Skip to comments.Chris Dorner Cabin on Fire, Has Basement (and four other cabins)
Posted on 02/12/2013 6:26:28 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Media sources expressed confusion as to the status of Christopher Dorner, the former Los Angeles Police Department officer now accused of killing four people including two cops. Dorner was allegedly chased to a Big Bear Lake cabin after being spotted by authorities in the area, a chase that resulted in the death of one officer.
Now, as the cabin where "hundreds" of bullets were exchanged burns down, it is unclear whether Dorner is dead, alive, captured, or hiding out...
(Excerpt) Read more at policymic.com ...
Maybe the LAPD should just napalm the entire area. That’ll get him, for sure.
What, no B-52 Rolling Thunder??
What I’d like to know is, what’s the environmental impact of all this? The EPA should be holding the LAPD accountable for these increased carbon emissions and potentially for future soil erosion!
flipped to the referenced article and the bottom of the story is that this fire is a result of the cops using teargas. In case anybody recalls the use of flammable tear gas rounds at Waco, here’s the piece ~ http://partners.nytimes.com/library/national/091499waco-documents.html
The San Bernardino County Sheriff Department is in charge of this operation. The “police officer” killed was a SBCSD Deputy as well as the wounded Deputy. LAPD is there in support.
LAPD is there to make sure Dorner is dead. And they don’t care how many citizens they have to gun down to make that happen.
Waco was the first thing I thought of. In fact, just saw a 2 hour documentary on the Waco massacre with the FBI insisting the tear gas caused no fires. Also, Wikipedia says 2 of the fires started well within the interior of the structure.
Story of the Century! Feed us more media! Throw us the slop!
Tear gas? My azz.
Hope everyone is taking notes.
Not saying the dude did not having it coming.
Wasn’t it proven that incendiary tear gas was used at Waco? And boy were the winds high that day.. A perfect day to assault the compound if you want to burn it down.
Chris Dorner was a Veteran who murdered innocent people.
Chris Kyle, a real American Hero and Veteran wasn’t given nearly the same news coverage. RIP Kyle.
I’m not sure, but what I do know there were several FBI people on the ground very mad at how the whole situation was being handled and basically blamed the FBI for the deaths of the Davidians.
David Koresh was a nut, but that in and of itself is not a crime.
Add “Ruby Ridge” to that. ATF screwed it all up.
BATF = ROGUE
That’s because Chris Kyle killed enemies of America (and friends of Obama).
Not very news worthy.
We can call him Chris Crispie now.
I wonder why colin powell didn’t offer to try Bo Gritz and try to talk dorner out of the cabin. It was obvious from the manifesto that dorner he’ll powell in the highest esteem...
Hang tough, Chris. Liberal America has your back.
Darwin award for question of the day..goes to:
Cooper to Kyle Martin, son of woman who own(ed) cabin that Dorner hid in:
“So Kyle, how does your family feel about watching your home burn on national TV?”
I think they lost power to Kyle before he could answer. I would have liked to hear him say: “Well Anderson, we are glad that Cooper chose our home to sabotage, hide out, die and ultimately get torched in. The bathrooms were too small and we were thinking of remodeling anyway.”
This isn’t a manhunt. It’s an assassination.
How is that a Darwin award?
I’m pretty sure Cooper wasn’t going to reproduce anyway, but how does that question prevent him from doing so?
Who was assassinated?
I don’t think cooper got torched. Touched, maybe.
I would also like to know who was “assassinated”. Was it the people murdered by Dorner that you are referring to?
Did I say Dorner assassinated his victims?
No, LAPD has been out to assassinate Dorner before we find out what he knows. They have no intention of taking him alive, and are willing to harm innocent civilians if necessary.
Anyone who murders 4 people has nothing I need to know. Maybe you want to, which is odd.
I didn’t realize I was writing to somebody gullible who trusts Police 100%. Sorry. I am a bit more of a skeptic.
Haha. “Skeptic”. So that’s what you call it nowadays.
I’d rather be a “skeptic” than “gullible.” But, it’s all academic now. We’ll never know, and the LAPD will just go on another shooting spree when it suits them. Fine with me, I don’t live there.
Dorner doesn’t deserve to let people “know” why He’s murdering innocent people. The LAPD just didn’t go out and start shooting people. There kind of was a guy running around shooting them. In case you missed it.
LAPD shot innocent bystanders (in vehicles that did not look like the suspect’s) because they were so anxious to shut Dorner up, so yes, they did “go out and start shooting people.” Dorner did not force them to shoot those people.
I was all in for LAPD at first, until they shot the two Asian ladies and that other fellow heading to the beach. They’re now nothing more than a glorified street gang with badges in my eyes. If that’s fine with you, then we’re finished here. I have nothing more to say to a street gang groupie.
Interesting tactics. Name a police department a ‘street gang’ and then say that I am fine with them shooting innocent people, so in turn, I am a ‘street gang groupie’. Solid stuff there.
The cops should be held accountable for their actions. Tensions were high, as the murderer was effective at killing. But that doesn’t excuse them at all. They should be held responsible.
You were never for the LAPD. Don’t kid yourself. How can you be for something, and then in the next sentence call them a street gang? You have an agenda and you hate cops. I understand that.
I’m not the one wanting to “know” what Dorner had to say. That’s you. “Dorner was nothing more than a glorified terrorist with guns, in my eyes. If thats fine with you, then were finished here. I have nothing more to say to a terrorist groupie.”
Cute. Very cute. I had nothing against the cops until they started gunning down innocent people (a practice you apparently approve), but I do have something against Obama-Loving Simps: You are OK with LAPD selecting and killing targets without due process (even if civilian innocents are harmed in the process), so therefore you are OK with Obama selecting and killing targets without due process (even if civilian innocents are harmed in the process).
QED: You are an Obama-Loving Simp. We are indeed finished here, OLS.
I love the pattern I'm seeing for cop appologists:
The cops shouod be accountable. Make excuse. The cops should be accountable.
They wont be, and the cover-up is in full swing. Evidence? What are the names of the cops involved in the shooting 'mistakes'?
We would already know the names of any 'civilian' who did the same thing...and, they'd be in jail. Not on a paid vacation.
To me, being held accountable means trigger-happy cops being stripped of the authority and immunity they enjoy, then being tried in open court for attempted murder as any “little person” would be while being held in jail on an outrageous bond. But you are quite correct, it’ll never happen.
No doubt members of the LAPD street gang are all smiles and back-slaps this morning because “they got their man” last night. And the gal who tipped them off in Big Bear won’t see a penny of the million-dollar reward that was offered.
You need some English lessons there bud.
Not sure how you gathered that I am ok with gunning down innocent people. Your logic is astounding.
Wikipedia articles are just opinions of Wikipedophiles.
Wikipedia isn’t any more or less reliable than any other source on earth. At the end of the day you have to use your own judgement.
My guess is the Davidians set the structure on fire.
Nice attempt at distraction.
Nice cookie cutter response. It wasn’t a “distraction”. It was a observation of your english skills. Which proved to be lacking.
I clearly stated that they should be held accountable. I then stated why they might have been so trigger happy, and then said “But” that doesn’t matter and they should be held responsible.
Pot meet kettle.
Oh wow. You got me. Congratulations.
At least mine was a typo and not complete lack of comprehension.
At least mine was a typo and not complete lack of comprehension.
Actually, yours was a problem with capitalization and an incomplete sentence. So, enough of your distraction. I get enough grading in with the MBA course that I'm teaching anyway.
Back to my initial point that you deflected.
They wont be (held accountable), and the cover-up is in full swing. Evidence? What are the names of the cops involved in the shooting 'mistakes'? We would already know the names of any 'civilian' who did the same thing...and, they'd be in jail. Not on a paid vacation.
Good grief. Do you listen to yourself? I said they should be punished. Whether they will or not is not what I am arguing. I am arguing that they should be punished. So, considering, that is what I originally said, who’s the one that is deflecting?
I don't talk to myself.
Anything else of substance you want to say? Because, cookie cutter responses are only funny for so long.