Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clue Number Two: The HDOH Gave Obama the BC# for Stig Waidelich
Butterdezillion's Blog ^ | March 24, 2013 | butterdezillion

Posted on 03/24/2013 4:25:35 PM PDT by butterdezillion

Virginia Sunahara's death certificate showed us that somebody at the HDOH is ordering vital records to be falsified, and a subordinate is resisting by putting in deliberate red flags which seem to point to the BC#'s as fabricated.

Having seen from 1960 CDC documents the order in which Hawaii BC's were numbered, and based on concurring testimony from Oahu's local registrar in 1961, we now know that at least 4 August 1961 BC#'s have been altered by the HDOH. The BC# that Obama has now originally belonged to the 3rd Honolulu birth after Gretchen Nordyke - which was almost certainly Stig Waidelich. The BC# the HDOH has for Stig Waidelich right now demands a 12,400% increase in birth rates for that 2.5-hour period between Gretchen Nordyke's birth and his.

I will copy my actual blog post documenting this, in the first comment so the HTML transfers.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: 007; afterbirfturds; awjeez; awjeeznotthisagain; birftards; birthers; bs; certifigate; congress; conspiracy; corruption; eligibility; hdohcorruption; mediabias; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2013 4:25:35 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Clue #2: Stig Waidelich’s BC# Clearly Altered, Almost Certainly Given to Obama

In the first installment (at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/hdoh-red-flags.pdf ), we saw from the Sunahara death certificate that the document was not only forged at the HDOH, but somebody there deliberately put in red flags to make it clear that it was a forgery. Similar red flags were noted in the Ah Nee and Obama long-form birth certificates. Why were all those records falsified? The red flags showed up near or on the BC#’s, which points us to our next clue:

Clue #2: Four of the August 1961 BC#’s that the HDOH has disclosed were changed BY THE HDOH from their original 1961 owners – the 3 records with the red flags, and the short-form BC of Stig Waidelich.

First some essential background on how the BC’s were numbered. The documentation for this (and additional details) can be seen at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/hawaii-bc-numbering-system1.pdf .

Each month the local registrars kept the BC’s for births from each of the CDC’s Hawaii geographic areas in their own region/batch in chronological order according to the time of birth. On the 4th of the month the outlying islands mailed all the BC’s in their office to the state registrar. When those BC’s were received at the state registrar’s office, all the state’s BC’s for that month were placed in this order, numbered consecutively, and microfilmed for the CDC in BC# order with a cover sheet (“target”) between the different regions:

1. Hilo, in chronological order
2. The remainder of Hawaii County, in chronological order
3. Honolulu, in chronological order
4. The remainder of Honolulu County, in chronological order
5. Kalawao County, in chronological order
6. Kauai County, in chronological order
7. Maui, in chronological order

So all the Honolulu births for August of 1961 were numbered in chronological order. After them come the BC’s for the rest of Oahu, numbered chronologically.

We have apparently-HDOH-certified records showing the BC#’s for 5 children born at Kapiolani Hospital in Aug of 1961. But of those 5 people, only twins Susan and Gretchen Nordyke are in chronological order (Below, I will explain why Waidelich’s BC# cannot be in chronological order).

Here are the HDOH’s disclosed Kapiolani births in chronological order, with the BC#’s for comparison:

Name DOB time of birth BC# Notes

Barack Obama Aug 4 10641 Blatant signs of forgery
Susan Nordyke Aug 5 2:12pm 10637
Gretchen Nordyke Aug 5 2:17pm 10638
Stig Waidelich Aug 5 4:47pm 10920 Computer printout only
Johanna Ah Nee Aug 23 9995 Blatant signs of forgery

Stig Waidelich’s BC# is the most blatant anomaly. (See Exhibit A). He was born at the same hospital as Gretchen Nordyke, 2.5 hours later. For Waidelich’s BC# to be in chronological order, there would’ve had to be 281 babies born in Honolulu in the 2.5 hours between Gretchen’s birth and his - but the city of Honolulu averaged 22 births/DAY in Aug of 1961. (281 babies within 2.5 hours or 112 babies/hour, compared to the average rate of .9 babies/hour, is 124 times the average rate.) So babies would have had to be born at 124 TIMES the normal rate (12,400% rate increase), just during those 2.5 hours. Didn’t happen. Waidelich’s BC# is a total fabrication

In addition, we know that Virginia Sunahara was born at Wahiawa Hospital, which is outside of Honolulu. She was born on Aug 4th and so her BC# should be 4 days into the non-Honolulu Oahu births. According to the CDC’s statistics (as analyzed by me using the Nordyke BC#’s as the starting point at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/bc-number-manipulation-analysis.pdf ), the BC#’s in August should have fallen somewhere around these ranges:

Honolulu births 10,539 through 11,222 (22/day)
Other Oahu births 11,223 through 11,781 (18/day)
Other islands 11,782 through 12,001 (7/day)

Four days into August at a rate of 18 births/day means Sunahara’s BC# should have been somewhere from 54-72 later than the first “other Oahu” BC#. So somewhere between 11277 and 11295. But the handwritten number on the death certificate (which had 3 red flags deliberately placed in that line) was 11,080. That BC# is off by about 200 and should belong to somebody born in Honolulu around Aug 25th. Ah Nee, whose BC# from the HDOH had overlapping digits (showing that the BC# was fabricated at the HDOH) was born in Honolulu on Aug 23.

Based on how the numbers fall, it appears that:

1. Obama was given the BC# that originally belonged to Stig Waidelich. (Waidelich was born about 2.5 hours after Gretchen Nordyke, and since the Honolulu rate was almost 1 child/hour, that could easily have made Waidelich the 3rd birth after Gretchen, which means that Waidelich originally had the 10641 BC# that Obama now has).

2. Stig Waidelich was given the BC# that originally belonged to Ray Piiohla, Jr (an infant born on Aug 20 who died at 2 days of age)

3. Virginia Sunahara was given the BC# that originally belonged to Johanna Ah Nee. (The timeline regarding the funny business with her record will be understood as we analyze the clues.)

4. Johanna Ah Nee was given the BC# that originally belonged to an infant who was born on Oahu but outside Honolulu around July 20th.

Obviously, because this analysis is based on statistics that presume a steady rate of births, the numbers may stray a little from the estimated ranges, but not a lot. Waidelich’s BC# in particular is problematic (with a 12,400% variance from the average birth rate within a 2.5-hour period). Yet that was the one that the HDOH and CNN arranged to showcase right before Obama’s forged long-form was released. It’s almost as if they wanted to put a LOT of distance between Obama’s BC# and the person who originally had that BC#.

At this point, no August 1961 vital record disclosed by the current HDOH is credible. They are falsifying and fabricating documents at will. The only credible sources for what really existed in 1961 are the original microfilm rolls, original paper records forensically tested, and the original WORM (write-once-read-many) disks onto which the images were stored from scans when the system was computerized/digitized. These are the documents that Congress should DEMAND AN IMMEDIATE independent investigation of (with Maricopa Co, AZ Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse taking part, for the sake of accountability).

SUMMARY: Stig Waidelich’s computer-generated COLB has a BC# that requires a 12,400% variance from the average birth rate within a 2.5-hour period. It is obviously falsified. So not only do we have paper records (1960-64 birth index, the Ah Nee and Obama BC’s, and the Sunahara death certificate) being falsified by the HDOH, but we have the BC# in the computer system itself being falsified. And all these falsified certificates claimed BC#’s that could not have been on those BC’s in 1961. Stig Waidelich is almost certainly the original owner of the BC# that the HDOH has verified as currently belonging to Obama.

In the next installment we will look at the only circumstance in which a new BC# can lawfully be assigned to a person. That will be the key that opens the door on what the HDOH has done, when, and why. Everything we’ve seen makes sense when we realize how the HDOH could legally try to justify giving Obama the BC# that belonged to Stig Waidelich.

Exhibit A: Stig Waidelich Certificate of Live Birth
(copied from https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:And9GcT5xb4ly8mQ_cmhtdWUa-qYXEfvsk7r3i2130osKGIJGLhPvVK0 – a still photo from a CNN video)

An enlargement found at http://i54.tinypic.com/2ze08wo.jpg


2 posted on 03/24/2013 4:26:22 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Sigh. The spacing didn’t all transfer so it’s not as clear as it could be. Dang.


3 posted on 03/24/2013 4:29:39 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Just ask the mods to pull your comment and take a mulligan.


4 posted on 03/24/2013 4:32:17 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LucyT; null and void; bitt; Fantasywriter; Red Steel; Nachum; Venturer; rolling_stone; Danae; ...

I still don’t have a ping list established. Can you guys ping your lists on this, please?

I’m trying to pull together a lot of documentation, so that if the people Mike Zullo spoke to at CPAC were genuine in their interest, they can see the LEGAL documentation we have which justifies an immediate independent FEDERAL investigation (with full subpoena power for the records necessary to show what really happened, although the clues we have now spell it out pretty clearly already, IMHO).

In particular, if there is an Easter recess, I’d like these people (or their staffers or whoever) to be able to get concise, documented facts. It is obvious that the White House BC image is a forgery; it’s been confirmed by forensic experts and effectively confirmed by the HI state registrar himself (which actually suggests that he is also bucking what he has been ordered to do, which could be a very, very good sign for the country if the Congress-critters play their cards right!). This series will go over what we can document regarding the odd behaviors we’ve seen; when seen in context, the clues make a clear picture.


5 posted on 03/24/2013 4:38:17 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Does WND & Co. know about this?


6 posted on 03/24/2013 4:38:26 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

But how do I get it to show the right way, with the spacing intact? I keep trying to make it so that people don’t have to go to my blog to see the content, since I know very few people click to outside links. But I just can’t figure out how to get it to look like either the Word document or the PDF.


7 posted on 03/24/2013 4:40:19 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
I'd go to this thread, and ask somebody. You can practise there, too.
8 posted on 03/24/2013 4:43:30 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Has HDOH allowed Virginia Sunahara’s surviving brother Duncan to see her ORIGINAL birth record yet? They denied his request for fear that 0bama’s original birth record “pages might get torn” or some such BS like that.


9 posted on 03/24/2013 4:45:32 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (PRISON AT BENGHAZI?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America; kristinn

I don’t know if they do.

My immediate goal was to get the information written down so that the people Mike Zullo spoke to at CPAC could easily see the evidence that shows the White House forgery is NOT just an isolated act by some rogue person, but that the HDOH has coordinated illegal activities with Obama’s people. Those CPAC people apparently told Zullo that they hadn’t heard any of the evidence regarding this. I know that I faxed every R member of Congress to inform them of the legal evidence we had, in December. They and their staffers have blown it all off as if I was a kook with no documentation, though I gave them the link to the affidavit I filed with a LOT of evidence in it.

I don’t know how to put this out there loudly enough that they will pay any attention to it. If WND would get the job done, or Drudge, or somebody.... then that would be the way to go, I suppose. Right now I am exhausted and needing to catch up on home and church things that I’ve neglected for the sake of the research, and just getting the information assembled and out there is about all I can manage.

If there is anybody who knows how to work the system so that this information can get to the CPAC-type people, I beg you to step in and help me; that is not my area of knowledge, expertise, or skill.


10 posted on 03/24/2013 4:49:02 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

They still haven’t.

I can prove that the “policy” that they are talking about (to only issue computer-generated “standard copies”) went into effect THE DAY THAT OBAMA RELEASED THE LONG-FORM FORGERY, because that is the day that the PDF of the supposed document from 2001 was created and posted to their website; a policy cannot go into effect until it is posted publicly.

I also have a UIPA response from the HDOH where I asked for all their documents stating policies for issuance of certified copies, verifications, etc, and was told that there were no records responsive to my request. IOW, the HDOH told me a couple years ago that this 2001 document did not exist - a very strange thing, if they have been religiously requiring the HDOH director to make a deliberate exception for every single long-form they’ve ever printed. Either they lied to me then, or they fabricated that 2001 memo just like I can prove they fabricated the 1960-64 birth index, at least 3 Aug 1961 BC’s, and Virginia Sunahara’s death certificate.

I can also prove that the “policy” is unlawful and cannot be in effect. This policy makes it so that a person applying to be put on a waiting list at the Dept of Hawaiian Homelands (DHHL) has to spend $10 for a certified COLB PLUS $5 to have the other facts from their long-form verified. So the cost of getting a certified copy of ALL the information from the long-form, as required by DHHL, went up 50% as a result of that “policy” that went into effect on April 27, 2011. Hawaii law says that if a policy raises the cost of a service more than 10% it has to be approved through the formal amendment process, which requires posting of the proposed rule change, public hearings, and the signature of the governor before going into effect.

The long and the short of it is that the HDOH is a criminal entity, and we now have the evidence to prove it.

What we still lack is anybody with both the power and the gonads to do anything about it.


11 posted on 03/24/2013 4:59:54 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Bless you and your efforts.


12 posted on 03/24/2013 6:35:37 PM PDT by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
So the cost of getting a certified copy of ALL the information from the long-form, as required by DHHL, went up 50% as a result of that “policy” that went into effect on April 27, 2011. Hawaii law says that if a policy raises the cost of a service more than 10% it has to be approved through the formal amendment process, which requires posting of the proposed rule change, public hearings, and the signature of the governor before going into effect.

Hmmm. I haven't seen that stated before. Very interesting. We know that the Hawaii DHHL has been corrupt for a long time, but this particular bit of corruption is current, and pretty hard for them to dodge. I'd be interested to know what excuse they give--them and their crooked political masters. What does the Governor of Hawaii have to say about this blatant violation of the law?

I suppose it's much like Obama starting a war with Libya without bothering to consult the Senate or the people. He does it because he can, so shut up. Same with Hawaii.

13 posted on 03/24/2013 6:50:03 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt

Thank you. I pray continuously that the Lord would find somebody who can put this information to good use. I think we’ve all been praying that for a long time. I think the Lord’s intervention is needed, and I hope everybody will join me in praying for that.


14 posted on 03/24/2013 6:59:03 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

It was the corruption at the HDOH and in other Hawaii governmental entities that convinced me I needed to go public with the information about that corruption. Before that I was just looking for answers to resolve the issue in my own mind so I could move on, but when I realized the lawlessness of the government agencies, I knew that had to be confronted. To me this has always been primarily a law enforcement issue, because so many crimes have been committed.


15 posted on 03/24/2013 7:02:41 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; Cold Case Posse Supporter

Butter, is CCPS on your list? He should see this thread.


16 posted on 03/24/2013 7:13:46 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I’ve just now started a new ping list. My old one was lost in the last computer crash. I’ve got him on the new list. Maybe I’ll go ahead and ping the list I just started but try to remember who I already pinged and take them out so they don’t get a double-ping.


17 posted on 03/24/2013 7:29:28 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: paythefiddler; Fred Nerks; Aurorales; Danae; TXnMA; Fantasywriter; Ray76; onyx; edge919; ...

Ping. (My apologies if this is a duplicate ping. I’ve just started gathering together a new ping list, since my old one was lost in the last computer crash).


18 posted on 03/24/2013 7:32:38 PM PDT by butterdezillion (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Thanks for the ping.

Keeping you in my prayers.


19 posted on 03/24/2013 7:47:34 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson