Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NM:Police harass legal buyers at Santa Fe Gun Turn In
Gun Watch ^ | 10 February, 2013 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 02/09/2013 6:31:19 PM PST by marktwain

On 9 February, 2013, the Santa Fe Police Department collected 224 guns turned in to it for Visa gift cards. The cards were worth $150 for handguns, $100 for long guns, and $200 for "high capacity or assault" weapons.

The police scared off a number of people who wished to offer more money than the police would give in prepaid visa cards.

What legal authority the police had to do this is unknown.

Another gun turn in will be held on the ninth of March.

Dean Weingarten


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; nm; santafe; secondamendment; turnin
These actions need to be challenged in court. If someone goes to the next event, please record it. I will be glad to write an article and publish it.
1 posted on 02/09/2013 6:31:31 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The government does not like competition


2 posted on 02/09/2013 6:35:50 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
On 9 February, 2013, the Santa Fe Police Department collected 224 guns turned in to it for Visa gift cards.

Maybe they can use the gift cards to buy better weapons.

3 posted on 02/09/2013 6:39:22 PM PST by Mark17 (California, where English is a foreign language)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
These turn in's where they give you some bucks for your old nasty firearms are probably advantageous to gunowners. They can use the money to purchase newer, safer firearms.

Some hills are worth dying on ~ some aren't. This one doesn't seem to be worth it.

4 posted on 02/09/2013 6:50:00 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Article: What legal authority the police had to do this is unknown.
marktwain: These actions need to be challenged in court.

Agreed. The State's Constitution says the following:

Art II, Sec. 6. [Right to bear arms.]
No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall be held to permit the carrying of concealed weapons. No municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms.

5 posted on 02/09/2013 6:50:20 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Some hills are worth dying on ~ some aren't. This one doesn't seem to be worth it.

I disagree with you here; the State's own Constitution specifically prohibits a municipality (ore county) from regulating "in any way" the right to keep and bear arms -- and the annotated constitution shows a good precedent for including sales in that 'regulation'.

The reason that this is important is because if the Constitution is so ignored it ceases to have any meaning whatsoever; see the federal government and the US Constitution for an example of this (esp. WRT the 4th, 5th, & 2nd).

6 posted on 02/09/2013 7:01:10 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
All of which is true, but the stories appear to involve primarily individuals doing a double-dare.

Interesting that so many people are uninterested in pursuing court challenges ~ maybe because the guns involved are less costly than a couple of hours of lawyer time.

That's the hill that's the problem ~ one suit against one cop ~ could easily bankrupt someone.

There were similar situations in Wisconsin and folks took a different course of action ~ first, they got the state law rewritten, then they went after the cops, but they did so with the backing of the major gun rights organizations.

Get your ducks lined up and then move.

7 posted on 02/09/2013 7:16:22 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Seattle had a similar gun buyback January 26th. However, private vendors turned it into a gun show complete with free donuts and signs that read, “Fast cash for your gun” and “Want more than a $100 gift card?” These private gun sales were an embarrassment to the anti-gun liberal Left even though they declared it an overwhelming success. The Seattle Police Department gave out more than 1,000 give cards of $100 or $200 (depending on the gun) before running out. Lucky for those wishing to get rid of a gun to have a willing private vendor there to give cash for an unwanted gun.

Seattle Mayor, Mike McGinn vowed that the next gun buyback will not have these private gun sales. His legal council has told him how he can do it. This is what a man has to do to be reelected in the next election. For the reasons why this is all self promotion for these ego ridden politicians and little of other use, read at the following link:

http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10881&page=95


8 posted on 02/09/2013 7:22:20 PM PST by jonrick46 (The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

New Mexico is a CCW state and holders can even defend themselves against anyone unlawfully infringing on their safety or life. I think these cops are on the wrong side and should think “carefully”. The Nuremburg trials did not accept orders as a defense.


9 posted on 02/09/2013 7:31:10 PM PST by MtnClimber (I did not vote for 0bama, someone else did that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

Different optics on both sides. The government dosn’t see this as commerce. To them it’s disarmament of potential hostiles (with parting gifts). To everyone else it’s reasonable exchange.


10 posted on 02/09/2013 7:33:05 PM PST by Ouchthatonehurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

Correct.

They have no constitutional authority to block this legal commerce.

New Mexico State CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION, and the Law.

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION
“No law shall abridge the right of the citizen to keep and bear arms
for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use
and for other lawful purposes, but nothing herein shall be held
to permit the carrying of concealed weapons. No municipality
or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to
keep and bear arms.” Article II, Section 6.
PURCHASE
No state permit is required to purchase a rifle, shotgun or
handgun. Residents of states contiguous to New Mexico may
purchase firearms in New Mexico. Residents of New Mexico
may purchase firearms in states contiguous to New Mexico.
POSSESSION
No state permit is required to possess a rifle, shotgun or
handgun.
It is unlawful for a person under 19 to possess or
transport a handgun, except when the person is: (1) attending
a hunter’s or handgun safety course; (2) engaged in target
shooting or in organized competition; (3) legal hunting or
trapping; (4) participating in or practicing for a performance
by a nonprofit organization formed under I.R.S. Code € 501(c)
(3); (5) traveling with an unloaded handgun to or from one of
the above activities; (6) on real property under the control of
the person’s parent, grandparent, or guardian and while under
their supervision.


11 posted on 02/09/2013 7:33:53 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

PURCHASE
No state permit is required to purchase a rifle, shotgun or
handgun. Residents of states contiguous to New Mexico may
purchase firearms in New Mexico. Residents of New Mexico
may purchase firearms in states contiguous to New Mexico


12 posted on 02/09/2013 7:38:12 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Just say “NO” to the notion of “Permesso”.


13 posted on 02/09/2013 7:39:57 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Get private body guards and lawyers. : )


14 posted on 02/09/2013 8:20:43 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain


recovering attorney

do not mess with Gentleman Jim Supica

he "wrote the book" on S&W



15 posted on 02/09/2013 9:00:57 PM PST by devolve ( -------- -- --It is not where Obama was born that is the problem - it is where he's living now--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

I just want to see the FFL that the police have to conduct these turn ins. According to the 1968 GCA, any such activity, must be licensed as it is a public event where a single entity is acting as an FFL by selling or buying firearms. On top of that, the event is advertised.

There is no exemptions for this for LE or other groups. So... Why isn’t ATF jamming their jack boots down on the necks of these people engaging in the business or buying or selling firearms without an FFL???


16 posted on 02/09/2013 9:23:27 PM PST by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Tyrants survive and prosper through intimidation. Those who refuse to allow it can defeat them. But it takes guts and planning!
Have a number of people FILM the police refusing the right of citizens to buy guns at these “turn in” events. Also, ASK police for their FFL license.
If no one does these tings, don’t complain when all of your rights are lost. You brought it on yourself.


17 posted on 02/10/2013 10:15:17 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226
According to the 1968 GCA, any such activity, must be licensed as it is a public event where a single entity is acting as an FFL by selling or buying firearms.

Really? That is quite interesting.

18 posted on 02/10/2013 1:32:05 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson