Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Old stale RINO Bill Kristol calls Rand Paul ‘Neo-Isolationist’ and 'dangerous' (Video)
Fire Andrea Mitchell ^ | 3/18/13 | FAM Blog

Posted on 03/18/2013 6:25:55 PM PDT by pacificpundit

What do Bill Kristol, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Karl Rove and other old, stale RINO hacks all have in common? They fear Rand Paul and the new generation of libertarian-conservatives or constitutional-conservative. Bill Kristol went on America Live with Megyn Kelly to whine about how ‘dangerous’ the ‘Neo-Isolationist’ Rand Paul is. Kristol also declared that Paul has no political future or something.

(Excerpt) Read more at fireandreamitchell.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: kristol; neocons; randpaul

1 posted on 03/18/2013 6:25:55 PM PDT by pacificpundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

2 posted on 03/18/2013 6:28:58 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

I really couldn’t care less about this so-called conservative anymore. He’s like the Morning Schmo, pathetic.


3 posted on 03/18/2013 6:29:28 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

Im not fanof the elitist establishment by any means and my past posts will show that but from what I am hearing about Rnd Paul then it seems he is moving closer to his father than I like.

I have to hear more about his foreign policy thus far but he has come out with a nice present for the homosexuals and then illegals.

If he’s moving to a libertarian or that is whta he is then he might as well join the liberals and tell them to change to suit him and their party

time will tell


4 posted on 03/18/2013 6:30:01 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

I’m just getting weary of Paul after his few last comments since he got fame, homosexual agenda, illegals, what;s next weaken defence, if so then he should go and oin the libertarian party as that what he is , liberal on social issues and cut spending on what defends us


5 posted on 03/18/2013 6:31:21 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: manc

He’s more conservative than most of the GOP. But still pretty liberal. His statements and vote a couple weeks back on confirmation prove he is not to be trusted.

Let the fanboys scream. He had a fit in the media, made noise, then caved. That’s the reality. Thus he is not to be trusted.


6 posted on 03/18/2013 6:37:48 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: manc

Oh, I’d agree. Rand Paul raises serious questions. I was just attacking Kristol because he’s a turd, one of these RINO talking heads that infests Fox. He reminds me of an incubating maggot.


7 posted on 03/18/2013 6:40:24 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: manc

Oh, I’d agree. Rand Paul raises serious questions. I was just attacking Kristol because he’s a turd, one of these RINO talking heads that infests Fox. He reminds me of an incubating maggot.


8 posted on 03/18/2013 6:40:24 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

you said it very good but if you don;t mind I;ll add, it seems now days later that it was for him to gain attention IMHO


9 posted on 03/18/2013 6:41:38 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

Kristol: another guy who’s outlived his usefulness and just needs to disappear.


10 posted on 03/18/2013 6:42:10 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (This stuff we're going through now, this is nothing compared to the middle ages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Kristol, Krauthammer, Perino, Rove, Peggy Noonan Hume and their ilk have been living in a bubble , going to too many cocktail elitist parites and they have no idea what the average person wants back in AK, GA, MS, AL, SC, TN, TX, north FL, South VA, most of NC ETC ETC ETC

That does not include most of the midwest and then there is AK which the left likes to make fun of


11 posted on 03/18/2013 6:44:21 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

Rand Paul is Isolationist.

And he is pushing for abandoning Social Conservatism, which disqualifies him as a real conservative.

He actually fits right in with the new GOPe Autopsy Report on social issues.


12 posted on 03/18/2013 6:47:59 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (We have No Opposition to Obama's Socialist Agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: manc
Like his dad, Rand is no friend of Israel and I believe that's why Kristol (also not particularly conservative, though he is ardently pro-life) claim's Rand is "neo-isolationist" even "dangerously isolationist."

What he, Kristol is, is pro-Israel and neither Ron nor son Rand will defend Israel and that is becoming clear every day!

13 posted on 03/18/2013 6:50:05 PM PDT by zerosix (Native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zerosix

just have a feeling that Rand saw the problems his dad went through and has polished up.
he got in a state where his seat is safe, just like his father did.
He made a slash and got fame and since then has been sounding like his father since.

If he’s not a republican then stop pretending to be and go and join what is dad should join the libertarian party.

Why is it anyway libertarians never try and infiltrate the left as they have so much more in common with them anyway


14 posted on 03/18/2013 6:54:17 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

While what those ppl have in common is that they are not listening to, I am zero fan of Paul and the Libertarian madness. I want, we need, conservatives.


15 posted on 03/18/2013 6:54:29 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

then Rand lie his nut bag father should join their own party and the GOP should stop this crap, why should non republicans be allowed to use our platform to spout their crap


16 posted on 03/18/2013 6:55:41 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

Republican Senator Rand Paul has drawn an indelible line in the sand for all to choose which side to stand on the Limits of Presidential Power.

Kristol has chosen, by his words, to do what all good Royalists have always done: showcase their unwavering public support of THEIR KING.

20 % of our forefathers were Royalists in our Revolutionary War.

Royalists were loyal to the King of England, and firmly believed in the credo: “ My King, right or wrong.”

Bill Kristol would have been content as a Royalist from start to finish of our Revolutionary War.

Kings easily become tyrants with increased power.

It seems that the more mentally unbalanced the tyrant, the more tyrannical he becomes.

I seriously doubt that true-blue Royalists such as Kristol, can ever reach a limit to their tolerance of what their King would ever chose to do.

Kristol chose to never, ever doubt that his King Obama is now, or ever could become a tyrant.

Royalists, especially those in the Media, such as Editor Kristol, do not understand what Constitutional Checks and Balances are meant to do.

I seriously doubt that Kristol ever will understand Constitutional Checks and Balances.

Kristol had done the GOP a great favor by starkly showing that the Royalists in the GOP are really Tyrant B. Hussein Obama’s best friends.

Let the long-awaited purge of the GOP Elite Royalists begin !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


17 posted on 03/18/2013 7:12:00 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

Republican Senator Rand Paul has drawn an indelible line in the sand for all to choose which side to stand on the Limits of Presidential Power.

Kristol has chosen, by his words, to do what all good Royalists have always done: showcase their unwavering public support of THEIR KING.

20 % of our forefathers were Royalists in our Revolutionary War.

Royalists were loyal to the King of England, and firmly believed in the credo: “ My King, right or wrong.”

Bill Kristol would have been content as a Royalist from start to finish of our Revolutionary War.

Kings easily become tyrants with increased power.

It seems that the more mentally unbalanced the tyrant, the more tyrannical he becomes.

I seriously doubt that true-blue Royalists such as Kristol, can ever reach a limit to their tolerance of what their King would ever chose to do.

Kristol chose to never, ever doubt that his King Obama is now, or ever could become a tyrant.

Royalists, especially those in the Media, such as Editor Kristol, do not understand what Constitutional Checks and Balances are meant to do.

I seriously doubt that Kristol ever will understand Constitutional Checks and Balances.

Kristol had done the GOP a great favor by starkly showing that the Royalists in the GOP are really Tyrant B. Hussein Obama’s best friends.

Let the long-awaited purge of the GOP Elite Royalists begin !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


18 posted on 03/18/2013 7:12:01 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

I don’t like everything Rand stands for, but you can know a man by his enemies and man, is he making all the right ones.


19 posted on 03/18/2013 7:43:07 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

Another hack who helped give us w McCain and myth.


20 posted on 03/18/2013 7:47:58 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave ofo attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

How come the Left gets to pick and brand all our ‘conservatives’?

It’s like the Chinese Reds picking the Dalai Lama for the Buddhists.


21 posted on 03/18/2013 8:00:03 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

[[Im not fanof the elitist establishment by any means and my past posts will show that but from what I am hearing about Rnd Paul then it seems he is moving closer to his father than I like.]]

Spot on- I applaud Rand for soem htigns, while cringe at others- He was the ONLY one to make dear leader back down on missle drones- the only one who had enougbh backbone to take them on- but at the same time- he does have a very dangerous foreign affairs ideology- perhaps not as bad as his pop, but still dangeroA lot of rhinos bark loud, but tuck tasil when push coems to shove- but paul actuallty took bull by horns and forced a change- I’m not sayign we need paul but we NEED more with his backbone i nthe GOP because the GOP is FAILING Miserably!


22 posted on 03/18/2013 8:24:00 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

[[I was just attacking Kristol because he’s a turd,]]

Can’t fault you there- more andm ore fox news contributors and show hosts are falling in line behind dear leader these days- defendign him (while making it appear they are just being ‘fair and balanced’) and the right is slowly but surely losing hte one voice it had i nthe media— all the old ‘staunch republicans’ like kristol, krauthammer etc- seem to lean more andm ore left as tiem goes on


23 posted on 03/18/2013 8:26:34 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: manc

Funny how people take the label of “defense” so seriously. We used to call that executive department “war,” which had the drawback of being honest. You may believe in the thing called defense, either as it is or were there more. But it has little to do with actual defense, whatever it is.


24 posted on 03/18/2013 8:31:04 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

Yes, it’s strange. Sometimes, Democrat Pat Caddell comes across as MORE conservative than the people who call themselves conservative!


25 posted on 03/18/2013 8:33:27 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: manc
Well, you've hit on all the issues that I've come to realize about Rand, i.e. sounding sort of Republican (conservative) with a bit of libertarian slant especially one that TEA Party folk like, just enough anti-establishment red meat to toss to those who either don't vote or register "independent" but don't often grace the voting booth, to generate enthusiasm.

I'm not going to count him out - yet - but Rand's trending toward daddy Ron's total Libertarian bent.

Ron ran as a Libertarian and should have in 2012 rather than taking up space on stage and mugging for the cameras and I'm strongly thinking that Rand is a chip off the old block!

26 posted on 03/18/2013 8:38:59 PM PDT by zerosix (Native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

“Rand Paul is Isolationist”

If he is, then that term has no meaning. It’s sorta like how if you want to slow tge rate of gubmint growth, or God forbid actually cut gubmint spending, progressives will accuse you of vein an anarchist or turning the clock back to the 19th century. Or, on our side to be fair, when we accuse people who have gotten used to the Welfare State as it is of being communists. Fascists, maybe, though that term has been corrupted beyond use. This is all gross exaggeration.

By the way, I happened recently to read a few excerpts from Carroll Quigly’s “Tragedy and Hope,” which offers a glimpse at the inner workings of the Anglo-American Establishment cabal, tge banking and other sorts of super-rich family dynasties, you know, the Fed, the CFR, Bilderbergs, etc. Anyway, one of his favorite epithets is “neo-isolationist,” along with “petite bourgeois.” They were especially guilty for having backed Goldwater.

That should give you good context for Kristol’s comments.


27 posted on 03/18/2013 8:45:32 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Rand Paul is Open Borders, Amnesty Liberal, and supports Free Trade.. so not sure where he is “isolationist”.

Actually, we could use some isolation now, instead of this Free Trade Communist Globalist nonsense we have now....unfortunately too many PhonyCons want the US to be the EU. No more Bush RINO nonsense


28 posted on 03/18/2013 11:32:28 PM PDT by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Not sure I’d want to read a book that heavily influenced Bill Clinton’s thinking.

If I want conspiracy to entertain myself, I just go right to Oliver Stone’s JFK.

Rand Paul is quite isolationist. He is to the Left of Obama on the war on terror.


29 posted on 03/19/2013 6:20:54 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (We have No Opposition to Obama's Socialist Agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

“Rand Paul is Open Borders, Amnesty Liberal, and supports Free Trade.. so not sure where he is “isolationist”.”

I’ll simply direct to the omission of foreign policy in your statement.

Of course, you are correct in consequences. Isolationism usually results in war. So, in the realm of consequences of policy, I guess you are right. His policies may lead to war as they have in the past, specifically WWII.


30 posted on 03/19/2013 6:33:08 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (We have No Opposition to Obama's Socialist Agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pacificpundit

I think the globalist’s military, nation building days of the Rinos are numbered, Bill.

It’s one thing to defend your nation, take out the bad guys and get out. It’s another to serve as social engineers with a military with the military as social workers. Soldiers are not social workers and they kill their enemies. Then they go home.


31 posted on 03/19/2013 6:25:22 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson