incorrectly and precipitously dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint. Given the requirement under Florida law that election disputes be adjudicated quickly, this court must respectfully set an evidentiary hearing and adjudicate the issues at the earliest time practicable. Moreover, the case is not moot. Indeed, in the now famous 2000 Bush/Gore election challenge cases, this Court proceeded to adjudicate the parties’ dispute long after the Florida Electors had met.

Plaintiff is available January 2 or 3, 2013 for a telephonic status conference to set the date for a specially set evidentiary hearing on the merits, as the law is now clear that one is required and that the prior dismissal order should be immediately vacated and set aside, as it was legally in error. [...] ... continued below... - Klayman’s Notice via the Obots @ BR and Jack Ryan”

It is important, perhaps, to remind ourselves that the Florida Legislature has expressly vested in the voters of Florida the authority to elect the presidential electors who will ultimately participate in choosing a president:
Electors of President and Vice President, known as presidential electors, shall be elected on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year the number of which is a multiple of 4. Votes cast for the actual candidates for President and Vice President shall be counted as votes cast for the presidential electors supporting such candidates. The Department of State shall certify as elected the presidential electors of the candidates for President and Vice President who receive the highest number of votes.
§ 103.011, Fla. Stat. (2000). By providing for the popular election of presidential electors, Florida’s Legislature has also placed that election under Florida’s general statutory election scheme. Hence, there is essentially only one statutory election scheme for all elections whether the elections be for local and state officials or for presidential electors. The Legislature has not chosen to have a separate set of election laws for elections for presidential electors. The Legislature has chosen to have a single election code control all elections. So, we must interpret and apply that single election code here.”

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/01/newly-found-case-authority-filed-obama-challenge.html

It is important, perhaps, to remind ourselves that the Florida Legislature has expressly vested in the voters of Florida the authority to elect the presidential electors who will ultimately participate in choosing a president:
Electors of President and Vice President, known as presidential electors, shall be elected on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year the number of which is a multiple of 4. Votes cast for the actual candidates for President and Vice President shall be counted as votes cast for the presidential electors supporting such candidates. The Department of State shall certify as elected the presidential electors of the candidates for President and Vice President who receive the highest number of votes.
§ 103.011, Fla. Stat. (2000). By providing for the popular election of presidential electors, Florida’s Legislature has also placed that election under Florida’s general statutory election scheme. Hence, there is essentially only one statutory election scheme for all elections whether the elections be for local and state officials or for presidential electors. The Legislature has not chosen to have a separate set of election laws for elections for presidential electors. The Legislature has chosen to have a single election code control all elections. So, we must interpret and apply that single election code here.

It is important, perhaps, to remind ourselves that the Florida Legislature has expressly vested in the voters of Florida the authority to elect the presidential electors who will ultimately participate in choosing a president:
Electors of President and Vice President, known as presidential electors, shall be elected on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each year the number of which is a multiple of 4. Votes cast for the actual candidates for President and Vice President shall be counted as votes cast for the presidential electors supporting such candidates. The Department of State shall certify as elected the presidential electors of the candidates for President and Vice President who receive the highest number of votes.
§ 103.011, Fla. Stat. (2000). By providing for the popular election of presidential electors, Florida’s Legislature has also placed that election under Florida’s general statutory election scheme. Hence, there is essentially only one statutory election scheme for all elections whether the elections be for local and state officials or for presidential electors. The Legislature has not chosen to have a separate set of election laws for elections for presidential electors. The Legislature has chosen to have a single election code control all elections. So, we must interpret and apply that single election code here.


13 posted on 01/02/2013 3:27:04 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

I think the Minority Soldiers are a lot more likely to comply with Obama’s orders vs. Anglos.

He will send the minority soldiers to the suburbs and the Anglos to the inner city with a peacekeeping mission, the others will be on search and destroy missions.

I have no doubts about this.


14 posted on 01/02/2013 3:29:04 PM PST by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao
Can you post a source for this? When did the State of Hawaii do this?

It never happened...to understand, you're gonna need this...

There's a birther legalese parsing algorithm that helps decipher the hidden message in Hawaiian Officials' public statements. It's like backwards masking...only more sciencey.

15 posted on 01/02/2013 3:30:50 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man (<-------currently working through post-election anger issues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

I notice the usual OB fools come pinging along...


16 posted on 01/02/2013 3:33:27 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
wasn't at the house today, will call Ayotte
tomorrow
I want to look my nine year old daughter in
the eye when she's 20 and say “at least I tried”

we got this and Benghazi to fight the usurper

17 posted on 01/02/2013 4:07:30 PM PST by paythefiddler (redefeat communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpinnerWebb

“The law no longer matters”

I doubt you actually believe that, or you would not be following these threads. I do not presume to know your heart and many of us are simply in shock that our country has fallen this fast.

We need people like YOU to do what is still possible, so that the worst of our fears are not realized. It is still possible to restore our republic.


18 posted on 01/02/2013 4:35:00 PM PST by notted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Yawn, yes the ole Fukino statement where she violated HI statute by not submitting documentation? As if the conflicting statements over the years by HI Dept of Health on such a simple matter wasn’t an utter joke.


19 posted on 01/02/2013 4:41:32 PM PST by TheBigJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

LOL, Win


20 posted on 01/02/2013 4:50:04 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Notice that she never used the word “legally valid”. And she never says that SHE verifies anything - only that the record “verifies”, which means swears. Even a non-valid record swears that what’s on it is true. What she is telling us is that the record claims a Hawaii birth. Just like Onaka verified the existence of a record which “indicates” (claims) a Honolulu birth. That statement is just as true for a non-valid record as for a valid one.

So Fukino isn’t verifying anything there.

But even if she WAS, I’ll ask you the same question as I asked Lurker: Which are you going to believe, the unsworn comment of the same liar who had the birth index altered to include non-valid records, or the sworn certification of the official legally responsible to tell the truth? Which kind of statement generally has more weight in legal matters?

And why DO you suppose the HDOH altered their 1960-64 birth index to include non-valid records, AND switched at least 3 1961 BC#’s around?

For that matter, why do you suppose that Fukino had the HDOH Administrative Rules illegally hidden from the public until a new “unofficial copy” of them was *created* THE DAY THAT A RESPONSE TO MY UIPA REQUEST WAS DUE, a year after the 2008 election was over - even though OIP Director Cathy Takase claimed the HDOH had a version of those rules posted online for her access all along? Why did a new “copy” have to be created and posted the day my UIPA Request was due after I had contacted the lieutenant governor’s office about the illegality of the rules not being posted?

By the time this is done, there will be nobody at that HDOH office who has a shred of credibility, except perhaps Onaka, who I believe has put out the red flags to let the world know there’s a bunch of crap being done by the HDOH itself. The alteration of the birth index and at least 3 BC#’s is just one small part of the crookedness in that office.


21 posted on 01/02/2013 4:51:40 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Thanks for the heads up. Unbelievable how all the cases couldn’t be heard because there was supposedly no “standing”, and then when standing was guaranteed the judges just waved their hand and said the issue had to go away.

Banana republic type stuff.


22 posted on 01/02/2013 4:53:59 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Also notice that the unsworn Fuddy speaking to the press attests to the authenticity of the copies the HDOH gave Obama - not to the authenticity of the PDF that Obama’s people posted, which Onaka confirmed as a forgery and indicated as having information that was NOT “identical to” the information in the original record.


23 posted on 01/02/2013 5:14:58 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

I think you mean dog and pony show. Bread and circuses is what Obama just got the kulaks to keep paying for.


24 posted on 01/02/2013 5:20:01 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Good point. I sit corrected.


25 posted on 01/02/2013 5:30:49 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

The general and field officer corps have already been pretty much replaced with “reliable” people. Some of those “suicides” the military is so concerned about have been officers.


26 posted on 01/02/2013 6:07:28 PM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE www.fee.org/library/books/economics-in-one-lesson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; Absolutely Nobama; aragorn; Art in Idaho; Aurorales; autumnraine; azishot; ...
Constitutional Eligibility

27 posted on 01/02/2013 7:13:37 PM PST by null and void (The world is full of Maple Streets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
conman, you're not helping yourself. The news release you quoted helps prove the point that you think you're disproving. In what you cited, former director Chiyome Fukino says she saw PLURAL "original vital records." Her October 2008 statement used the singular term "original birth certificate." She shouldn't need to change the terminology unless there's a difference in meanings. If the original birth certificate was valid (being the source of the information for the allged COLB and LFBC PDF), there should be no other records involved. By itself, it should be self-authenticating. She specifically changed her terminology in a way that means the COLB and the LFBC can't be legit because other documentation had to be filed before they could be accepted.

Second, Fukino has no statutory to declare anyone to be a "natural-born American citizen." It's a meaningless term anyway, because in this country, we are U.S. citizens, not "American" citizens. Thanks for helping to prove the point.

28 posted on 01/02/2013 8:08:21 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Butter,

I believe the fix is in and has been from the get go (ummmhhh...duh).

But the only way I believe this issue would even remotely stand a chance of being heard (but still dismissed - since it’s rigged) is for a FEDERAL CRIMINAL DEFENDANT to bring the issue forward.

Now, they put Col. Lt. Lakin in prison for six months - they know what they did - but someone facing a long sentence or even the death penalty might finally just force their hand. They should be made to own it.

It’s amazing it hasn’t already been attempted but most lawyers for criminal defendants seem to be bleeding heart liberals who would rather their client ..XXX.. than disturb the rule of the usurping boy king of the bath-house.

So if this attempt to get congress and the electoral college fail, maybe someone should start contacting defense attorneys.


29 posted on 01/02/2013 8:36:01 PM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Placemark and hope to communicate with you tomorrow.


30 posted on 01/02/2013 9:29:09 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: notted; butterdezillion; tx_eggman
I doubt you actually believe that, or you would not be following these threads. I do not presume to know your heart and many of us are simply in shock that our country has fallen this fast.

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them...

Yes, indeed, FRiend. Some Laws are very important!
31 posted on 01/03/2013 7:41:59 AM PST by SpinnerWebb (In 2012 you will awaken from your HOPEnosis and have no recollection of this... "Constitution")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SpinnerWebb

Thank you for clarifying your thoughts, you made a (Perfect Point of light). Natural Law is fundamental to our survival, IMHO. I just hope we can avoid the pain of separation.


32 posted on 01/03/2013 8:19:31 AM PST by notted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

This is C&P’ed from http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/vital-records/vital_records.html and shows the procedures for requesting a letter of verification. Note that it says they will verify the existence of the record AND ANY OTHER INFORMATION THAT THE APPLICANT PROVIDES TO BE VERIFIED RELATING TO THE VITAL EVENT. Ken Bennett’s letter of request says, “In addition to the items to be verified in the attached form, please verify....” Bennett did not exclude any items from the attached form (the application form) so he is clearly submitting it ALL, and according to the HDOH’s own statement, they will verify ANY information submitted for verification.

HAWAII.GOV

Home
About DOH

Health Topics

Hawai’i
Maui
Kaua’i
Newsroom

Employment
Search:

About Vital Records | Civil Unions | Marriage License | Marriage Performers | Reciprocal Beneficiary Relationships
Who is Eligible to Apply for Certified Copies of Vital Records?

For more information go to: Who is Eligible to Apply for Certified Copies of Vital Records

How to Apply for Certified Copies of Vital Records

All applications requesting certified copies of birth, death, civil union, marriage, and divorce certificates must generally be made in writing (application forms may be downloaded from this site - see below). Requests may also be placed for birth and marriage certificates on a limited basis through the Internet (www.ehawaii.gov/ohsm). Telephone, FAX, or e-mail requests are not accepted.

The Office of Health Status Monitoring only has divorce records from July 1951 to December 2002. All other divorce records are kept in the court where the divorce took place.

Fees for certified copies of birth, death, civil union, marriage, and divorce certificates are identical:
$10.00 for the first copy of each certificate, and
$4.00 for each additional copy of the same certificate ordered at the same time.

There is an additional fee for requests made through the Internet as follows:
$1.50 for a request of one (the first) copy of each certificate, if the requested certificate is found, or for the cost of conducting the search, if the requested certificate is not found, and
$0.25 for each additional copy of the same certificate ordered at the same time.

Fees may be paid by cash (except for applications made by postal mail), money order, certified check, or cashier’s check - make money order and checks payable to the State Department of Health.

PERSONAL CHECKS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

Fees must be paid by a charge to a credit card for requests made through the Internet.

All fees for certified copies are payable in advance and nonrefundable. If no record is found after a search is conducted, the fees are retained to cover the cost of the search.

Once an order has been received and processed, a $10.00 fee will be charged for any request to make changes to the order.
Apply In Person

Walk-in service is available:

Days - Monday through Friday (excluding holidays)
Hours - 7:45 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
Location - Room 103 (1st floor) of the Health Department building, 1250 Punchbowl Street (corner of Beretania and Punchbowl Streets)
When applying in person, the applicant must show a valid government-issued photo ID, such as a State ID, driver’s license, etc.

Certified copies are usually not issued on the day the application is made. Same-Day service may be provided upon presentation of written documentation establishing the need for urgency. Certified copies will normally be available for pick-up about 10 working days after the request is approved. The pick-up time may be extended for records that are very old, because the search to locate the record may take longer, or in the process of being filed, because the official record is still being created.

Application forms are available in the building’s lobby area and should be filled in prior to coming to the counter in Room 103.

Apply by Mail

Send mail-in applications to the following address:

State Department of Health
Office of Health Status Monitoring
Issuance/Vital Statistics Section
P.O. Box 3378
Honolulu, HI 96801

When applying by mail, the applicant must include a photocopy of his/her government-issued photo ID, such as a State ID, driver’s license, etc.

PERSONAL CHECKS WILL BE REJECTED AND RETURNED WITH THE APPLICATION TO THE APPLICANT.

Certified copies will normally be sent out within 6-8 weeks after receipt and approval of the application. The return time may be extended for records that are very old, because the search to locate the record may take longer, or in the process of being filed, because the official record is still being created.

What Information You Should Be Prepared to Provide

An applicant/requestor must provide the information needed to 1) establish his/her direct and tangible interest in the record and 2) locate the desired record. This will normally include:

Applicant’s name, address, and telephone number(s);
Applicant’s relationship to the person named on the certificate;
Reason why you are requesting the certificate;
Full name(s) as listed on the certificate;
The certificate’s file number (if known);
Month, day, and year of the event; and
City or town and the island where the event occurred.
For birth certificates, also provide the full name of the father and the full maiden name of the mother.
If you are applying for a certificate on behalf of someone else, you must provide an original letter signed by that person authorizing the release of their certificate to you and a photocopy of that person’s valid government-issued photo ID.
Valid government-issued photo ID.
Letters of Verification

Letters of verification may be issued in lieu of certified copies (HRS §338-14.3). This document verifies the existence of a birth/death/civil union/marriage/divorce certificate on file with the Department of Health and any other information that the applicant provides to be verified relating to the vital event. (For example, that a certain named individual was born on a certain date at a certain place.) The verification process will not, however, disclose information about the vital event contained within the certificate that is unknown to and not provided by the applicant in the request.

Letters of verification are requested in similar fashion and using the same request forms as for certified copies.

The fee for a letter of verification is $5 per letter.

Application Forms

Application forms are available in a “fillable” Adobe Acrobat portable document format (PDF).

The Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and install on your computer by clicking on the button:

Download Request For Certified Copy of Birth Record
Download Request For Certified Copy of Death Record
Download Request For Certified Copy of Civil Union Record (Not Form Fillable)
Download Request For Certified Copy of Marriage Record
Download Request For Certified Copy of Divorce Record
Further Information and Assistance

If you require further information about applying for certified copies of vital records or want to check on the status of an accepted request for certified copies of vital records, call (808) 586-4539 or (808) 586-4542 during regular business hours.

Disclaimer and Terms of Use
Hawaii State Department of Health · 1250 Punchbowl Street · Honolulu, HI 96813


33 posted on 01/03/2013 8:32:39 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson