Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Right-to-Work States Gain Union Members While Other States Lose Hundreds of Thousands
Michigan Capitol Confidential ^ | 2/4/2013 | Tom Gantert

Posted on 02/08/2013 8:53:41 AM PST by MichCapCon

The 22 states that were right-to-work saw an increase in the number of union members from 2011 to 2012, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The right-to-work states had an overall increase of 39,000 union members while non-right-to-work states lost 390,000, a 3.4 percent decrease.

Indiana was not included in the analysis because it passed right-to-work legislation in 2012.

In the 22 right-to-work states, overall union membership increased from 2,813,000 to 2,852,000. Michigan saw its union membership drop from 671,000 to 629,000 and Indiana saw union membership fall from 302,000 to 246,000.

The latest BLS report casts doubt on the belief held by many pro-union groups that right-to-work laws automatically means a decline in union membership.

"If you do not believe labor is greatly compromised by right-to-work, you are seriously misinformed," United Food and Commercial Workers Local 876 President Roger Robinson wrote recently.

In a draft of a contract proposal that would not allow right-to-work for nine-years, union leadership of the Western Michigan University Chapter of the American Association of University Professors stated they anticipated a “significant” drop in membership if their members were given a choice to leave.

"Without a new USA (union security agreement), significant reduction in membership dues support is likely in the wake of RTW …" reads the memo.

Yet some right-to-work states have seen gradual increases in membership since 2000, according to the BLS.

Oklahoma, for example, passed right-to-work in 2001. In 2000, it had 96,000 union members. Slowly the number of union members in Oklahoma has grown to 115,000 in 2012.

F. Vincent Vernuccio, director of labor policy at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, said that inattentive unions will lose membership once right-to-work is offered.

"Unions will start to shape up or better unions will come in and take their place," he said.

In Michigan, many unions have sought to use heavy-handed retribution tactics against their members rather than woo them.

Michigan Education Association President Steve Cook said his union would use "any legal means at our disposal" to get at union members who want to leave the MEA.

The Berkley Education Association teachers' union has proposed a 9-year "clause that would not offer right-to-work to its members." Then the union spelled out in its proposal how it would go after members who wanted the option of leaving the union. The draft proposal stated that if deducting dues was to be deemed unlawful, the union member could be fired. And if it were unlawful for the union member to be fired, a clause in the contract would allow the union the right "to pursue any other lawful remedies."

University of Michigan Economist Don Grimes said that he doubted the data on union jobs was correct. He said the BLS stated that updated controls in measuring the data meant the number of 2012 union jobs "are not strictly comparable" to the 2011 union jobs.

The BLS however, stated, "These adjustments to the levels, however, should have had only negligible effects on union membership rates."

"Not certain how, but whenever you see some data that you don't believe, the data is probably wrong somehow," Grimes said. "Sometimes, even with government published data, you need to look at the fine print."

TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: biglabor; bluestation; migration; redstates; states; unions

1 posted on 02/08/2013 8:53:49 AM PST by MichCapCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Springman; Sioux-san; 70th Division; JPG; PGalt; DuncanWaring; taildragger; epluribus_2; Chuck54; ..
As long as we can gain free market based jobs.

If anyone wants to be added to the Michigan Cap Con ping list, let me know.
2 posted on 02/08/2013 9:00:19 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
"As long as we can gain free market based jobs."

That is the rub. The Federal Government and private enterprise are so intertwined through contracts, regulation, and the tax code that true free market based jobs are dwindling across the nation. The Feds themselves have become the defacto union for the country.

3 posted on 02/08/2013 9:27:29 AM PST by buckalfa (Tilting at Windmills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon
Right to Work requires unions to deliver a satisfactory product to their customers at an agreeable price, or they will lose those customers.

In this case the "customers" are the union rank and file members, and the "product" is a contract that is beneficial to the member.

The key element is that all sides enter into this voluntarily without duress, anything else is extortion.

4 posted on 02/08/2013 9:35:11 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichCapCon
Fine, as long as it's voluntary.
Competition is good, even for unions. Small is good too.
Unions have a role only as long as they represent the members and not primarily the Democrat-Communist-Organized_Crime complex.

If I was to start a union, one of the primary bylaws would be: Money from dues are never to be used for political contributions.

5 posted on 02/08/2013 10:11:01 AM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson