Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sibley Injects Stuxnet-Like Motion Challenging Obama's Eligibility
Montgomery Blair Sibley ^ | 02/06/2013 | M.B. Sibley

Posted on 02/08/2013 7:19:41 AM PST by TexasVoter

Washington D.C. – A new front on the legal battle to establish that Barack Hussein Obama, II, is ineligible to be President was opened today by Montgomery Blair Sibley.

To date, no federal court has taken up the merits of Obama's eligibility relying instead on the dubious legal doctrine of “standing” to dismiss every lawsuit. Accordingly, Sibley has released his Stuxnet-like Motion to Dismiss Indictment into the federal prison system. The Motion makes the simple argument that: (i) no federal law is valid under Article I, § 7, cl. 2, of the Constitution unless it is presented to the President, (ii) Obama is not a legitimate President and thus (iii) his signing of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 (“FERA”) is void. Accordingly, every person charge and/or convicted under FERA is entitled to be released.

The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees: “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall . . . have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.” Thus the Motion demands federal subpoenas for Obama’s: (i) certificates of live birth, (ii) college applications from Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School, (iii) U.S. Passport application, (iv) Social Security application and (v) Selective Service registration information – documents Obama has refused to reveal despite repeated requests.

(Excerpt) Read more at montgomeryblairsibley.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: naturalborncitizen; obama
I like this Sibley guy. Good fortune to you, sir!
1 posted on 02/08/2013 7:19:48 AM PST by TexasVoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

This will go exactly nowhere. The court will simply rule that the Obama is the presumptive President by virtue of his swearing in, and that questions of eligibility are untimely.


2 posted on 02/08/2013 7:23:44 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

3 posted on 02/08/2013 7:27:22 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Here once the embattled farmers stood... And fired the shot heard round the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

I like this. Personnally, Everything and anything that can be thrown at Obama/Osama should be down NOW. Birther, treason, murder, F&F, Benghazi, Drones, etc... Pretty soon there will be nothing left to challenge. O/O should have to provide basic ID like everyone else.


4 posted on 02/08/2013 7:27:30 AM PST by DrDude (Governor of the 57th State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Cough cough...drone strike.


5 posted on 02/08/2013 7:27:44 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (I own a weapon to protect my family from those wanting to take that weapon away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

Sibley has sent the Motion to prisoners convicted under FERA and their defense attorneys and
expects his Motion to be filed in dozens of FERA cases by them in the near future. Sibley said:
“Like the Stuxnet computer virus, my Motion will circulate among the prison and population and
criminal defense bar both of which are very adept at bringing legal pleadings to Court. Once the
Motion is properly presented, the Courts will be forced to deal with the merits of Obama’s
legitimacy. The doctrine of ‘standing’ will no longer be a barrier to adjudication. My Motion
forces the Courts to make the choice of issuing the requested subpoenas – thereby finally settling
the issue of Obama’s eligibility to be President – or affirming that the Sixth Amendment has
been repealed by Judicial fiat because it threatens the status quo. Either way, we will know
where we stand as a People and whether it is time to convene a Constitutional Convention to
re-assert our fundamental rights in a federal judicial system which has evolved to ignore those
sacred rights when they challenge the ruling class.”
- E n d


6 posted on 02/08/2013 7:34:18 AM PST by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

Thanks for posting. I read his bio at the site. . . interesting character.

Another link in case anyone has trouble with the .pdf file linked above (this article is posted at his blog site). . .

http://amoprobos.blogspot.com/


7 posted on 02/08/2013 7:41:00 AM PST by deks ("...the battle...liberty against the overreach of the federal government" Ken Cuccinelli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

Standing is an excuse for cowardice in the courts.


8 posted on 02/08/2013 7:56:23 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

I’m for the idea. Something like it was proposed years back as a way to get around the standing thing, as the prisoners have lost substantial money as a result of their jail time.

What I fear is that the judge like others before will say there is only circumstantial evidence on the internet that Obama is not qualified.

It is like a Catch 22 you need the court to get evidence but you need evidence to start the court moving.


9 posted on 02/08/2013 8:00:56 AM PST by Hang'emAll (If guns kill people do pencils make spelling errors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

I smell an untimly Brietbart event.


10 posted on 02/08/2013 8:01:45 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter
 photo white-house-2_zpscab8d62b.jpg
11 posted on 02/08/2013 8:03:30 AM PST by RetSignman ("A Republic if you can keep it"....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter
Who is Montgomery Blair Sibley you may ask.

About him in his own words

He defended the D.C. Madam

12 posted on 02/08/2013 8:05:27 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter; Absolutely Nobama; aragorn; Art in Idaho; Aurorales; autumnraine; azishot; ...
Constitutional Eligibility

13 posted on 02/08/2013 8:07:12 AM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasVoter

“What difference, at this point, does it make?”


14 posted on 02/08/2013 9:02:56 AM PST by golf lover (goingf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phockthis
Either way, we will know where we stand as a People

There is no People.

15 posted on 02/08/2013 9:07:45 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
As I read this, it's 9:10 A.M. in the morning, "POP CORN" and coffee don't mix.

But I love pop corn. :-) Only with real butter & salt.

Best comment on this thread.

16 posted on 02/08/2013 9:20:48 AM PST by Stanwood_Dave ("Testilying." Cop's don't lie, they just Testily{ing} as taught in their respected Police Academy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: golf lover

I would like nothing better than for the Left’s latest corrupt, Marxist race idol, to go down in the flames of treason against the constitution. That would be great for waking up those in power that they are not really untouchable as they go about their business of betraying the constitution and enlaving the American people to foreign and globalist interests.

Biden would be under our foot if they permitted him to become president. Since he ran on a corrupt ticket, there is a case to be made for his removal from office, too. I would call for GOP leaders who protected the lie to be punished along with Obama and the DNC officials who abbeted in the crime.

It would put the fear of God in the ‘smart’ and corrupt elitists for a change. Lord knows, they have been terrorizing the American people with their anti-constitutional treason and foreign sympathy for long enough.
It would be better than a violent revolution to stop them.


17 posted on 02/08/2013 9:34:33 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hang'emAll
What I fear is that the judge like others before will say there is only circumstantial evidence on the internet that Obama is not qualified.

That is a valid concern. The response ought to be "the fact there is no credible evidence he is qualified is not merely a political issue but represents a significant failure of law ".

Of course, the final outcome is in doubt so long as we have politicians who are quite willing to ignore the law for political purposes.

18 posted on 02/08/2013 11:27:34 AM PST by frog in a pot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

Kudos, SaraJohnson; well said.


19 posted on 02/08/2013 1:03:27 PM PST by TexasVoter (No Constitution? No Union!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DrDude

If this gets to a federal judge with an ounce of integrity, Obama is toast.

No way in hell could I let a man rot in jail for breaking the foul laws of an usurped presidency. The stench would never rinse clean from the soul.


20 posted on 02/08/2013 5:33:11 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: phockthis

I like Sibley. That’s a nicely crafted statement right there.


21 posted on 02/08/2013 5:50:33 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: phockthis
Res ipsa loquitur. Ipso facto. Post hoc, propter hoc. Amicus curiae. Quod erat demonstratum. Salus publicae, prima lex. Gallia omnis in tres partes divisa est. Ex parte. Pro se. In propria persona. Qui custodet custodes? Hoc est punctum quod inter gentes ferro et ignis dividitur. Ad litem. Habeas corpus. Mamma frickin' mia.

Have we not had enough circling about these legal Robin Hood's barns? The courts, may the gods damn them, certainly have. They are having NONE of it. Those prisoners languishing in durance vile as a result of FERA, shall long there remain.

The ruling piece of legal dog-latin? Res judicata. Which means "other courts have looked at this. They have decided, and we all (surprise surprise) agree." So Attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley (quel beau nom historique!) Foxtrot Oscar.

There is no Santa Claus. But the Easter Bunny is coming to tell all adults, "The Law, Fairness, and Logic can tend to be mutually exclusive matters."

22 posted on 02/09/2013 8:55:21 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (The Obama Molecule: Teflon binds with Melanin = No Criminal Charges Stick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson