Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sheriff Joe Now Investigating Obama Alias Harry Bounel: Obama Mama In WA In 1961 (Arpaio)
BirtherReport.com ^ | February 25, 2013 | Al Hendershot

Posted on 02/25/2013 9:25:42 PM PST by Seizethecarp

Today, I had a conversation with an investigator from the Cold Case Posse in AZ. We talked and I expanded on several dossiers filled with evidence for over an hour. They asked for all of my relevant information on Obama, the Harry Bounel alias evidence, and the dossiers I completed on Stanley Ann Dunham, her parents, and Michelle Obama as well. They have it all. BTW they also say that it looks like my information cannot be disproved and will be useful.

I have proof, definitive proof that Stanley Ann Dunham was in WA state in "1961" as per the issuance of a SSN numident in her name with the SSN 535-40-8522. There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA, not HI.

(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Heated Discussion; Politics
KEYWORDS: afterbirfturds; arizona; awjeez; awjeeznotthisagain; birftards; birtherbs; birthers; bs; certifigate; conspiracy; doesntiteverstop; harrybounel; hawaii; jihad; joearpaio; kenyanbornmuzzie; kgb; naturalborncitizen; obama; patricelumumbaschool; russia; sheriffjoe; stanleyanndunham; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 861-869 next last

1 posted on 02/25/2013 9:25:48 PM PST by Seizethecarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Great news...good to see the Posse still active.

Of course, the so called “conservative” media will refuse to report this....too busy with talking about Michelle’s booty and the MSNBC hyped squester. Sad we have so many PhonyCon Obama Supporters (I’m looking at you Hannity, Levin, Coulter, Malkin, et al) who continue to give Obama a pass on eligibility


2 posted on 02/25/2013 9:30:42 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void; LucyT; Red Steel; Flotsam_Jetsome

“There is no way that she was in HI and I have proof because in the fall she was in college in WA, not HI.”

Al Hendershot says he has confirmed Arpaio Posse interest in his Harry Bounel file and the links to Mooshell.

While Hendershot has been an able investigator of Barry’s SS# trail it appears that it is news to Hendershot that Barry’s mom was in WA in the fall of 1961. Being in HI in the fall of 1961 does NOT prove that SADO was not in HI earlier in the year, of course.


3 posted on 02/25/2013 9:36:17 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Bump


4 posted on 02/25/2013 9:37:07 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

It might prove she wasn’t in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961??


5 posted on 02/25/2013 9:37:52 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

It might prove she wasn’t in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961??


6 posted on 02/25/2013 9:38:07 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Do you have any information on the unwed Mother’s home in WA?

It may have been connected to the church they attended there...Unitarian?

I had read that they were on the Canadian border and used a Canadian hospital for deliveries for cost savings.

I have read nothing on this for a year or so.


7 posted on 02/25/2013 9:42:49 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Do you have any information on the unwed Mother’s home in WA?

It may have been connected to the church they attended there...Unitarian?

I had read that they were on the Canadian border and used a Canadian hospital for deliveries for cost savings.

I have read nothing on this for a year or so.


8 posted on 02/25/2013 9:43:02 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY

oops, sorry for double post. don’t think I did it.


9 posted on 02/25/2013 9:44:58 PM PST by 3D-JOY (If you missed FR as much as I did...please make an extra donation to keep it running...right now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Everyone knows she was in WA state in the fall of 1961, it’s part of her wiki biography.

This is a big so what.


10 posted on 02/25/2013 9:50:11 PM PST by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty
I'm willing to keep an open mind on Obama’s eligibility, but I'm also pragmatic. President Obama was elected twice. No one is going to remove a sitting president on his second term. Can you imagine the absolute chaos this would cause? That doesn't make it right, btw, but it's something you should at least consider. Is Obama’s eligibility so important that it's worth tearing the country apart? You might think it's worth it, but most people, even good conservatives, probably wouldn't.

That's what upsets me about your post. You slander some folks, like Levin and Malkin, for being “PhonyCon” Obama supporters. Levin and Malkin are both great spokespeople for conservative causes. They aren't “Obama Supporters” simply because they disagree with you on eligibility.

11 posted on 02/25/2013 9:54:04 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

While Hendershot has been an able investigator of Barry’s SS# trail it appears that it is news to Hendershot that Barry’s mom was in WA in the fall of 1961. Being in HI in the fall of 1961 does NOT prove that SADO was not in HI earlier in the year, of course.


One thing to note: If SAD was in WA state the fall of ‘61...she would have had to been on the mainland for a while.

The airlines back them did not allow pregnant women 6 mos or more preg. to fly back then...especially an unaccompanied young pregnant women. Also, they were very strict on flying with relatively newborn children...and would have definitely raised alarm with an unaccompanied white women with a black/mixed race baby....even a liberal state like Hawaii would have prevented such travel

My mother experienced this when we had to go back overseas on an accompanied tour of Germany, and they tried to prevent my mom from traveling, as she was 6 mos along w my brother.


12 posted on 02/25/2013 9:54:49 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 3D-JOY

“Do you have any information on the unwed Mother’s home in WA?”

No. And I am not inclined to believe she and her family were portraying herself as unwed.

I accept the FOIA documentation as most likely genuine (it destroys Barry’s Dreams narrative). In those documents U of HI staff informed INS that BHO Sr. had impregnated and reportedly “married” a coed on the exact date claimed in the HI marriage record and divorce document, a coed who was living with her parents.

BHO Sr. was already suspected by INS and U of HI (and later Harvard) of being married and also that there was discussion of putting the child up for adoption with the Salvation Army likely due to SADO’s age and BHO Sr’s student status (and the baby’s race?).

Bottom line I don’t see a shameful hiding away in an unwed home, especially when the grandparents announce the birth in the newspaper (I am inclined to regard those announcements as genuine although they do not prove HI birth).


13 posted on 02/25/2013 9:59:49 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Other than it’s interesting, what difference will it make? No one will confront Obama about more egregious elements of his shady past than this.


14 posted on 02/25/2013 10:00:01 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

That’s what upsets me about your post. You slander some folks, like Levin and Malkin, for being “PhonyCon” Obama supporters. Levin and Malkin are both great spokespeople for conservative causes. They aren’t “Obama Supporters” simply because they disagree with you on eligibility.


Had they taken Obama Eligibility seriously, and not wasted their time and media sphere on piddling issues (who sits on an NRLB is trivial compared to the constiutional eligiblity of the President, Mr Levin)....Obama definitely would not have won a second term, possibly not even finished his first.

And, Michelle Malkin actually attacked the Cold Case Posse in some of her articles....referrring to the Posse and Obama Eligibility people as “Truthers” and comparing them to 9/11 Truthers. And you call that “good for conservative causes”?

It is more than indifference...some of these people have attacked Obama Eligibility folks as bad as MSNBC has (esp Malkin and Coulter). Levin always brags about his “Landmark Legal Foundation got Clinton’s law license revoked in Arkansas”....hey a President who is not eligible is much more important than one who got busy with an intern

They spend more time talking about Michelle Obama’s butt than they do on her husbands eligibility


15 posted on 02/25/2013 10:04:05 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

BTTT.


16 posted on 02/25/2013 10:07:33 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Bottom line I don’t see a shameful hiding away in an unwed home, especially when the grandparents announce the birth in the newspaper (I am inclined to regard those announcements as genuine although they do not prove HI birth).


A mixed race black/white baby in 1961 would something even the most liberal family would not want out in public. Even in liberal states back in the early ‘60s that was really frowned upon. Something that today would not be an issue....but 50 yrs ago would be


17 posted on 02/25/2013 10:11:21 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Is Obama’s eligibility so important that it’s worth tearing the country apart? You might think it’s worth it, but most people, even good conservatives, probably wouldn’t.

If it is a blatant breaking of the constitution, YES IT IS!!!

Some principles are worth suffering and even dying for, the TRUTH is one of those.


18 posted on 02/25/2013 10:12:43 PM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

You make it sound like the country isn’t being torn apart now.


19 posted on 02/25/2013 10:14:30 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty
I think it's a stretch to say “Obama definitely would not have won a second term” had Levin and Malkin taken Obama’s eligibility seriously, and the US Senate would have never voted to impeach Obama in his first term.

I think we'll find out more about President Obama after he's out of office, but the man's not going to be impeached. I think that's part of the reason why some conservatives aren't interested in pursuing “Truther” discussions. Pragmatically speaking, no one is going to remove a sitting president from office over the sort of “evidence” that's been presented so far or is likely to be found in the future.

As far as conservative pundits making fun of “Truthers,” some Truthers are nutjobs. Sorry. I've read some Obama eligibility theories that border on the absurd. I thought the Cold Case Posse did good work, but even they didn't say Obama’s documents were definite frauds. They only said the documents appeared fake. That's not conclusive evidence that Obama is ineligible.

20 posted on 02/25/2013 10:26:12 PM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 861-869 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson