Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Link to Gun Registration is Gun Confiscation article at the site.
1 posted on 01/13/2013 6:48:34 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Before confiscation, registration leads to taxation of guns.

This will be interesting to watch. This issue, especially if they are successful in requiring universal registration of guns as “Universal Background Checks’ will lead to as posited here.

Americans will be surprised to find out the intelligence that the government has on each individual, and with this issue, the willingness to use this intel against each and every American to benefit government.


2 posted on 01/13/2013 6:56:37 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

I have a more effective solution.

Let’s redefine who is a prohibited person. OK, so we keep people ajudicated mentally defective, but I say we limit felons to those who commit violent or serious crimes on the list. I am not concerned about the folks who recieved felonies for victimless crimes such as running afoul of EPA regulations or scamming an insurance company. I’m talking about felons who are a physical threat to society.

Once we’ve done this, require a mandatory 5 year sentence for posession.. in addition and on top of any other crime they may or may not have committed.

The other thing we need to do is have tougher sentencing for violent felons.

This will have a far greater effect than background checks.

I’m sick and tired of listening to gun control. I wan’t criminal control.


3 posted on 01/13/2013 7:11:19 AM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
This sounds like a good way to get background check data for all your lib neighbors. Just pop their names into the system.
5 posted on 01/13/2013 7:33:37 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
I think we need a gun-grabber to lawful-gun-owner translation dictionary.

Let's start with the ever-creeping definiton of "assault weapon". I have no intent to assault anyone. How about "balanced capabilty defensive weapon"? Mean-looking black folding stocks, or evil hand grips instantly converts a soft-look Elmer Fudd-style shotgun into an eeevil assault weapon. A semi-automatic pistol is starting to creep into the defintion because the word "automatic" is in there leading some dimwit to think that the pistol will shoot people all on its own.

The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with hunting. Personal protection does not limit you to the 4 corners of your dwelling (hence the mandate for ILL-ANNOY to some up with a CC law in less than 30 days). You have the right of self defense wherever you are - per the courts.

7 posted on 01/13/2013 7:43:44 AM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
How about we talk about background checks on Presidential candidates or voters? Funny how the Dems can advocate this while simultaneously denying voters need to show identification. Last time I checked, Obama can kill a lot more people, a lot quicker, than I can with a 38 but no one vetted him before he was given that authority.
8 posted on 01/13/2013 7:45:20 AM PST by liberalh8ter (If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

OK, all drug dealers line up to be registered, please. /s


10 posted on 01/13/2013 8:00:03 AM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

11 posted on 01/13/2013 8:01:01 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Under a ‘gun ban’, they say that you cannot hand down any firearms to your intended recipient.

Simple!

Notify ‘intended recipient’ you are putting out the trash while you are ill, and would the intended recipient take it to wherever. Transfer complete. “I didn’t want to sell it, couldn’t give it away, so I threw it out in the garbage.”


16 posted on 01/13/2013 8:26:09 AM PST by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
Amen. If you require universal background checks for all firearm transactions including face-to-face within your own state, then you also need to "prove" that the background check was done. That means that a record of the sale needs to be kept somewhere.

Once a record is kept, then it is easy if a Feinstein ban on a class of weapons is made, the Government can send you a letter saying "bring in your Daniel Defense AR-15 serial number xxxxx to your local Police Department by xx/xx/xx for disposal. Refusal to comply will result in criminal and civil prosecution."

Me paranoid? You betcha.

18 posted on 01/13/2013 8:42:22 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

How about a red flag against traitors to the government who are following orders from an illegally elected POTUS?
According to the REAL database these individuals are guilty of mass 2A infringements.


20 posted on 01/13/2013 9:07:35 AM PST by Eye of Unk (AR2 2013 is the American Revolution part 2 of 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Gun registration, the lib’s desire since 1962 when Thomas J Dodd and Emanuel Cellar called for the registration of all handguns only. Long guns will not be affected they said.

That didn’t last long.

By 1964 they wanted the registration of all guns.

By 1980 Handgun control Inc still was demanding the control of all handguns. Long guns will not be affected.

That didn’t last long.

Here is what the founder of HCI said.

Nelson T. ‘Pete’ Shields
Founder of Handgun Control, Inc.

“I’m convinced that we have to have federal legislation to build on. We’re going to have to take one step at a time, and the first step is necessarily — given the political realities — going to be very modest. Of course, it’s true that politicians will then go home and say, ‘This is a great law. The problem is solved.’ And it’s also true that such statements will tend to defuse the gun-control issue for a time.

So then we’ll have to strengthen that law, and then again to strengthen that law, and maybe again and again. Right now, though, we’d be satisfied not with half a loaf but with a slice. Our ultimate goal — total control of handguns in the United States — is going to take time. My estimate is from seven to ten years.

The problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns sold in this country. The second problem is to get them all registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition — except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors — totally illegal.”

-Pete Shields, Chairman and founder, Handgun Control Inc., “A Reporter At Large: Handguns,” The New Yorker, July 26, 1976, 57-58


22 posted on 01/13/2013 9:30:39 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name! See new paintings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson