Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/03/2013 10:58:43 AM PST by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: John Semmens
NJ Senator Mounts His Own Defense

...don't tell me his defense lawyer is from the Dominican too

2 posted on 02/03/2013 11:01:12 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Federal sex tourism laws prohibit the traveling to a foreign country to have sex with someone under 18 regardless of the laws of that country or even regardless of the age of consent in various US states.

Wonder when they will impose similar laws to prosecute those heading to Amsterdam or Vancouver to smoke the weed.


3 posted on 02/03/2013 11:04:10 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Remember how the liberal media got all excited with reports about Rush Limbaugh’s activities in the Bahamas?

But like Menendez, excused Bill Clinton’s toking outside the US?


4 posted on 02/03/2013 11:04:39 AM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
He doesn't need a defense. He's a DEMOCRAP- (Harrison Williams, Torch Torricelli, McGreevey, Spitzer, Weiner, Stained Blue Dress President, Vast Right Wing conspiracy Secretary of State, etc.)
6 posted on 02/03/2013 11:05:59 AM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
My breech of a piece in a foreign country clearly fits within this privilege.”

Thanks John snicker*

8 posted on 02/03/2013 11:08:38 AM PST by BipolarBob (Happy Hunger Games! May the odds be ever in your favor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

Menendez’ll mount just about anything it seems.


9 posted on 02/03/2013 11:10:40 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

You have to admit, sometimes it’s difficult to tell the difference between satire and actual statements by Menendez in his own defense.


10 posted on 02/03/2013 11:16:24 AM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

I read it through and did NOT think “Semmens”, then eventually as always happens with your semi-satire,
a number of respondents seemed to be taking it seriously,
and I instinctively checked back to the header.
I almost WISH Menendez would mount this kind of defense,
which would be equivalent of taking the Clinton Defense
several steps further, 15 years after Monica.
But Clinton knew he could get away with it because his personal appeal and the “secret knowledge” tucked way back in the minds of the American electorate that his marriage to Hillary was perenially “troubled”, softened their ultimate judgement of him.More sympathy flowed to both him and Hillary than any two political sleazeballs could ever have
deserved, which led me to believe that the entire “prosecution” of Clinton was ill-advised and counterproductive.
This narrative line and the words you put in Menendez’s mouth pretty much capture the rationale they’d LIKE to present to the public, and what they actually believe.
Menendez, however, is much more expendable than Clinton to
the Democratic Party, so I think ultimately he may not skate on this.It’s hard to predict the ultimate disposition of these charges, but they hang over the other “less serious” ones exactly like Clinton’s. What Clinton did in the Oval Office with Monica is equal to what Menendez did in the DR
with teen-aged prostitutes. At the core of it all is the Dem
sense of “entitlement”—— during the period he was using young prostitutes in DR,Menendez “crusaded” against prostitution in Cuba, just as Clinton pretended to be THE
defender of “women’s rights” against his Philistine opponents, Ken Starr and the Republicans. Dems don’t see any
hypocrisy in this: from Clinton to Ted Kennedy to Eliot Spitzer to Menendez (with countless examples in between)
they are “entitled” to do what they will with specific girls and young women BECAUSE they’ve wrapped themselves in the mantle of crusading for “ALL” women on the political stage.


12 posted on 02/03/2013 11:34:02 AM PST by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

“Piece for our time” (waving paper)


13 posted on 02/03/2013 11:57:51 AM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens

The turd will get away with it because there will be no witnesses. Just as the Benghazi survivors have been well secreted to avoid testifying. Do you think these RATS were born yesterday? They are masters of deceit.


14 posted on 02/03/2013 1:31:26 PM PST by kenmcg (scapegoat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson