Skip to comments.People Control, the First Amendment and Article V
Posted on 01/24/2013 1:31:08 PM PST by DanMiller
The First Amendment provides,
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. (Emphasis added.)As the free exercise of religion comes to be considered old fashioned, irrelevant to daily life and to be opposed "progressively" -- and as political correctness becomes an increasingly common, "modern" and often successful opponent of free speech -- the bright colors of the First Amendment fade into muted pastels through "progressive" executive and legislative action and through judicial interpretation. Perhaps the American Flag will eventually be redesigned with pale grayish stars on a field of light blue, muted pink and gray stripes.
(Excerpt) Read more at danmillerinpanama.wordpress.com ...
Should it be requested that I re-post the entire piece here, I will be happy to do so.
Yes, you should post the whole piece here.
We do not exist to provide your blog with hits.
I seem to recall one of your earlier comments complaining about wasting FR bandwidth by posting entire articles.
Negative, that hasn't ever been one of my issues.
Now post your content if you wish.
I will be happy to do so, as I have with many other articles, if someone who does not appear to have a one track mind devoid of interest in substance requests it.
Ah. So will you stop farming FR for hits only if someone of whom
you approve requests that you do so. Gotcha. Makes perfect sense.
But times are tough and a penny-per-click along with Google-Ads
might buy you some noodles and a hooker and perhaps a bit of
meth if enough suckers click on you blog. Click away, suckers!
Just a friendly question, so please don't take offense: Did you work hard at learning to write discourteously, or did it just come naturally?
Discourteous on my part?
Am I the one directing FReepers offsite to feed my most base needs?
No, not I.
Now post your little writings and stop trying to trick people into visiting your blog.
It costs nothing to click your link.
I hope you get as many hits as you want.
Most Freepers don’t assume that all posts at this site require their criticism.
Didn’t want to read the article, but I went there so you would get the hit...LMAO
So you not only agree with but ACTIVELY ENABLE blogpimps to use Free Republic as a free advertising platform?
Bully for you, that's certainly an admirable stance.
I appreciate your visit and hope that if you haven't already done so you will have an opportunity to read the article.
Are you suggesting that this person has only posted in order to get some hits?
Are you implying that the poster is just a stinking blogpimp?
No, I was implying you were a one trick pony, with all due respect.
“So you not only agree with but ACTIVELY ENABLE blogpimps to use Free Republic as a free advertising platform?
Bully for you, that’s certainly an admirable stance. “
No, I just don’t like “hall monitor” types.
So if someone displays bad behavior in public, like cutting in line in front of you, you'll sheepishly allow it rather than be a "hall monitor" type.
“So if someone displays bad behavior in public, like cutting in line in front of you, you’ll sheepishly allow it rather than be a “hall monitor” type”
Down here, if someone is rude enough to cut in line, they’re rude enough to whip your ass in public....lol
So, unless you enjoy fighting, win or lose, I would shop at a different WalMart.
You can’t teach everyone manners. But, you can watch your own.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.