This will go exactly nowhere. The court will simply rule that the Obama is the presumptive President by virtue of his swearing in, and that questions of eligibility are untimely.
I like this. Personnally, Everything and anything that can be thrown at Obama/Osama should be down NOW. Birther, treason, murder, F&F, Benghazi, Drones, etc... Pretty soon there will be nothing left to challenge. O/O should have to provide basic ID like everyone else.
Sibley has sent the Motion to prisoners convicted under FERA and their defense attorneys and
expects his Motion to be filed in dozens of FERA cases by them in the near future. Sibley said:
Like the Stuxnet computer virus, my Motion will circulate among the prison and population and
criminal defense bar both of which are very adept at bringing legal pleadings to Court. Once the
Motion is properly presented, the Courts will be forced to deal with the merits of Obamas
legitimacy. The doctrine of standing will no longer be a barrier to adjudication. My Motion
forces the Courts to make the choice of issuing the requested subpoenas thereby finally settling
the issue of Obamas eligibility to be President or affirming that the Sixth Amendment has
been repealed by Judicial fiat because it threatens the status quo. Either way, we will know
where we stand as a People and whether it is time to convene a Constitutional Convention to
re-assert our fundamental rights in a federal judicial system which has evolved to ignore those
sacred rights when they challenge the ruling class.
- E n d
Thanks for posting. I read his bio at the site. . . interesting character.
Another link in case anyone has trouble with the .pdf file linked above (this article is posted at his blog site). . .
Standing is an excuse for cowardice in the courts.
I’m for the idea. Something like it was proposed years back as a way to get around the standing thing, as the prisoners have lost substantial money as a result of their jail time.
What I fear is that the judge like others before will say there is only circumstantial evidence on the internet that Obama is not qualified.
It is like a Catch 22 you need the court to get evidence but you need evidence to start the court moving.
I smell an untimly Brietbart event.
What difference, at this point, does it make?