Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: GGpaX4DumpedTea

In addition to the U.S. Constitution saying military force can be used against U.S. Citizens, it also says the right to keep and bear arms is not to be infringed. Nonetheless a succession of Federal Administrations, Congresses, and members of the Supreme court of the United States have abrogated the Constitution and Second Amendment. They could have acted in a Constitutional manner to perfect the Second amendment or repeal the Seond amendmeent altogether, but they did not knowing full well they could not garner the voted in congress and the state legislatures to ratify such a measure. instead, they subverted the Second Amendment, the Constitution, and the commonlaw rights of self defense extant since time immemorial.

The question is what you and other will do about it, pursue a Marxist fantasy argument or grapple with reality without destroying the original purpose of the military in a free society?


15 posted on 02/05/2013 9:55:23 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyX

And by the way, I read the memo, the Obama administration couldn’t directly pinpoint cite (you know, where it says it’s ok) to the Constitution the ability to use military force against US citizens, because it’s not there. If it was, it wouldn’t take 16 pages to do so.


18 posted on 02/05/2013 10:50:17 PM PST by rangerwife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyX

And by the way, I read the memo, the Obama administration couldn’t directly pinpoint cite (you know, where it says it’s ok) to the Constitution the ability to use military force against US citizens, because it’s not there. If it was, it wouldn’t take 16 pages to do so.


19 posted on 02/05/2013 10:50:22 PM PST by rangerwife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyX

And by the way, I read the memo, the Obama administration couldn’t directly pinpoint cite (you know, where it says it’s ok) to the Constitution the ability to use military force against US citizens, because it’s not there. If it was, it wouldn’t take 16 pages to do so.


20 posted on 02/05/2013 10:50:30 PM PST by rangerwife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyX

And by the way, I read the memo, the Obama administration couldn’t directly pinpoint cite (you know, where it says it’s ok) to the Constitution the ability to use military force against US citizens, because it’s not there. If it was, it wouldn’t take 16 pages to do so.


21 posted on 02/05/2013 10:50:42 PM PST by rangerwife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: WhiskeyX

Check out this link...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2986229/posts?page=7
This thread likely will not tolerate your Unconstitutional venom in support of the Obama/Holder agenda to kill whomever the hell they please.


43 posted on 02/07/2013 3:59:14 PM PST by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson