Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Video: NRA's 'Stand and Fight,' targets Malia and Sasha Obama (Uh, no it doesn't)
Digital Journal ^ | January 16, 2013 | JohnThomas Didymus

Posted on 01/17/2013 12:00:10 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: muawiyah

The ad criticized Obama, not his kids.


41 posted on 01/17/2013 4:27:44 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bob

But we all know how the Nazi’s minds work. Distract from the bigger issue by focusing on the smaller issue and kicking up a big ruckus. That’s just how they roll...


42 posted on 01/17/2013 4:29:21 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: tinamina
The 11 armed guards isn't entirely accurate.

Between five and seven are listed as police officers and under DC law can be armed. The other "security" personnel can't be, at least under DC law.

Of course, Sidwell is split between two campuses with just on in DC and it's unclear the distribution of the 11, plus they're hiring another 'police office' position.

From even the Left's gun-grabber slanted "fact checking" I'd assume, yes, there's at least one armed guard at Sidwell campuses around the clock.

On that note, it is hypocrisy to suggest other school campuses should be gun free zone because they don't have the political elites children and grandchildren. Obama was dismissive of the suggestion and claimed Americans were "skeptical" of the idea.

Since we already know he wants to improve plans for first responders and make administrators aware of ways to handle gunmen, it doesn't make sense not to push to have at least one armed officer per campus if he's serious. That puts at least one armed first responder there immediately.

43 posted on 01/17/2013 4:51:43 AM PST by newzjunkey (bah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Is YOUR child more important than Obama’ kids? Are OBAMA’S kids more important than YOUR kids? But Obama’s kids, because of his position are threatened (Krauthammer). I guess other children, like those killed at Sandy Hook were not threatened, just killed. The NRA deftly points out this hypocrisy.


44 posted on 01/17/2013 5:30:16 AM PST by ThePatriotsFlag (...and to the Republic for which it STOOD...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperjc

I think the hypocrisy of this regime needs to be pointed out and attacked on every issue at every opportunity, including this one. I believe one of the biggest problems the GOP has had in DC the past 4 years is that they have avoided doing so, for whatever reasons, and have ceded all issues to the ‘rats. I like that somebody has finally done it, maybe it will break the ice.


45 posted on 01/17/2013 5:52:48 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Yep. If the Kenyan and his minions thought this ad was hurting the NRA image he would not say a thing.


46 posted on 01/17/2013 5:59:40 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

47 posted on 01/17/2013 6:03:08 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chopperjc

You sound defeatists - the NRA ad hit a big nerve by stating the truth of the elitist hypocrisy of Obama. Being polite doesn’t get our side any brownie points. We need more hard-hitting, truthful ads and more “You Lie!” moments if we really intend to fight. Else, all we’re doing is biding our time before total surender.


48 posted on 01/17/2013 6:12:39 AM PST by trebb (Allies no longer trust us. Enemies no longer fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Interesting that the libtards don’t get the central theme behind the ad, namely that armed security personnel are seen as a viable deterrent to those seeking to harm the pResident’s children. If that’s the case, then why is that solution any less viable for anyone else’s children?
49 posted on 01/17/2013 6:14:20 AM PST by Common Sense 101 (Hey libs... If your theories fly in the face of reality, it's not reality that's wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

01/16/13
Weapon Makers See Danger in Cooperating Over Safety

Gun makers see a danger in working with the government that can be summed up in one name: Smith & Wesson.

BY Gary Fields

Ben Kesling and James R. Hagerty contributed to this article.

The article is only available to subscribers.

In summary the writer speaks to the fact that a few gun makers have cooperated with the government and have been basically bankrupted when gun owners chose to no longer do business with them.

Here are a couple of quotes from the article:

“Led by gun-rights groups, dealers stopped carrying Smith & Wessons products, and buyers melted away. the company was eventually sold for a fraction of what Tomkins initially paid.

“If you think you can buy your peace with your enemy you are sadly mistaken and you will suffer a severe backlash from the consumer, one senior industry executive said.”

http://online.wsj.com/search/search_center.html?KEYWORDS=GARY+FIELDS&ARTICLESEARCHQUERY_PARSER=bylineAND


50 posted on 01/17/2013 6:36:28 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion; Bullish; All

Thanks for the ping; posts.

Repugnant and cowardly BUMP!


51 posted on 01/17/2013 7:05:07 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Well-stated, DesertRhino.

TREASON - in real-time, pre-meditated, in-your-face, unquestioned, abetted, unchecked, continuous, ongoing...


52 posted on 01/17/2013 7:10:01 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It would be highly entertaining to compile a list of known anti-gun Washington types whose kids also attend that school. Not very easy, because that information if often kept from public view, but not impossible.


53 posted on 01/17/2013 7:59:44 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

1.) David Gregory, NBC News (2.)Joe Biden’s grandkids (3.)Lissa Muscatine, Hillary Clinton speechwriter (4.) Mark Penn, the former Clinton chief strategist (5.)Mandy Grunwald, the Hillary ad maker (6.) Capricia Marshall, the senior adviser to Hillary (7.) Beth Dozoretz, the prolific Clinton fundraiser (8.) Patti Solis Doyle, Obama and Clinton aide (9.) George Stephanopoulos, ABC News (10.) Claire Shipman, ABC News (11.) Terry Moran, ABC News (12.) Howard Fineman, Newsweek (13.) Jay Carney, White House Press Secretary (14.) Katty Kay, BBC (15.) Monica Langley of the Wall Street Journal (16.) Adam Liptak, New York Times (17.) E.J. Dionne, The Washington Post (18.) Pulitzer Prize winner Bob Woodward, The Washington Post (19.) Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury, etc., etc...


54 posted on 01/17/2013 8:24:38 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

An exclusive school provides exclusive protection
http://www.examiner.com/article/an-exclusive-school-provides-exclusive-protection


55 posted on 01/17/2013 8:27:52 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: chopperjc

“Better look at the polls again. 60 percent ban assault weapons”

Push poll results. When asked in a more straight forward manner, the support for further gun control legislation is at around 4%.

“and no I don’t know what an assault weapon is either.”

That’s pretty clear. I doubt you know anything about any kind of gun.

“85 percent want background checks.”

More parroting of Obama’s lies.

“This seems like a lot more than just the far left.”

Sure, it even includes some gullible useful idiots that post on FR. Why are you on this site? It is pretty clear that you aren’t interested in truths or learning.


56 posted on 01/17/2013 10:13:56 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bob

No more mr nice guy. enough mamby pamby stuff. I’m not beyond suggesting his own kids are rentals that he will return at the end of his presententcy.


57 posted on 01/17/2013 10:55:25 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

*tagline*


58 posted on 01/17/2013 11:38:26 AM PST by Bullish (This pretend president is leaving one hell of a poop stain on our Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Thanks for the info!


59 posted on 01/18/2013 12:45:30 AM PST by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
Obama will use any means to promote his goals, yet yells foul when others do it.

 


60 posted on 01/19/2013 12:22:30 PM PST by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson