Can you post a source for this? When did the State of Hawaii do this?
“We hope that issuing certified copies of the original Certificate of Live Birth to
President Obama will end the numerous inquiries related to his birth in Hawaii, Hawaii
Health Director Loretta Fuddy said. I have seen the original records filed at the
Department of Health and attest to the authenticity of the certified copies the
department provided to the President that further prove the fact that he was born in
Hawaii.
It’s at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/complete-klayman-letter-to-bauer.pdf .
The short version: AZ SOS Ken Bennett asked Onaka to verify a bunch of stuff, including Obama’s date of birth, city and island of birth, and parents’ names. HI law requires Onaka to verify everything he CAN verify, and Onaka’s response didn’t include a verification of any of those critical facts.
Onaka did verify that the claims on the White House BC are also what’s on the real record. If the record was valid he’d thus have to verify those claims as presumably true. So the only lawful reason for Onaka not to verify the truth of those claims is if the record itself is non-valid and so Hawaii doesn’t presume the claims to be true.
Onaka also refused to verify that the White House image is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file” or that the information contained in the White House image is “identical to” the information in the original record.
It never happened...to understand, you're gonna need this...
There's a birther legalese parsing algorithm that helps decipher the hidden message in Hawaiian Officials' public statements. It's like backwards masking...only more sciencey.