One difficulty with trying to inform people about voter fraud is that the the myriad of techniques used challenge the minimally computer literate. Another is actual counting anomalies are next to impossible to prove, and the complete lack of audit trail is a fact, but only meaningful to the technically literate.
My favorite example to awaken a few to the importance of factual data is to remind people who almost always have strong opinions about O. J. Simpson - people who often mention that his innocence was the result of the ignorant (and black) jurors. Few understand the meaning of a audit trail, which is what lost by rejecting paper ballots to provide and audit trail for a local hand count. The O.J. Jury Chair was black, and she was a Systems Analyst (for Lockheed I believe). When all of the physical data collected by the two “criminalists”, each of whom testified to having signed and dated every piece of evidence, but only one signature appeared on all the evidence submitted, all the physical evidence became irrelevant. The audit trail was flagrantly violated. The data were corrupted. Our votes have had the potential for an audit trail removed, by leaders of both political parties.
Federal voting - and I'm sure legislators know it - has become a mechanism for informing the public what the “majority of people wants from them.” We are not a representative republic. What we have done is to eliminate the possibility of recounts, or audit trails. There is no way to show that the precincts run by Secretaries of State, most of whose employees work for the SEIU, actually count votes at all. That is why George Soros funded a fifty million dollar “Secretary of State Project.” Once a voter marks a ballot, or touches a screen, that event disappears behind court protected software that presumably tabulates the votes.
Remember that one of Obama’s first jobs was to work for Acorn's “Project Vote”, funded by George Soros. There are so many ways to manipulate the presumed counts of citizens or non-citizens, that the busing of illegals and multiple votes by enthusiastic supporters may be irrelevant. Our voting system is less likely to represent actual counts than polls, since polling enterprises do lose business if their predictions are worthless. The SEIU has been run by former 60’s radical for two decades. Their business is organization, like our “Community Activist in Chief”, and their goal is “Socialism/Communism.”
Corruption has so thoroughly penetrated our federal bureaucracy that elections are almost certainly bought. Much of Obama’s campaign funding came from the same source that funded his college education, The Saudi Royal Family, and Muslim Brotherhood in particular. (Never forget Malcolm X's attorney, Percy Sutton, who told us clearly that Obama’s mentor was Alwaleed bin-Talal). Those of us who don't want to lose more of our freedoms need to communicate while we still can, before the 1.5 billion hollow point bullets are pointed at us. If we don't act, we can recall that it took the USSR about seventy years to collapse, and hope that our children will have some memory of The Constitution that once protected us.
A technical thread on vote fraud would certainly be useful. There are some non-profits, and lots of engineering professors who have shown the vulnerability of computer-based voting. But professors depend upon grants, and their schools even more so. I have watched some vocal crusaders who exposed the vulnerability of machine after machine quiet down. There still seems no alternative close to requiring paper ballots, preserved after being counted locally by precinct volunteers, before the ballots leave the room in which they were cast.
Absentee ballots will require much scrutiny. Today they are entirely unverifiable, having been delivered by government (SEIU) employees, to be counted by SEIU employees. How long would an SEIU employee keep his or her job if he exposes mishandling of ballots. How could he or she put his family at risk of retribution? We have an excellent example with the ballots presumably sent to overseas military. They are almost never delivered on time, and almost never counted in states with large overseas military constituents. Ballots are lost at sea, in airplane crashes.
Our last election was filled, even by the state-controlled media, with stories of precincts with more votes for Obama than there were eligible adults in the district. There were many districts in Pennsylvania and Ohio with 100% votes for Obama, several of which counted 140% of the number or voters registered, when the state average runs around 45%. Voting in the US is a joke, and a tragic one, because the destruction of our voting system is costing our freedoms, and the freedoms of our children, should they stay to live in the mess we are leaving them.
One suggestion, since it is unlikely that anyone in Congress will take on such an unpopular topic to “statists” is to for a group, a Tea Party perhaps, to organize an unofficial audit of elections. For the moment, secret ballots are a myth. There is no guarantee that absentee ballots are not correlated to names and addresses. A group could ask its members to volunteer their voting choices. While many of the most flagrantly suspicious tallies occurred in precincts with presumed homogeneous populations, the manipulation of reported votes may simply be a tool being used to divide groups. Remember it was black voters who passed the heterogeneous marriage initiative in California, and polls of US Citizens living in Israel, largely secular and well-to-do, do not correlate with the same class of Jews voting locally Haaretz reported 89% supported Romney while the same social group in the the US claimed 70% support for Obama. Controlling the vote provides a political tool.
Organizing a backup count will put those who decided what counts to report on their guard, and perhaps expose more certain fraud, not that Wisconsin, Missouri, Colorado, and Florida haven't provided sufficient evidence. Every time Allen West challenged the count in his losing bid, it changed in his favor, with the largest apparent fraud never having been addressed. Had a Tea Party provided a "lower bound", he may well have prevailed - with the support of the Republican Party, which was "soft." It also appears that making voting relevant is a bipartisan issue, not to the far left, but to many mainstream Democrats who have lost their party to Communists and Muslims.
ping #14 fo later read
Paper ballots have their problems, too. Stacks of them being premarked in the back room of the union hall or in the faculty lounge to be used to replace legitimate votes in conservative districts; boxes of them "found" after the RATs know how many they need to win; absentee ballots submitted by individuals who have voted in another location; intentional delay of military absentee ballots to invalidate them...
Thanks for your informative post.