Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: stormer

Note that she says “may be.” Not “are.”
So for just having served in the military, YOU “may be” mentally ill and therefore should be deprived of YOUR Second Amendment rights.


9 posted on 03/10/2013 12:02:33 AM PST by MestaMachine (Sometimes the smartest man in the room is standing in the midst of imbeciles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: MestaMachine
Yes, a “veteran may be mentally ill” - do you dispute that? And I for one believe that mentally ill people shouldn't have guns regardless if they're vets...
11 posted on 03/10/2013 12:06:19 AM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: MestaMachine
"Note that she says “may be.” Not “are.” So for just having served in the military, YOU “may be” mentally ill and therefore should be deprived of YOUR Second Amendment rights."

That's the way I read also.

Does she mean WWII vets, Korean War vet, Viet Nam vets or only current war vets?

Is she going to use the VA's determinations or use actually judicial rulings?

16 posted on 03/10/2013 7:39:00 AM PDT by knife6375 (US Navy Veteran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson