the Defendant and SCOTUS:
“How can we further serve and submit to you, our Master and our King.”
Posted on 01/13/2013 10:59:13 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
Those who support Attorney Orly Taitz’s challenge to Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as President are being urged to protest peacefully at inauguration proceedings on January 21, (the MLK, Jr. holiday,) and in front of the Supreme Court itself on February 15th when Justices will decide the merits of the challenge. Those making this unnecessary plea seem to forget that conservatives are always peaceful, even when confronted with the most inexcusable of antics by the other side.
“Well done, Doctor and good luck,” says licensed private investigator Neil Sankey to Orly Taitz on her website. “I will WALK there if necessary and if you need me,” he adds, offering his services during the upcoming Court conference. Along with Private Investigator Susan Daniels, Sankey generated a large public, social security data base in a lengthy research...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
They’re demanding background checks on our citizens, but not any on the inhabitant of the white hut!
I want her to succeed.
For many reasons, I believe that she will not.
The battle is worth fighting, anyway.
The nation is corrupt. Jackie Chan speaks the truth. I hate that he states it, but it is a fact of our lives.
That is one reason I support Palin. She was the most effective at fighting the corruption, wherever it occurred.
Until we drain the swamp, the disease will spread.
This case will never succeed when the swamp remains.
Jackie Chan said something about ObaMao’s corruption?
AMEN!
and You have no idea how humongous the Corruption and Decay really is!!!!!!!
“How can we further serve and submit to you, our Master and our King.”
Folks, please understand what “conference” means in the context of SCOTUS. “Conference” means a bunch of law clerks sitting around a table piled sky high with appeals to SCOTUS. Hundreds, literally hundreds sitting on that table. They are the ones that made it to the first cut. Somewhere in there is Orly’s case. Now the law clerks start the process of culling. AT BEST, may be 10 or so get accepted where they will actually “go to trial”. The rest? Rejected. She’s been rejected before and you can count on them to do it again.
The judiciary will only cooperate if there are huge, loud, ugly crowds outside their doors demanding justice.
Folks, please understand what “conference” means in the context of SCOTUS. “Conference” means a bunch of law clerks sitting around a table piled sky high with appeals to SCOTUS. Hundreds, literally hundreds sitting on that table. They are the ones that made it to the first cut. Somewhere in there is Orly’s case. Now the law clerks start the process of culling. AT BEST, may be 10 or so get accepted where they will actually “go to trial”. The rest? Rejected. She’s been rejected before and you can count on them to do it again.
The judiciary will only cooperate if there are huge, loud, ugly crowds outside their doors demanding justice.
However, I would counsel to anyone reading this, we can still make the effort to pressure SCOTUS to hear her case. Letters, email, twitter, facebook, youtube videos, faxes to SCOTUS, Congress, even the White House as well as other parties. Aggressive, sustained and in your face. We have been polite for nearly 5 years. Time’s up.
Taitz is probably a paid saboteur!!
It is theorized that the '80' on 0bama's SSC is '2008' cut in half and turned upside down (A 1980 date stamp forged from a date stamp from 2008).
Title:
Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
v.
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed: December 13, 2012
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S207078)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent:
Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555
P. O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
“The judiciary will only cooperate if there are huge, loud, ugly crowds outside their doors demanding justice”.....I’m all ears......how do we get organized and demand justice? the day leading up to it @ State Capital Buildings? They have us all out here, widely dispersed......
This is a lawsuit in which Orly sued Deborah Bowen, the California Secretary of State, to enjoin her from certifying California's election results. She did NOT sue Obama or any other federal official in this case. California's votes have already been certified and Congress has accepted the electoral vote count. So it is legally impossible for the Supreme Court to now grant Orly any of what she is asking for in this case.
what relief is she asking for?
Her application for a stay to the Supreme Court asks the Court to stay the certification of California's votes (which has already happened), stay the Congress from certifying the electoral votes (which has also already happened, and didn't involve Bowen anyway) and stay Obama's inauguration (which is likewise not something Debra Bowen would have the power to do even if SCOTUS ordered her to do it). Bowen is the only defendant in this case, so Orly's motion is even more preposterous than her usual filings; it would be like me suing you for a judgment that Orly Taitz owes me a million dollars. Courts can issue orders only to the parties to the case.
I think this is the original filing your are referring.
From Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_C._Noonan
Mr. Noonan ran for the Office of President of the United States in 2012 and won the American Independent Party’s primary in California.
In January of 2012 Mr. Noonan filed suit with 6 other electors in California to prevent the Secretary of State, Debra Bowen from placing Mr. Barack Obama on the California Primary Ballot. Mr. Noonan and the other petitioners claimed that Mr. Obama had not proved that he was a U.S. Citizen. The case was dismissed by Judge Micheal P. Kenny of the Sacramento Superior Court and was appealed in August of 2012.
*********
More at the following article about her exchanges with the Judge in Sacramento.
http://www.sacbee.com/2013/01/03/5091099/orly-taitzs-obama-birther-claims.html
Who is Harrison J. Bounel?
The Sacramento case is a different one, filed in federal court (and still at the trial court level). The SCOTUS motion that is the subject of this thread is an attempt to appeal from a California state-court suit against Bowen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.