Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitsubishi i available for just $69 a month in this outrageous lease (100% electric)
AutoBlogGreen ^ | January 22, 2013 | Jon LeSage

Posted on 02/25/2013 8:17:21 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: editor-surveyor

Between his parents and me he hopefully will not be a lib


21 posted on 02/25/2013 10:21:32 PM PST by notaliberal ( Democraps denied God thrice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"With just 62 miles between no charge and a full charge, the Mitsubishi i is tethered by the shortest range in the electric-car segment. In comparison, the Leaf's range is 73 miles, while the 2013 Ford Focus Electric promises 85-100 miles....This Mitsu goes from no charge to full charge in 7 hours using a 240-volt home charging unit, and while this is competitive with the charge time required of the Nissan Leaf, it falls short relative to the Focus Electric's claimed 3-4 hours."

Definitely a niche car, but what niche? If you live in the city any car costs a lot to keep because of parking fees. If you live just outside the city limits, but not in an apartment (no quick charging 240V station -- recharging the battery when empty takes about 22 hours using a 120-volt household outlet) this car might be barely functional as long as you only live 25 miles from work.

Electric cars are not ready for prime time, despite all the lies the government tells us.

22 posted on 02/25/2013 11:26:12 PM PST by zipper ("The Second Amendment IS my carry permit!" -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve86
About half or less the cost of coal. Cost about 6 cents kWh here. Grand Coulee Dam alone capacity = 7,000 MW. Average coal plant 1/10 that.

Yes,I'm aware of hydroelectric power's existence and that,in the US at least,it's about the cheapest form of power to be found.However,according to wikipedia (yah,I know) coal represents about 42% of the nation's power generation while hydro represents 6.4%.In my statement I said "on a large scale".To me,42% is "large scale",6.4% isn't.

I did some research recently and found that Quebec gets a huge portion of their electricity from hydro.In fact I just looked it up (wikipedia again) and found that 95% of the power generated there is hydro.I've also read that Quebec exports a good portion of the power they generate to other parts of Canada and the Northeastern US and that Quebecers pay something like 5 cents per kWh for power.We pay 20 cents where I live.

23 posted on 02/26/2013 5:05:24 AM PST by Gay State Conservative ("Progressives" toss the word "racist" around like chimps toss their feces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson