Citing to an earlier decision on the same issue is not dicta.
Aren’t you perhaps forgetting that Judge Malihi offered the plaintiffs a default judgment against Obama due to Obama’s attorney failing to show up at trial?
It was the plaintiffs, not the judge who rejected a default order and requested a trial on the merits, which the judge granted. “Trial on the merits” was the plaintiffs’ language.
Judge Mahili’s ruling after trial was sent to the Georgia Secretary of State, Brian Kemp who accepted it. Kemp’s acceptance was appealed in Georgia Superior Court. They upheld it. The plaintiffs then appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court. They too refused to overturn Malihi and Kemp. Plaintiff Farrar asked Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to issue a Stay, Justice Thomas denied it. Plaintiff Welden petitioned the US Supreme Court to hear his appeal, the Court denied the petition.
Only a Fogblower or clone could pull the appeals history of Malihi’s ruling up so quickly, of course.
Malihi looked to the same flawed parsing of the clear NBC definition in MvH committed by the Ankeny court and also the delusional claim by the Ankeny court that the WKA court ruled that WKA was NBC. The WKA court ruling was that WKA was as much a CITIZEN as an NBC which is an unequivocal distinction between CITIZEN and NBC right there in the WKA ruling.
A state appeals court and an administrative law judge cannot reverse a SCOTUS holding.
I will stipulate that Dr. Taitz has never understood the Federal Rules of Evidence or the difference between civil and criminal law and that her appearance before Malihi was grossly incompetent.
If we can agree on that then the result that her witnesses were not properly qualified as experts before rendered any testimony about evidence they presented “not persuasive.”
There remains no federal court discovery order for Barry’s HI BC, INS/passport records, Social Security records or Selective Service Records.
BTW, what would be your explanation for why Barry has NEVER “released” his HI vital records, as in signed a legal release granting access to forensic examiners?
And why did his own attorney REFUSE to allow Barry to hold his own alleged LFBC at the big “release” to the media even when a White House reporter pointedly suggested that having Barry hold it might reduce inevitable skepticism over its authenticity?
This behavior reflects clear consciousness of guilt and/or deception to any competent investigator or observer.