Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Is the U.S. Prison Population So Large?
/www.learnliberty.org ^ | January 7, 2013 | Speaker Daniel D'Amico

Posted on 01/13/2013 10:41:06 AM PST by redreno

The United States houses more human beings in prisons than any other country, both in terms of actual numbers and in relation to population size. The U.S. prison population began to grow dramatically in the 1970s. Professor Daniel D’Amico examines the data behind the alarming increase in the number of prisoners in the United States and finds that much of the growth in the last 40 years has been driven by the war on drugs.

From 1980 to 1990, the total U.S. prison population more than doubled. In that same time, the proportion of people in prison for nonviolent drug crimes rose from 7.5 percent to 24 percent. Prof. D’Amico says this statistic actually understates the influence of the drug war on the prison population because drug prohibition also increases violent crime by leading to the formation of gangs and cartels. By 2000, the prison population had nearly doubled again, but the proportion of prisoners due to drug-related offenses remained similar.

(Excerpt) Read more at videos ...


TOPICS: Government; Society
KEYWORDS: addiction; capitalpunishment; corrections; drugs; inmates; libertarians; medicalmarijuana; mentalillness; prison; psychology; skinheadsonfr; warondrugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: jjotto

Thought you might quote a different statistic. Sometime in the last few years, either the WaPo or NYT had an article pondering the deep mystery of why, with crime rates dropping, we still kept large numbers of people in prison. They simply could see no connection between large numbers of criminals locked away and the streets becoming safer.

A large number of people in prison is not in itself a bad thing. The best cure for recidivism is capital punishment, but long prison terms at least delay it.


41 posted on 01/13/2013 4:53:37 PM PST by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: redreno

the dirty little secret is that petty crimes don’t go to a jury but usually the perpetrator is offered a plea bargain for a lesser charge. One of the favorite charges is drug related crime, which are easier to prove (when drugs are found on a guy) than going to court and getting someone to testify against them for the real crime of assualt and battery or theft (especially since often these witnesses fear retaliation and don’t show up).


42 posted on 01/13/2013 4:56:22 PM PST by LadyDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redreno

The headline question is obviously loaded. The question implies the answer that the population is too large.

There should be no discussion of this issue until the form of the question is agreed on. The proper question in my opinion is, Is the prison population of the US as large as it needs to be?


43 posted on 01/13/2013 5:18:38 PM PST by Cincinnatus.45-70 (What do DemocRats enjoy more than a truckload of dead babies? Unloading them with a pitchfork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lionheartusa1

I also have to think of the decision made in the 60s that mental institutions were bad. As a result “insane asylums” were closed and all the crazies were let go on the streets.

We now have a huge potion of the prison population that can only be described as mentally ill.

This is also the problem we are dealing with right now with mentally illl people getting fire arms. The laws changed so that no matter how whacked out a person is ... no matter how obviously unhinged .... you cannot be taken in until you commit a crime.

Adam Lanza, a raving maniac, had he lived, would now be in the prison population. So we have fewer lunatic asylums and much larger prisons IMO.


44 posted on 01/13/2013 5:26:07 PM PST by BunnySlippers (Yes, they have. Don't you read?I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: boop

It makes for a handy argument (”if we’d only legalize drugs our prisons would be half as full”) but it makes as much sense as so many other arguments made in the political arena - pick your favorite one - you can raise revenue by raising taxes, if guns were illegal criminals would gladly give them up, welfare doesn’t create a dependency class, if we only gave up our weapons our enemies would give up theirs etc. etc.

All basically examples of sophomoric thinking.


45 posted on 01/13/2013 5:50:07 PM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: virgil283
"...So when you hear of nonviolent offenders remember some just didn't get caught being violent..."

...So when you hear of nonviolent offenders remember some just didn't get caught or found guilty of being violent..."

Fixed it. ;)

46 posted on 01/14/2013 12:28:48 AM PST by Does so (Dims don't think ... they PLOT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: familyop
As for a “war on drugs,” that hasn’t happened.

Would a real war on drugs carried out by our armed forces happen only on foreign soil, or also in the USA?

47 posted on 01/14/2013 7:46:21 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson