Skip to comments.Seattle Homemaker Fined $13,000 For Doing Background Check On Obama
Posted on 01/28/2013 11:33:35 AM PST by ethical
On January 10, 2013 the Washington State Supreme Court fined Linda Jordan almost $13,000 because she legally challenged Barack Obama's use of forged identity documents: A fake birth certificate and phony Social Security Number.
Jordan wanted the original records to be produced for comparison. Why did Jordan want to see Obamas real ID?
The Maricopa County Sheriff Department has presented credible evidence that the birth certificate Barack Obama posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 was forged. (Maricopa County Sheriff Department 602.876.1801) Jordans own research confirmed that Hawaii law requires signatures on birth certificates to be in permanent ink. The signature of Obamas mother, on his purported 1961 birth certificate, is partly ink and partly a computer created signature. This compilation means the signature was forged. Ohio Private Investigator Susan Daniels has confirmed that the Social Security Number Obama is using was previously issued to someone else. SSNs are NEVER re-issued.
Obama used this fake ID to prove he was eligible to be President. It got him on the ballot and into the White House. This is fraud in the least, treason at worst.
I filed the lawsuit because I fear for Americas future. A serious crime has been committed right in front of us and federal agents turned a blind eye to it. There is substantial evidence that Barack Obama is using fraudulent identity documents. The court ignored this evidence and sanctioned me with almost $13,000 in fines for exercising my right to request an evidentiary hearing. They labeled my concerns "frivolous". Surely Americans have the right to confirm if Obama used fake ID to gain access to the White House. Linda Jordan
At last!!!!!!! Someone dared to check him out!
Now, a question for all:
Last Saturday someone forwarded to me a photocopy of BHO’s student ID from Columbia with his photo on it. On the ID it said “foreign student”.
Does anyone know if this a real one or a fake one being passed around on the internet?
This will be sure to tick off a lot of alleged freepers today....
“NO, discuss anything BUT the birth certificate” the Hussein Head faux conservatives love to shout.
Put up an Internet link to Obama’s ‘foreign student’ ID.
so Herr Leader wanted to have the advantages of registering as a foreign student and then morph into a citizen when it suited him. that’s why his college records must stay undercover. im shocked I tell you, shocked!
Snopes (http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/studentid.asp) claims that the digital type of photo ID was not introduced at Columbia until 1996, well after the time that Obama would have been there.
Makes some sense. Bar codes were still rather rare in 1981.
This is pure thuggery by the judiciary. They did the same thing to Leo Donofrio. He vowed not to practice law again
(Orly Taitz deserved the sanctions she received for her repeated waste of the court’s time with her incompetence and attention-whore antics.)
This woman has more patriotism and cajones than the entire GOP.
Unfortunately I am not adept at copying and pasting something from FB over here to FR. Here’s what it looks like best as I can describe it:
IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
81 PHOTO ID HERE
(print is in purple)
” Bar codes were still rather rare in 1981.”
Not really, I owned a supermarket with register scanners in
1981. All grocery products had bar codes then.
Probably is a fake because in 1981 I believe Barry was Occidental at that time.
Background checks on ALL gun buyers, but a check on MorroccoBomber...? TO THE HIGH TOWER, WITH HER...!
And here’s something else:
Most dictators have prominent enemies; parties, poets, artists, film-makers, rebel commanders....
The really CREEPY dictators have enemies who are plumbers, housewives....GayMuzzie has no style at all.
Arrogant Communist Tyrant Hussein Obama Second Reich Information File.
A persistent PING for TRUTH!
C A Jones is a Homebuilder if you would take the time to do a google search. Not sure why that is relevant... ;)
No it wouldn't. Since the 1st Amendment was itself amended (by popular vote & lack of media/congressional/judicial attention) to exclude any questioning of Barry Seotoro.