To: SWAMPSNIPER; Jonty30
Since video cameras would be the first element of its payload, a duck load would identify the person who shot it down. However, I've got to believe that those cameras aren't looking up. The lack of hemispherical situational awareness of the operator is my chief argument against them being allowed to operate above 500 ft AGL. $50-60 will get you a sacrificial RC helo that could try to land on top of the offending voyeur ("Peeping Tom" for those of you in Rio Lindo). Not that I would ever do such a destructive thing, of course. Merely speculating what could happen.
posted on 02/12/2013 4:31:19 AM PST
(If more sane people carried guns, fewer crazies would get off a second shot.)
How about a small acoustic drone that homes in on the sound of a small UAV and crashes into it, or drags a tough filament into its rotors?
posted on 02/12/2013 4:40:36 AM PST
by Travis McGee
Let’s go gor RC missiles - that will solve the problem.
posted on 02/12/2013 4:52:51 AM PST
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson