Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

I like this Sibley guy. Good fortune to you, sir!
1 posted on 02/08/2013 7:19:48 AM PST by TexasVoter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TexasVoter

This will go exactly nowhere. The court will simply rule that the Obama is the presumptive President by virtue of his swearing in, and that questions of eligibility are untimely.


2 posted on 02/08/2013 7:23:44 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

3 posted on 02/08/2013 7:27:22 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Here once the embattled farmers stood... And fired the shot heard round the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

I like this. Personnally, Everything and anything that can be thrown at Obama/Osama should be down NOW. Birther, treason, murder, F&F, Benghazi, Drones, etc... Pretty soon there will be nothing left to challenge. O/O should have to provide basic ID like everyone else.


4 posted on 02/08/2013 7:27:30 AM PST by DrDude (Governor of the 57th State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

Sibley has sent the Motion to prisoners convicted under FERA and their defense attorneys and
expects his Motion to be filed in dozens of FERA cases by them in the near future. Sibley said:
“Like the Stuxnet computer virus, my Motion will circulate among the prison and population and
criminal defense bar both of which are very adept at bringing legal pleadings to Court. Once the
Motion is properly presented, the Courts will be forced to deal with the merits of Obama’s
legitimacy. The doctrine of ‘standing’ will no longer be a barrier to adjudication. My Motion
forces the Courts to make the choice of issuing the requested subpoenas – thereby finally settling
the issue of Obama’s eligibility to be President – or affirming that the Sixth Amendment has
been repealed by Judicial fiat because it threatens the status quo. Either way, we will know
where we stand as a People and whether it is time to convene a Constitutional Convention to
re-assert our fundamental rights in a federal judicial system which has evolved to ignore those
sacred rights when they challenge the ruling class.”
- E n d


6 posted on 02/08/2013 7:34:18 AM PST by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

Thanks for posting. I read his bio at the site. . . interesting character.

Another link in case anyone has trouble with the .pdf file linked above (this article is posted at his blog site). . .

http://amoprobos.blogspot.com/


7 posted on 02/08/2013 7:41:00 AM PST by deks ("...the battle...liberty against the overreach of the federal government" Ken Cuccinelli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

Standing is an excuse for cowardice in the courts.


8 posted on 02/08/2013 7:56:23 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

I’m for the idea. Something like it was proposed years back as a way to get around the standing thing, as the prisoners have lost substantial money as a result of their jail time.

What I fear is that the judge like others before will say there is only circumstantial evidence on the internet that Obama is not qualified.

It is like a Catch 22 you need the court to get evidence but you need evidence to start the court moving.


9 posted on 02/08/2013 8:00:56 AM PST by Hang'emAll (If guns kill people do pencils make spelling errors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

I smell an untimly Brietbart event.


10 posted on 02/08/2013 8:01:45 AM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter
 photo white-house-2_zpscab8d62b.jpg
11 posted on 02/08/2013 8:03:30 AM PST by RetSignman ("A Republic if you can keep it"....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter
Who is Montgomery Blair Sibley you may ask.

About him in his own words

He defended the D.C. Madam

12 posted on 02/08/2013 8:05:27 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter; Absolutely Nobama; aragorn; Art in Idaho; Aurorales; autumnraine; azishot; ...
Constitutional Eligibility

13 posted on 02/08/2013 8:07:12 AM PST by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Don't enable tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TexasVoter

“What difference, at this point, does it make?”


14 posted on 02/08/2013 9:02:56 AM PST by golf lover (goingf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson