Seattle Homemaker Fined $13,000 For Doing Background Check On Obama

January 28, 2013 | Linda Jordan

[publius911]

No it wouldn't. Since the 1st Amendment was itself amended (by popular vote & lack of media/congressional/judicial attention) to exclude any questioning of Barry Seotoro.

Let's not get silly here.

No part of the Bill of Rights (which themselves are Amendments) or any part of the original ratified Constitution can be amended by Executive Order.

[butterdezillion]

Thanks for the link to that decision. I would like this prick of a judge to tell me how the Constitution gives the responsibility for Congress to determine eligibility of a President elect in the instance where there are no legally-determined birth facts and HI state law says that the birth record that’s been presented must have its probative (legal evidentiary) value determined when it is presented as evidence to a JUDICIAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIAL OR BODY. Congress is legislative; there is no way it can lawfully determine the probative value of Obama’s non-valid Hawaii birth certificate. How, then, could Congress resolve this eligibility issue, since he specifically claims that the Constitution does not allow the courts to deal with Presidential eligibility.

(And how the HECK does he get away with blowing off the 20th Amendment, which says that a President elect (who can’t even be a President elect until Congress is all done with what the Constitution allows them to do with Presidential elections) can still fail to qualify before Jan. 20th? Who has the power to act on Presidential qualification once Congress has done their part - if not the courts? Sheesh. This guy is a MORON!)

Furthermore, the Congressional Research Service rightly noted in its advisory opinions to members of Congress that Presidential elections are run by the STATES according to the Constitution. That is the reason that Congress has ducked out of doing anything on this issue for the past 4 years. This judge contradicts the CRS, so maybe he should give his reasons as to why the CRS is just a bunch of internet “flakes”.

Furthermore, this judge should be sued for libel, presuming to say that Jordan filed this lawsuit just to add to the internet “noise”.

[publius911]

unless she can show specific harm done to her personally and directly, she has no standing to file the suit.

Excuse me?
Abuse of power under color of authority is the short version.
Fraud.
Obamacare.
A neverending list of abuses, usurpations and fraudulent taxes and illegal laws(not one cent more in taxes.)

The fact that Congress and state governments fail to challenge something does not make it Constitutional.
Legal and Constitutional are not interchangeable.

Every working, non governmental working American has standing.

I fail to find, in that article, the specific reason for the fine. When a legal matter is brought before a court, and it lacks standing, it is merely rejected. If fines were legal, no legal procedures would ever proceed, given large enough fines.

Justice has a blindfold and scales, but no pockets.

[Revolting cat!]

Cojones. Cajones means nothing in Spanish or in English.

Uh, Michael Corleone is Eyetalian!

[scott7278]

I would say fake (even though I believe it’s accurate). The picture is too nice for a quick-shot ID card.

I also believe that things like this are being released by the Administration itself, so that they can be discredited later on.

[rxsid]

You mean, you didn't see my implied sarcasm tag there?

Geez, talk about silly.

[kabumpo]

Actually, Cajones does mean something in Spanish. Un cajon is a wooden box, often used as a percussion instrument.

[Sgt_Schultze]

Both the bar codes read the same number W698002721

It looks to be as original as obiOne's layered birth certificate.

[DrDude]

I went to a much smaller school than Columbia. We had the digital ID with Bar Code by 1981. Not sure when it started.

[kabumpo]

And also a percussion instrument used in flamenco and in Afro Caribbean music.

[butterdezillion]

If the law she cites gives her standing to file a lawsuit, then how can it be that the judiciary lacks jurisdiction? If the law allows lawsuits it must allow the judiciary to have jurisdiction. Is this judge claiming that the law is unconstitutional because it doesn’t specifically exempt Presidential eligibility lawsuits?

And if that is what he is claiming, then why should Jordan have to pay $13,000 for the state’s passage of an unconstitutional law?

And BTW, how can he rule on a law’s constitutionality if that is not being challenged?

[kabumpo]

And also a percussion instrument used in flamenco and in Afro Caribbean music.

[kabumpo]

And also a percussion instrument used in flamenco and in Afro Caribbean music.

[kabumpo]

And also a percussion instrument used in flamenco and in Afro Caribbean music.

[kabumpo]

And also a percussion instrument used in flamenco and in Afro Caribbean music.

[kabumpo]

And also a percussion instrument used in flamenco and in Afro Caribbean music.

[Revolting cat!]

Three different kinds of percussion instruments? Wow!

[moose07]

It looks to be as original as obiOne's layered birth certificate.
Chuckle.

The photo of obozo is too sharp with respects to the other card and its own surroundings.
Fake ,funny but fake.

[JewishRighter]

I still have my Columbia ID from 1982. The one posted on Snopes doesn’t look anything like it.

[Smokin' Joe]

She has been fined because of the lack of Obama’s bona fides. I would think that would give her standing to pursue the issue in a higher court. The “frivolous” claim made by the judge could be either confirmed or refuted if the evidence is provided by the defense—to date, no credible evidence has.