I’m for the idea. Something like it was proposed years back as a way to get around the standing thing, as the prisoners have lost substantial money as a result of their jail time.
What I fear is that the judge like others before will say there is only circumstantial evidence on the internet that Obama is not qualified.
It is like a Catch 22 you need the court to get evidence but you need evidence to start the court moving.
That is a valid concern. The response ought to be "the fact there is no credible evidence he is qualified is not merely a political issue but represents a significant failure of law ".
Of course, the final outcome is in doubt so long as we have politicians who are quite willing to ignore the law for political purposes.